<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Tackling a DISASTER using semantic technologies</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Guillermo Gonzalez-Moriyon</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Emilio Rubiera</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Marcos Sacristan</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Javier Collado</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Fundacion CTIC Gijon</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Asturias</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="ES">Spain</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Treelogic Llanera</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Asturias</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="ES">Spain</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>In the event of a disaster, coordination of emergency responders is challenging due to the diversity of support systems in use. Work is now being done to tackle the problem leveraging semantic technologies. The chosen approach focuses on the interoperability between Emergency Management Systems (EMSs) via data mediation and a reference ontology. This paper introduces the DISASTER FP7 project and outlines its main activities planned for the upcoming years.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>emergency management systems</kwd>
        <kwd>ontology</kwd>
        <kwd>data mediation</kwd>
        <kwd>ontology modularization</kwd>
        <kwd>data sharing</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        Near 100,000 people died in Europe in the rst decade of this century due to
natural and industrial disasters [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]. Transport accidents and terrorism also add
casualities to this gure. Moreover, material losses ascend to 150 billion Euro
from natural disasters alone in the same decade. Disasters such as L'Aquila,
Eyjafjallajokull, Prestige and Chernobyl will remain carved in the collective
European consciousness.
      </p>
      <p>In the current era, developed countries have a number of bodies that
respond to emergencies in order to minimize casualities and economic loss. First
responders include re brigades, police, hospitals and military forces. An e
ective response depends on their ability to quickly take decisions based on accurate
and reliable data. Emergency Management Systems (EMS) are information tools
supporting resolutive actions against the clock.</p>
      <p>Nowadays Europe showcases a well-spread heterogeneity of EMSs
depending on the stakeholder \color" (emergency jargon to identify rst responders)
and the administrative division (city, region, etc.) where they operate. Political
boundaries and compartimentation of functional competences are a hindrance
for uid communication and information exchange between EMSs. This
fragmentation has evolved with time for cultural and historic reasons, and it is an
unavoidable part of the European reality. The complexity of some emergency
situations requires the participation of a variety of rst responders who depend
crucially on their ability to e ectively exchange data (Figure 1).
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Requirements for e ective operational data exchange</title>
      <p>At the event of a disaster many entities are involved. Some may be a ected
by the disaster, others may need to take contigence actions, while others may
be accidental watchers of the incident. Thus, each entity can provide a partial
version of the total picture. The objective is to make the most complete picture
available to decision makers by putting together the partial pictures coming
from the di erent parts involved. Due to the decentralization of the information
scenario a number of conditions must be ful lled:
{ It must be possible to gather and to manage heterogeneous information from
many available sources. This information includes an appropriate description
of the disaster event in terms of both quality and quantity. In addition, the
description of the scenario must be enriched with contextual and
environmental data, e.g., infrastructures, populated areas, weather forecast... This
harvest process often faces challenges due to the incompleteness and
incorrectness of the data.
{ The description of the scenario must be shared and agreed by the
stakeholders in real time. A common picture facilitates team coordination and
synchronization of response operations, for instance, to know in real time
which areas have been already evacuated.
{ Information overload must be prevented. Decisions are di cult to make when
dealing with an overwhelming volume of heterogeneous data. Filtering
information in terms of relevance is crucial. Moreover, the concept of relevance is
subjective: each actor is interested in a di erent subset of the information.
{ Information pieces must be referenced with respect to both geographical and
temporal coordinates. To gain an insight of the situation, it helps to have
map interfaces and events displayed in sequence.
{ Message oriented communications among di erent responders must be
effective regardless of cultural and technical di erences. Due to the diversity
at each end of the channel, many problems arise including divergences of
communication protocols, data formats or information models. In addition
to the core message, the sender may decide to include additional information
that enriches the message and increases its usefulness to the receiver.
{ When integrating information from various sources and communication
breakdown occurs, previously exchanged information might still be valuable. Not
all data has the same expiration date: topographic information will still be
valid, whereas current positioning of units deployed is dynamic and
potentially untrustable afterwards.</p>
      <p>The aforementioned conditions match some of the research topics tackled by
the Semantic Web, e.g., information quality, data and model sharing, or data
enrichment. These matchings suggest that a potential solution to the EMS
interoperability problem may reuse the ndings from the Semantic Web community.
Moreover, the work on Semantic Web has demonstrated the value of
adopting open standards to reuse vocabularies and exchange data between decoupled
systems in the absence of a central authority.
3</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>A novel approach to disasters</title>
      <p>DISASTER (Data Interoperability Solutions at STakeholders Emergencies
Reaction) is a collaborative European project including software vendors, research
organizations and specialists in emergency response. The goal of DISASTER
is to ease communication among existing EMSs considering the requirements
aforementioned.</p>
      <p>DISASTER project respects EMSs diversity in Europe. No \one size ts all"
central EMS or unique exchange language is proposed. Instead, DISASTER relies
on a shared reference ontology as well as on mediation techniques. As depicted
on Figure 2, semantic technologies will make possible for any EMS to exchange
information and to query external sources including Geographical Information
Systems and the Linked Open Data cloud, and of course, other EMSs.</p>
      <p>
        When it comes to mutual understanding, the rst step is to agree on shared
baseline knowledge. Under our approach, this knowledge is modelled with
ontologies. Ontologies have been proved to solve common understanding problems [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Moreover, the use of ontologies to specify knowledge in the domain of
emergencies have already been discussed in a number of studies [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref3">1, 3</xref>
        ]. Despite this body of
previous work, in 2011 the European Commission identi ed the need to develop
an ontology shared by all stakeholders (FP7 research topic SEC-2011.5.3-2).
4
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Prospective work</title>
      <p>DISASTER has commenced in February 2012 and will run until 2015. The
project has started by gathering requirements about di erent aspects: from rst
responders operative requirements to linguistic and cultural requirements.</p>
      <p>DISASTER proposes data mediation to tackle communication problems among
EMSs. E orts are planned to bring to practice the theoretical results of the
research community on data mediation. Actual interoperability among EMSs poses
a number of challenges regarding several dimensions of the problem:
communication protocols, data models and data formats. A workable solution typically
involves all these aspects.</p>
      <p>
        The main result of the project will be the DISASTER ontology. The
creation of this ontology will follow a modular approach: the core module will be
based on upper level ontologies such as DOLCE [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ] or SUMO [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ]. This core will
be complemented with transversal modules giving support for representation of
temporal and spatial descriptions. These vertical modules are vital to express
contextual information, and o er a chance to plug-in existing domain
ontologies and taxonomies. Finally, vertical modules will extend the base functionality
to di erent domains at the levels of both disaster description and stakeholder
resources. Although a modular design brings a number of di culties at design
time, this methodology allows further extension to t speci c scenarios in the
future. It is expected that at the end of the DISASTER project, a stable version
of the ontology (as universal as possible) will be produced, leaving it feasible to
store a local copy for each emergency system. By means of this ontology,
mediation can take place in order to consume external data before any connection
breakdown and under o ine circumstances.
      </p>
      <p>The ontology will serve to combine heterogeneous information coming from
diverse sources. The project will study how to coherently assemble an agreed
disaster scenario description. Moreover, map-based visualization paradigms will be
explored to merge context information with operational data and user-oriented
mechanisms will be de ned to lter relevant subsets of information. Devices
supporting on site operations should be taken into account. Responders are
often equipped with mobile devices providing access to the information. However,
connectivity issues must be addressed as connection cannot be ensured.</p>
      <p>Finally, in order to ensure the DISASTER solution is grounded on reality,
validation will be carried out. At this early stage of the project the details of the
nal project scenario are still a draft. However, one of the possibilities involves
a (simulated) disaster at a large international European airport with a
transnational component featuring stakeholders of di erent kinds and nationalities.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>The research leading to these results has received funding from the European
Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement
n 285069.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Fan</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Zlatanova</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Exploring ontology potential in emergency management</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proceedings of the Gi4DM conference geomatics for disaster management</source>
          <year>2010</year>
          ,
          <volume>179</volume>
          (
          <issue>13</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>e18</fpage>
          ,
          <year>2010</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Fensel</surname>
          </string-name>
          . Ontologies:
          <article-title>Silver Bullet for Knowledge Management and Electronic Commerce</article-title>
          , volume
          <volume>48</volume>
          . Springer,
          <year>2003</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Liu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Ling</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>An</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Sha</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Building a Practical Ontology for Emergency Response Systems</article-title>
          .
          <source>International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering</source>
          , pages
          <volume>222</volume>
          {
          <fpage>225</fpage>
          ,
          <year>2008</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Masolo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Borgo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Gangemi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Guarino</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Oltramari</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Schneider. WonderWeb Deliverable</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>D17</article-title>
          .
          <article-title>The WonderWeb Library of Foundational Ontologies and the DOLCE ontology</article-title>
          ,
          <year>2002</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
            <surname>Niles</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Pease</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Towards a standard upper ontology</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proceedings of the international conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems FOIS 01</source>
          ,
          <year>2001</year>
          (
          <volume>3):2</volume>
          {
          <issue>9</issue>
          ,
          <year>2001</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E. E. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Technical</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Mapping the impacts of natural hazards and technological accidents in Europe An overview of the last decade</article-title>
          .
          <source>Technical Report 13, European Environmental Agency (EEA)</source>
          ,
          <year>2010</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>