=Paper=
{{Paper
|id=None
|storemode=property
|title=Pulsed laser heating of differently aged soot probed using LII and LES
|pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-865/Olofsson.pdf
|volume=Vol-865
}}
==Pulsed laser heating of differently aged soot probed using LII and LES==
Pulsed laser heating of differently aged soot
probed using LII and ELS
Nils-Erik Olofsson1 Jonathan Johnsson2 Henrik Bladh3 Per-Erik Bengtsson4
Combustion Physics, Lund University, Box 118, SE-22100, Lund, Sweden
1 2
E-mail: nils-erik.olofsson@forbrf.lth.se, E-mail: jonathan.johnsson@forbrf.lth.se,
3 4
E-mail: henrik.bladh@forbrf.lth.se, E-mail: per-erik.bengtsson@forbrf.lth.se
Laser‐induced incandescence (LII) is a laser‐based technique for measuring soot particle sizes
and soot volume fractions e.g. in flames, furnaces and exhaust gases. The basic principle of the
technique is a rapid heating of soot particles with pulsed laser light and then detecting the
increased incandescence. During the last two decades LII has been extensively refined and
evolved to one of the standard techniques when conducting in situ measurements on soot
particles. However, there are still refinements to be made, not least in understanding the
interaction between laser light and soot, which is crucial information in the evaluation process
where this interaction is modeled together with the subsequent cooling of the soot particles.
In this work the heating and vaporization effects of the LII laser pulse on differently
aged soot have been studied by a combination of LII and elastic light scattering (ELS) with an
experimental procedure similar to the one used in [1], but with additional possibility for
pyrometry using two‐color LII. By using an Nd:YAG laser at 1064 nm for the LII and another at
532 nm for ELS, and intersecting the laser beams in the probe volume, the elastic scattering
can be utilized to probe heating and vaporization effects of the 1064 nm laser light. To
generate the soot particles a McKenna type burner has been used, where the soot growth can
be followed from nascent soot particles close to the burner surface to more mature soot
higher up in the flame.
Results show a significant difference as a function of height above burner (HAB) as
seen in Fig. 1. This behavior could be explained by a variation in both the absorption function,
E(m), and the sublimation threshold at different HAB i.e. for differently aged soot.
Furthermore the results reveal an effect not discussed in [1], namely a slight increase of the
scattering signal from soot just before the rapid decrease due to vaporization, seen in Fig. 2.
Figure 2 Normalized ELS signal before and after an LII laser
pulse with fluence 0.3 J/cm2 at 10 mm HAB.
Figure 1 Normalized ELS signal before and after an LII laser
pulse with fluence 0.3 J/cm2. Top plot shows measurement at 8
mm HAB and bottom plot at 10 mm HAB.
[1] G. D. Yoder, P. K. Diwakar, D. W. Hahn ”Assessment of soot particle vaporization effects
during laser‐induced incandescence with time‐resolved light scattering”, Appl. Opt. 44 (2005)
5th international workshop on Laser-Induced Incandescence
May 9-11, 2012, Palais des Congrès, Le Touquet, France