<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Direct and Indirect Impact Analysis of Ukrainian Industries on Gross Output and Labor Market in Leontief Model</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Vitaliy Kobets</string-name>
          <email>vkobets@kse.org.ua</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Key Terms. DecisionMaking</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>MathematicalModel, Industry, Macroeconomics, MatrixApproach</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Kherson State University, Chair of Informatics</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>40 rokiv Zhovtnya, 27, 73000 Kherson</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>259</fpage>
      <lpage>266</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>In the paper are compared direct and indirect impact analysis of Ukrainian industries production on employment of labor market, profitability and gross output in 2010, it is developed recommendations for state policy to support of priority industries.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd />
        <kwd>Input-output model</kwd>
        <kwd>industries</kwd>
        <kwd>direct and indirect influence</kwd>
        <kwd>gross output</kwd>
        <kwd>final demand</kwd>
        <kwd>externality</kwd>
        <kwd>multiplier</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Input-output model (IOM) distributes gross output on intermediate and final demand.
Algebraic input-output method allows simultaneously taking into account production
costs of goods with consideration of technological interconnection. The matrix of
technological coefficients demonstrates direct costs of industries on production, and
matrix of multiplicators shows complete costs of industries on production of their
goods (with consideration technologically linked costs of the others industries). A
difference between complete and direct costs forms indirect costs.</p>
      <p>In article [3] the fraction of indirect costs of industry is calculated by means the
language Octave [4] with the using of technological coefficients matrix and
eigenvector of matrix.</p>
      <p>For the input-output matrix is solved both direct problem (for the calculation of
GDP), and indirect problem (for estimation of the gross value added) after the types
of economical activities [5] with using existent restrictions (material, labor etc).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Results</title>
      <p>explicit (direct) indexes, not taking into account the indirect influencing (external
effect), which industry is diffuses on the other industries of country.</p>
      <p>Purpose of this article is to define direct and indirect influence (external effect) of
every industry of Ukrainian economy on the gross output of country for application of
state support for priority development industries.
At construction of interindustry balance take into consideration interdependence
between separate economical industries and their links with final demand, that is
represented into table 1 (хij – production output of i-th industry, that is used for
manufacture of the products of j-th industry; Xj – gross output of j-th industry; Yj –
final demand on the products of j-th industry) [6]:
Let us to denote cost of labor for production of j-th industry good through Lj, where
j=1,2,…,n – number of industry, and output production of this product (gross output)
through Xj, then direct labor cost on unit of j-th type of product (coefficient of direct
labor-intensiveness) are determined by a formula:
t j </p>
      <p>L</p>
      <p>j , j 1, ..., n.</p>
      <p>
        X j
A general needs in labor resources for n industries is determined after a formula:
n n
L   Li   ti  X i t1  X1  t2  X 2  ...  tn  X n
i1 i1
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        )
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        )
From a formula X  B Y ( B - matrix of multipliers or complete costs) we will get
the following values of industries production output:
      </p>
      <p>X1  b11 Y1  b12 Y2  ...  b1n Yn ,
X 2  b21 Y1  b22 Y2  ...  b2n Yn ,
................................................</p>
      <p>X n  bn1 Y1  bn2 Y2  ...  bnn Yn.</p>
      <p>T111  t111  B1111 ,
where
 ti</p>
      <p>persons/1000hrn.;
 Ti
persons/1000hrn;</p>
      <p>coefficients
Then labor cost can be presented as follow:
L  t1 b11 Y1  b12 Y2  ...  b1n Yn   t2  b21 Y1  b22 Y2  ...  b2n Yn   tn  bn1 Y1  bn2 Y2  ...  bnn Yn 
We will rearrange the elements regarding to final demand on the industries products,
we will obtain:
L  Y1 b11 t1  b21 t2  ...  bn1 tn   Y2 b12 t1  b22 t2 ...  bn2 tn   Yn b1n t1  b2n t2  ...  bnn tn 
From the last equation we will calculate the complete labor costs:</p>
      <p>Tn  b1n  t1  b2n  t2  ...  bnn  tn .</p>
      <p>We will rewrite indirect labor costs as a matrix by the following formula:
.................................................</p>
      <p>B1111  (E  A)11111
of
direct labor
cost
maintenances in
i-th
industry,
- coefficients of complete labor cost
maintenances in i-th industry,</p>
      <p>Li - employed workers in industry, persons/1000hrn;


 t111 - matrix of direct labor costs;
 T111 - matrix of complete labor costs;</p>
      <p>B1111 - matrix of multipliers of input-output model;
 A - matrix of technological coefficients of IOM;
 E - unitary matrix.</p>
      <p>Difference between direct ti and complete Ti labor costs consists in that direct labor
costs show an additional (marginal) needs in labor resources for i-th industry after
unit increasing of final demand on the products of i-th industry, and the complete
labor costs show an additional (marginal) needs in labor resources for all n industries
after the unit increase of final demand on the products of i-th industry.</p>
      <p>
        On the basis of direct and complete labor coefficients are developed interindustry
labor costs balances for available labor resources. These balances are built as matrix
models, and all indexes in them (interindustry links, final product etc) are expressed
in labor measurer (amount of persons).
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        )
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        )
      </p>
      <p>For reduction of matrix model dimension without the loss of generality of its
conclusions we reduced the number of Ukrainian industries from 15 to 11 by
regrouping, after that we yield:</p>
      <p>List of industries:
1. Agriculture, hunting, forestry, fishing, fish-farming.
2. Mining industry, processing industry, production and distributing of electric
power, gas and water.
3. Building.
4. Trade; repair of cars, common manufacture and individual commodity, activities
of hotels and restaurants.
5. Activity of transport and communication.
6. Financial activity.
7. Operations with the real estate, lease, engineering and rendering of services for
entrepreneurships.
8. Public administration.</p>
      <p>9. Education.
10. Health protection and social service.
11. Public and individual service; culture and sport activity.</p>
      <p>Values of table 2 columns for the gross output and final demand are got on the
basis of Statistics state committee data [1], employment after industries is received
from statistical collection [2], and the gross value added is calculated by the means of
MS Excel on the basis of IOM [6].</p>
      <p>The structure of employment for each industry is presented on fig.1 (numeration
corresponds previous list of industries above).
1 Gross output consists of intermediate product and final demand
2 Final demand includes: final consumer consumption, gross investments and net export
5%
6%
2%
8%
7%
7%
4%</p>
      <p>16%
22%
5%
18%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
we will get the indexes of profitability of each from 11 industries (table 2):</p>
      <p>We got from the indexes of profitability (fig. 2), there are three unprofitable
industries in 2010, which give such public benefits as state administration, education
and health protection. These industry require considerably greater financing on own
activities, than they earn. However finally to make decision about their influence on
an economy as a whole it is possible only taking into account externality, i.e. their
influence on the other industries of Ukrainian economy.</p>
      <p>200,00% 36,10%42,30%36,30%56,60%61,30%55,60%42,30%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7</p>
      <p>0,00%
-200,00%
,% -400,00%
y
t
i
l
ib -600,00%
a
t
i
fro -800,00%
p
-1000,00%
-1200,00%
-1400,00%</p>
      <p>Industries</p>
      <p>After calculation of industries multipliers from matrix B we will get that a most
increase of GDP is induced exactly by those industries which are financed from the
state budget. Every hryvnya invested in state administration; education and health
protection is enhanced gross output in Ukraine on 7 hrn.; by 61 UAH and 11 UAH
accordingly, that with surplus covers direct costs of state on these industries activities.
Educational industry has most significant influencing and there is reserve for the
increasing of country gross output. Education stimulates a positive GDP dynamics. So
after a direct effect this industry on every invested hryvnya gets a loss in size of 10 to
UAH, and after indirect get profit in 26 UAH (multiplication of average profitability
on multiplier), that together gives the positive influencing in 16 UAH on the gross
value added of Ukrainian industries.</p>
      <p>Thus the crisis phenomena in the economy of country are not to stipulate the cost
decreasing after all directions in same proportion. The state adjusting of industry has
to base on that return which is had by every industry and proportionally to its
influence on an economy not to decrease, and in the some cases, taking into account
their external effects, to increase state costs for them for stimulation of gross output of
all linked industry.</p>
      <p>
        After finding relation of final demand to the gross output X (from table 1) we will
get what measure of each industry is oriented into final, and which is on intermediate
demand (fig. 3). We have, that build industry (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ) is most oriented on final demand
(94,3% whole product), and  trade industry, activity of hotels and restaurants (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ); 
financial activity (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ) and  state administration (8) are most oriented on intermediate
demand (100%-7,8%=92,2%, 92,2% and 98,2% accordingly).
Production part for final demand
      </p>
      <p>29,00%
21,60%
43,10%
46,90%
45,70%
48,20%
48,00%
1,80%
7,80%
7,80%
11
10
9
y 8
r
t
su 7
d
n
if 6
o
r
e 5
b
m
u 4
n
3
2
1
Industries</p>
      <p>We will consider application of interindustry balance method for direct and
indirect influence on Ukrainian industries’ production on a labor market. The
important analytical possibility of this method is determination of direct and complete
labor cost on product unit and development the recommendations in relation to state
support of priority development industries for the stimulation of employment growth
of country.</p>
      <p>
        After the calculations after formulas (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ) and (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ) we will present results as table 4:
Indirect
labor cost
coefficients
T-t
      </p>
      <p>
        We will analyze indexes above. Agriculture and fishing industry of (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ) during
production of own goods increases whole labor cost almost twice in comparison with
its own direct labor cost. More, than twice the indirect labor cost are increased in such
industries as a transport and communication is in 2,25 times (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ), financial activity at
2,1 times (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ), operations with the real estate in 2,4 times (7), education in 2,74 times
(9).
      </p>
      <p>
        Indirect labor cost increases at 5,6 times in processing industry (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ). It means that
this industry is priority so it has a primary importance for stimulation of employment
in all industries of Ukrainian economy.
      </p>
      <p>The least stimulation of indirect labor cost (due to growth of industry output) is
observed in industry of health protection and social service (10).
4</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>Taking into account obtained influence of each industry gross output for
determination of state policy strategy it follows to take into consideration results of
indirect industries influencing on stimulation of employment, gross output and
profitability of both individual industry and whole economy. For example, education
industry after the direct influencing was unprofitable, and after indirect was
profitable, so its net gross value added was positive.</p>
      <p>Further it is planned to explore and compare the direct and indirect influencing of
Ukrainian industries activity and Countries of Independent States for development of
effective state policy proposals in the field of national economy.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>1. State Committee of Statistics, http://ukrstat.org/uk/ (in Ukrainian)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2. State Statistics Commit.tee of Ukraine, http://www.ukrstat.gov.
          <source>ua (in Ukrainian)</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Stetsyok</surname>
            <given-names>P.I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bondarenko</surname>
            <given-names>A.V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>About spectral properties of Leontieff model</article-title>
          .
          <source>Theory of optimal decisions. 10</source>
          ,
          <fpage>84</fpage>
          --
          <lpage>90</lpage>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          )
          <article-title>(in Russian)</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Program</given-names>
            <surname>Language</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Octave</surname>
          </string-name>
          , http://www.octave.org
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kulik</surname>
            <given-names>V.V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Scientific activity in the system of economic circulation. Economicmathematical design of the socio-economic systems</article-title>
          .
          <volume>4</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>45</fpage>
          --
          <lpage>67</lpage>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          )
          <article-title>(in Ukrainian)</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kolemaev</surname>
            <given-names>V.A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Matematical Economics</article-title>
          . UNITY, Moscow (
          <year>1998</year>
          )
          <article-title>(in Russian)</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>