=Paper= {{Paper |id=None |storemode=property |title=Formal Foundations for RDF Evolution and Repair |pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-848/ICTERI-2012-CEUR-WS-Invited-2-p-12.pdf |volume=Vol-848 |dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/icteri/Antoniou12 }} ==Formal Foundations for RDF Evolution and Repair== https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-848/ICTERI-2012-CEUR-WS-Invited-2-p-12.pdf
Formal Foundations for RDF Evolution and Repair

                               Grigoris Antoniou

                  University of Huddersfield, United Kingdom
                        antoniou@ics.forth.gr



 Abstract: There are ongoing efforts to provide declarative formalisms of
 integrity constraints over RDF data. In this context, addressing the evolution of
 RDF knowledge bases while respecting associated constraints is a challenging
 issue, yet to receive a full formal treatment. This problem has become more
 important with the emergence of Linked Open Data, which is based on RDF.
 Linked Open Data is becoming a key enabler as it is rapidly being taken up by
 governments and organizations to make their information available and usable,
 and is the basis of significant economic activity around an emerging "data
 economy".
 In this talk we describe a theoretical framework for dealing with both schema
 and data change requests, based on the notion a rational change operator as one
 that satisfies the belief revision principles of Success, Validity and Minimal
 Change. The semantics of such an operator is subject to customization, by
 tuning the properties that a rational change should adhere to. We prove some
 interesting theoretical results, as well as algorithmic solutions. We then show
 how the problem of ontology repair can be addressed with similar techniques.
 And we conclude with a discussion of challenges that need to be addressed to
 further advance the state of the art.


 Keywords. RDF knowledge evolution, integrity constraint, Linked Open Data,
 data economy, schema and data change, belief revision, ontology repair.

 Key Terms. LinkedData, KnowledgeEvolution, KnowledgeRepresentation,
 KnowledgeManagementProcess.