<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Rethinking mobile search: towards casual, shared, social mobile search experiences</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Sofia Reis</string-name>
          <email>se.reis@campus.fct.unl.pt</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Karen Church</string-name>
          <email>karen@tid.es</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Nuria Oliver</string-name>
          <email>nuriao@tid.es</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>CITI, Universidade Nova de Lisboa</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>2829-516 Caparica -</addr-line>
          <country country="PT">Portugal</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Telefonica Research, Plaza de Ernest Lluch i Martín</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>5, 08019 Barcelona -</addr-line>
          <country country="ES">Spain</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Telefonica Research, Plaza de Ernest Lluch i Martín</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>5, 08019 Barcelona -</addr-line>
          <country country="ES">Spain</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>The mobile search space has witnessed phenomenal growth in recent years. As a result there has been a growing body of research aimed at understanding why and how mobile users search the Web via their handsets and how their mobile search experiences could be improved. However, much of this work has focused on addressing the many challenges of the mobile space. In this short position paper argue the need for more casual, shared, social mobile search experiences. We outline a number of open and challenging research questions related to shared, social mobile search. Finally, we present our ideas through a proof-ofconcept mobile paper prototype designed to support causal mobile search and information sharing with co-located groups of friends.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Mobile search</kwd>
        <kwd>mobile internet</kwd>
        <kwd>mobile web</kwd>
        <kwd>social search</kwd>
        <kwd>social context</kwd>
        <kwd>casual search</kwd>
        <kwd>shared search</kwd>
        <kwd>collaborative search</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. INTRODUCTION</title>
      <p>Mobile phones, once deemed as simple communications devices,
have now evolved into sophisticated computing devices, offering
users the ability to access a wealth of online information, anytime
and anywhere.</p>
      <p>As mobile Internet usage has increased, there has been a growing
body of research aimed at understanding why and how mobile
users search and browse the Web via their mobile handsets as
well as how their mobile search and browsing experiences could
be improved [2, 4–9, 13, 17]. However, much of this work has
focused on addressing the challenges of the mobile space and
enabling mobile users to find the information they need as quickly
and effectively as possible.</p>
      <p>
        While past research has shed key insights into mobile Web
behaviours and lead to a number of great advances in mobile Web
services, recently there has been a shift in the mobile world,
which we believe will force the community to re-think the mobile
Web and mobile search space. In the past mobile meant
on-thePresented at Searching4Fun workshop at ECIR2012. Copyright © 2012
for the individual papers by the papers' authors. Copying permitted only
for private and academic purposes. This volume is published and
copyrighted by its editors.
move, portable, personal and dynamic. However recent research
has highlighted that (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ) more and more users are accessing the
mobile Web in non-mobile settings like at home or at work [2, 13]
(2) mobile users are often motivated not by an exact need or
urgency, but rather curiosity, boredom and even social avoidance
[2, 17] and (3) mobile web access, and mobile search in particular,
is often a social act, carried out among groups of people, rather
than while the end-user is alone [2, 5, 18]. Given these findings,
we believe it’s time to devote some effort to enable mobile users
to search the Web in a more casual, social setting.
      </p>
      <p>In this short position paper we motivate and argue the role of
shared, social search experiences in the mobile space. We
highlight what we think are important and fruitful areas of
research related to this new direction in mobile search. Finally, to
illustrate our ideas we present examples of a proof-of-concept
mobile paper prototype, which is designed to support causal
search and information sharing with co-located groups of friends
via their mobile handsets.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. BACKGROUND &amp; MOTIVATION</title>
      <p>The gaining momentum of mobile Web and mobile search usage
has also resulted in a growing body of interesting research related
to understanding mobile users, mobile information needs [3, 16]
and mobile Web behaviours [2, 4–6, 9, 13, 17]. In this section we
highlight key takeaway messages extracted from this past work
that we believe motivate a rethinking of the mobile search
experience we provide to users.
2.1</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Mobile does not always mean on-the-move</title>
      <p>Recent findings suggest that mobile users often access online
content in non-mobile settings. For example, a one week diary
study of mobile Web access carried out by Nylander et al. [13]
shows that mobile Internet access occurs mostly at home (31%).
A more recent study by Church &amp; Oliver shows that &gt; 70% of
mobile Web accesses are recorded when users are in familiar,
stationary settings like at home and at work [2]. Cue &amp; Roto [5]
discovered a similar trend emerging in a series of studies they
carried out between 2004-2007. That is mobile Web access is
becoming a more stationary activity. These findings point to the
changing pace of the mobile Web. Location-dependency isn’t the
only factor to consider when designed mobile services. With more
and more mobile users connecting to online content while
engaging in their everyday lives, we need to focus on how we can
build innovative services that integrate seamlessly into their
world.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>2.2 Social interactions are key</title>
      <p>Mobile phones have always been deemed as intimate, personal
communications devices. They tend to be owned by one
individual and do not tend to be shared. Despite this trait, recent
studies show that there is a social, shared aspect to consider in
mobile environments. For example, two studies of mobile
information needs have highlighted that conversations have a
significant impact on the types of information needs that arise
while mobile and how users choose to address those needs [3, 16].
The same is true for mobile Internet behaviours. For example,
Church &amp; Oliver have shown that in &gt; 65% of cases, mobile
search was conducted in the presence of other people [2].
Likewise, a recent study of local mobile search has shown that in
63% of cases, mobile searches took place within a social context
and were discussed with someone else in the group [18].
While research on the social context of mobile search and tools to
facilitate collaboration in mobile search have been limited to date
[10, 11], the same is not true for general Web search [1, 12, 14,
15, 20]. Going forward we believe there will be a need to support
social, collaborative online experiences in mobile environments.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>2.3 Curiosity &amp; boredom are important motivators</title>
      <p>Although research has shown that mobile Web access is
motivated mainly by awareness [17], curiosity and diversion also
account for a significant proportion of mobile Internet motivations
[2]. These motivations relate to the users desire to kill time, to
alleviate boredom and to find out something about an unfamiliar
topic (normally encountered by chance).</p>
      <p>Searching the Internet has traditionally been viewed as driven by a
specific information need in which search is considered successful
if the information the user is looking for is found in a minimal
amount of time. However, in casual search scenarios finding the
right answer to a given query and finding that answer as quickly
as possible may not be the main goals [19]. In fact, in casual
search settings, the search may be considered successful even if
the information the user is looking for is not found. In casual
search scenarios people may browse the Web to pass time while
they are idle, e.g. waiting for the bus. The information need may
be vague or even nonexistent. Therefore, the measure of success
of a casual search process is typically based on the level of user
enjoyment during the search activity and/or on how long the user
has been entertained for. Given that recent research in the mobile
search space highlights that more and more users access content to
kill time, to eliminate boredom, to satisfy their curiosity, we
believe there is more opportunity to support casual search
scenarios in mobile settings.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>3. UNDERSTANDING THE SOCIAL</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>CONTEXT OF MOBILE SEARCH</title>
      <p>In this section we briefly outline results of a survey we conducted
to understand more about social mobile search behavior. Survey
participants were asked to recall their most recent social mobile
search experience, i.e. a search conducted in a co-located group,
to address a shared information need, and answer a series of
questions. The questions we asked included: what they searched
for, their information need, their motivation, who they were with,
their relationship(s) to the people present, where they were
located, what they were doing before and after the search activity,
if and how they shared the search results, and if the search had
any effect on their future plans.
193 participants were recruited from internal and external mailing
lists, online social networks and discussion forums. All
participants had to own an Internet-enabled mobile phone and
must perform mobile web searches at least a few times per month.
Participants ranged in age between 18-61 (average: 31, SD: 6.9).
Responses were provided by 134 men (69.4%) and 59 women
(30.6%) and users came from a diverse range of backgrounds, e.g.
IT, engineering, sales, telecommunications, education and
customer service. The majority of our participants were residents
of Spain (68%) and respondents primarily used Android (40.4%)
handsets to perform their searches. Finally we found that the
majority of participants (87%) stated that they used mobile search
in social settings at least once per week, with 54.9% of
participants using it at least once a day.</p>
      <p>
        Three key findings from this survey that are relevant to this
position paper are as follows: (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ) curiosity and alleviating
boredom was the primary motivation in social mobile search
(almost 50% of responses), (2) the most popular information need
related to trivia and pop culture (almost 40%) and (3) mobile
users tend to share results by simply speaking aloud or sometimes
showing their mobile phone screen. Rarely will users hand over
their phone or share the results through electronic means.
After analyzing user comments about what would improve their
social mobile search experiences many users pointed to more
facilities for sharing the search results easily with their peers.
Here’s some examples of end-user comments: “Being able to
share information through WhatsApp or applications like that”,
“Shortcuts to send the information”, “sharing results should be a
lot easier”, “sharing the screen between all participants”, “Some
kind of co-browsing perhaps? Phone results mesh together”.
These findings combined with insights from past research shows
that searching and sharing search experiences, in a casual manner,
among groups of friends represents a potentially fruitful area of
future research that has been largely ignored to date. In the
following section we outline what we think are important and
open research questions within this new direction of mobile
search.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>4. DISCUSSION AND OPEN RESEARCH</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>QUESTIONS</title>
      <p>In this section we outline a set of open research questions to frame
the challenges and opportunities of developing applications to
facilitate casual, shared, social mobile share:
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§</p>
      <p>What types of mobile interfaces and interactions would
support or enrich the “sharing experience” during social
mobile search?
How can we enrich shared search experiences in relaxed
social scenarios?
Can we make shared mobile search experiences more
entertaining for end-users?
Will users share more search experiences if the sharing
process was simple, quick and easy?
Does the type of content have any impact on the sharing
experience? That is, will users share differently if the content
is dynamic (e.g. a mobile map) versus static (a simple
webpage), or if the content is textual versus visual.</p>
      <p>Do users have preferences in terms of how they share
contents? Do users prefer to share entire pages, snippets of
pages or a “print screen” type view of the page in question?
Would users enjoy and like the ability to re-visit shared
mobile search experiences? How could shared search
experiences be presented to users?
Does time, group size or the relationships within the group
impact on the sharing experience?
Do users need to share remotely, i.e. beyond co-located
groups? How might this physical distance impact on the
experience?
What are the technological challenges in building services to
support casual, shared, social mobile search?
We are currently working on an early stage prototype designed to
facilitate shared social mobile search in casual settings. By
designing, building and evaluating this prototype, we hope we
will be able to answer some of the research questions outlined
previously. In the following section we present our initial ideas to
support causal search and information sharing with co-located
groups of friends via their mobile phones.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-10">
      <title>5. TOWARDS SHARED MOBILE SEARCH</title>
      <p>
        To illustrate our ideas we present details of an early stage mobile
prototype, the design challenges we face and our plans for future
evaluations of this novel mobile search service. The prototype is
designed to enhance social mobile search by facilitating (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ) easy
group identification in co-located settings, (2) options to share a
variety of search elements among groups and (3) the ability to
view and reminisce about past social mobile search experiences.
The software architecture we’re working on consists of two
components: (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ) an Android application that allows users to
search and share their experiences; (2) a server that synchronizes
and stores all search behaviour in a database. The server will also
handle group identification and coordinate a notification facility,
which will inform members of the co-located group about new
“shares”. In addition, the server will log all the interactions
between the user and the Android application for off-line analysis
of user behaviour.
      </p>
      <p>As a first step we worked on a number of iterations of a paper
prototype. The prototype focuses on three main components, each
with its own design challenges:</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-11">
      <title>5.1 Easy Creation of a Sharing Session</title>
      <p>Information sharing on mobile phones is currently a complicated
process and results of our survey reveal that this is the main
reason that people do not share results with one another at present.
Existing mobile browsers tend to require the user to click several
times in order to finally share a web page. And this sharing is
normally supported via email, SMS/MMS or social media like
Facebook or Twitter. Each time a user wants to share another
page, the same long sequence of clicks has to be repeated all over
again. Other approaches to content sharing on mobile phones rely
on Bluetooth, which is well known to be a cumbersome
communication mechanism for end users. The goal of our
application is to make the process of mobile Web information
sharing as simple as a single click.</p>
      <p>
        The first step to achieve this goal is to detect which phones are
associated with the shared search experience/session. At present
we’re focusing our efforts on using (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ) GPS to identify all people
within a given location who have the application installed and (2)
a simply way for users identified in step 1 to confirm or verify
they are a member of a specific group. Given that it’s likely that
the use case for such an application is indoors, GPS will not
provide the fine level of location granularity we require. This is
the motivation for employing a second step in the group
identification process. For step 2, we’re investigating a number of
alternative approaches to confirm association with a specific
group. We’d like this process to be fun and playful, therefore
we’re playing with the use of accelerometers, gestures, images
and video. For example, one option is to ask all users within the
group and at a given location to shake their phones within a given
time period to join a group. This fun, interactive action will
involve using the accelerometer within the phone.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-12">
      <title>5.2 Easy Content Sharing</title>
      <p>
        Our goal is to enable mobile users to share all Web search related
content with the members of their group. Figure 2 illustrates a
simple paper prototype with our main thoughts on how to
approach this task. Given it’s likely that users will want to share a
range of content types we want to provide the users the ability to
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ) share a single search result or the entire page of search results
by pressing an appropriate “share” button (Figure 2 (a)), (2) an
entire Web page or image result (Figure 2 (b)), as well an
interactive maps and addresses (Figure 2 (c)). Each time a piece of
content is shared, that content is shown as a thumbnail in a bar at
the bottom of the screen (Figure 2). Pressing a thumbnail opens
the respective content again. The thumbnails’ bar is scrollable
horizontally.
      </p>
      <p>(a)</p>
      <p>(b)</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-13">
      <title>5.3 Visiting past sessions</title>
      <p>Finally, our prototype will enable users to access their past shared
social search sessions. While our survey did not reveal a large
proportion of users expressing a need for revisiting past sessions,
this need was expressed by a few users and it’s a feature we’d like
to implement and explore to see if it is in fact deemed useful by
end users. A past shared social search session is any session for
which the user instigated a “share” or was the recipient of a
“share”. We are currently playing with different forms of
presenting past shared search experiences to the end user. The
first method is by time. Figure 3 illustrates two potential
approaches to grouping shared experiences by time. We could
show a small thumbnail for each past share, the name of the
shared content and the name of the person who shared it (Figure 3
(a)) or a larger set of thumbnails to support a more visual UI
(Figure 3 (b)). Another means of showing past shared search
sessions is by group, that is allow users to view all shared
searches carried out with or among a certain group of people or
with an individual. Finally, we could show past shared search
sessions by location, that is, allow users to view all shared
searches carried out at a specific place. It’s likely that the choice
of interface will depend on a range of factors including personal
preferences.</p>
      <p>To date, we have developed a number of iterations of a
paperbased prototype and carried out design reviews with 6 users
inhouse to gain feedback and insights on the interface, the
interaction and the core functionality. We are currently working
on implementing an Android application, however, we still have a
number of technological challenges to overcome. Our plan is to
deploy and evaluate the application in-the-wild, among groups of
friends, to learn more about shared, social mobile search
behaviours in the real world.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-14">
      <title>6. CONCLUSIONS</title>
      <p>In this position paper we motivate the need to support casual,
shared, social search experiences in the mobile space through a
review of past work and an outline of key findings from a recent
survey of social mobile search. We highlight a set of open
research questions that we think will be important for the
community going forward. Finally we illustrated our initial ideas
by presenting examples of a work-in-progress mobile prototype,
which is designed to support causal search and information
sharing with co-located groups of friends.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-15">
      <title>7. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS</title>
      <p>This work is funded as part of a Marie Curie Intra European
Fellowship for Career Development (IEF) award held by Karen
Church. Sofia Reis is currently an intern in Telefonica Research.
As such this work was partly funded by Telefonica Research and
by FCT/MCTES, through grant SFRH/BD/61085/2009. Note that
the survey portion of the work was conducted with Antony Cousin
of University of Nottingham while he was an intern at Telefonica
Research in Autumn 2011.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-16">
      <title>8. REFERENCES</title>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>[1] [2] [3] [4]</source>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Amershi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Morris</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>CoSearch: a system for co-located collaborative web search</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of CHI'08</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>ACM</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ),
          <fpage>1647</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1656</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Church</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Oliver</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Understanding mobile web and mobile search use in today's dynamic mobile landscape</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of MobileHCI '11</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>ACM</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          ),
          <fpage>67</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>76</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Church</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Smyth</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Understanding the intent behind mobile information needs</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings IUI '09</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>ACM</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          ),
          <fpage>247</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>256</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>In Proceedings of MobileHCI '08</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>ACM</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ),
          <fpage>13</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>22</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cui</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Roto</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>How people use the web on mobile devices</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of WWW'08</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>ACM</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ),
          <fpage>905</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>914</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kamvar</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Baluja</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.,</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>A large scale study of wireless search behavior</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of CHI '06</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>ACM</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          ),
          <fpage>701</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>709</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kamvar</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Baluja</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Query suggestions for mobile search</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceeding of CHI '08</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>ACM</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ),
          <fpage>1013</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1016</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Karlson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Robertson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Robbins</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Czerwinski</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Smith</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>FaThumb: a facetbased interface for mobile search</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings CHI '06</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>ACM</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          ),
          <fpage>711</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>720</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kim</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kim</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>An Empirical Study of Use Contexts in the Mobile Internet, Focusing on the Usability of Information Architecture</article-title>
          .
          <source>Information Systems Frontiers. 7</source>
          ,
          <issue>2</issue>
          (
          <year>2005</year>
          ),
          <fpage>175</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>186</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kotani</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nakamura</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tanaka</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Supporting sharing of browsing information and search results in mobile collaborative searches</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of WISE'11</source>
          , Springer-Verlag (
          <year>2011</year>
          ),
          <fpage>298</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>305</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Morris</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lombardo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wigdor</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>WeSearch: supporting collaborative search and sensemaking on a tabletop display</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of CSCW'10</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>ACM</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2010</year>
          ),
          <fpage>401</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>410</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nylander</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lundquist</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Brännström</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>At home and with computer access</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of CHI '09</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>ACM</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          ),
          <fpage>1639</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1642</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Paul</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Morris</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>CoSense: enhancing sensemaking for collaborative web search</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of CHI'09</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>ACM</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          ),
          <fpage>1771</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1780</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Perez</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Whiting</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , and Jose,
          <string-name>
            <surname>J. M.,</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>CoFox: A visual collaborative browser</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of CIR '11</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>ACM</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          ),
          <fpage>29</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>32</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sohn</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Li</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Griswold</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hollan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>J.D.</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A diary study of mobile information needs</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of CHI '08</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>ACM</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ),
          <fpage>433</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>442</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Taylor</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Anicello</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Somohano</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Samuels</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Whitaker</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ramey</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>A framework for understanding mobile internet motivations and behaviors</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of CHI '08 Extended Abstracts</source>
          , ACM (
          <year>2008</year>
          ),
          <fpage>2679</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>2684</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Teevan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Karlson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Amini</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Brush</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.J.B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Krumm</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. Understanding</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>the importance of location, time, and people in mobile local search behavior</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of MobileHCI '11</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>ACM</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          ),
          <fpage>77</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>80</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wilson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Elsweiler</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Casual-leisure Searching: the Exploratory Search scenarios that break our current models</article-title>
          .
          <source>HCIR'10: 4th International Workshop on Human-Computer Interaction and Information Retrieval</source>
          (
          <year>2010</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wiltse</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>and</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nichols</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.,</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>PlayByPlay: collaborative web browsing for desktop and mobile devices</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of CHI'09</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>ACM</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          ),
          <fpage>1781</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>