<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Distributed Reasoning with</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>George A. Vouros</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>George M.Santipantakis</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Digital Systems, University of Piraeus</institution>
          ,
          <country country="GR">Greece</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>ICSD, University of the Aegean</institution>
          ,
          <country country="GR">Greece</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>To deal with autonomous agents' knowledge and subjective beliefs in open, heterogeneous and inherently distributed settings, we need special formalisms that combine knowledge from multiple and potentially heterogeneous interconnected contexts. Each context contains a chunk of knowledge de ning a logical theory, called ontology unit ). While standard logics may be used, subjectiveness and heterogeneity issues have been tackled by knowledge representation formalisms called contextual logics or modular ontology languages (e.g. [1] [2]).Nevertheless, in distributed and open settings we may expect that di erent ontology units should be combined in many di erent, subtle ways without making any assumption about the disjointness of the domains covered by di erent units. To address this issue we need to increase the expressivity of the language used for de ning correspondences.Towards this goal, we have been motivated to propose the representation framework EHDQD+L SHIQ (or simply E SHIQ).</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        i : C !v j : G, where i 6= j 2 I. (b) Individual subjective correspondences
i : ai 7 != j : bj , where ai 2 NOi and bj 2 NOj . The above mentioned subjective
correspondences concern the point of view of Mj . (c) Link-properties [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ](or
ijproperties, i; j 2 I ), which can be related via ij-property inclusion axioms, be
transitive and, if they are simple, be restricted by qualitative restrictions. The
sets of ij -properties' names, i.e. the sets ij , i; j 2 I, are not necessarily
pairwise disjoint, but disjoint with respect to NCi , and NOi . A set of ij -properties
connecting concepts of Mi with concepts of Mj , is de ned as the set Eij = ij ,
i 6= j 2 I, and in case i = j, it is the set Eij = ij [ fInv(E)jE 2 jig, where ij
is the set of (local to Mi) role names. ij -properties are being used for specifying
concepts (so called i concepts) in the Mi unit.
      </p>
      <p>Transitive axioms are of the form T rans(E; (i; j)), where E 2 Eij \ Eii, E
is transitive in Mi and transitive ij-property. Transitivity axioms and the nite
set of inclusion axioms for ij -properties form the ij -property box Rij (if i = j,
Rii = Ri). The combined property box RBox R is a family of ij -property
boxes. A combined TBox is a family of TBoxes T= fTigi2I . A distributed ABox
A = fAigi2I , includes a collection of individual correspondences, and property
assertions of the form (a Eij b), where Eij 2 Eij . A distributed knowledge base
is composed as = hT; R; B; Ai, where B = fBij gi6=j2I is the collection
of bridge rules between ontology units. Each Rij , is interpreted by a valuation
function Iij that maps every ij -property to a subset of iIi jIj . Let Iij =
h iIi ; jIj ; Iij i, i; j 2 I. It must be noted that, for a speci c i 2 I and a property
E in the i-th unit, this property may be shared between di erent ij -property
boxes (i.e. for di erent j's). In this case, the denotation of E is Sj2I EIij . A
domain relation rij ; i 6= j from
each d 2 iIi , rij (d) fd0jd0 2
rij (d2), then d1 = d2. For a subset D of iIi , rij (D) denotes [d2Drij (d). A
domain relation represents only equalities, i.e. each d1 2 rij (d) is equal to the
other individuals in rij (d). The distributed knowledge base is interpreted by a
Distributed Interpretation, I s.t. I = hfIigi2I ; fIij gi;j2I ; frij gi6=j2I i.</p>
      <p>
        We have speci ed a sound and complete distributed Tableau algorithm that
has been implemented by extending the Pellet reasoner 3. The instance retrieval
algorithm for the framework has been presented in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>iIi to jIj is a subset of iIi jIj , s.t. for</p>
      <p>Ij
j g, and in case d0 2 rij (d1) and d0 2
Acknowledgement: This research project is being supported by the project
"IRAKLITOS II" of the O.P.E.L.L. 2007 - 2013 of the NSRF (2007 - 2013), co-funded by the
European Union and National Resources of Greece.
3 The full paper describing the framework and the tableau algorithm can be found in
http://ai-lab-webserver.aegean.gr/gsant/ESHIQ.Report</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Borgida</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sera</surname>
            <given-names>ni</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , L.:
          <article-title>Distributed description logics: Assimilating information from peer sources</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Data Semantics</source>
          <volume>1</volume>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          )
          <volume>153</volume>
          {
          <fpage>184</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Parsia</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cuenca Grau</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Generalized link properties for expressive epsilonconnections of description logics</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: AAAI</source>
          . (
          <year>2005</year>
          )
          <volume>657</volume>
          {
          <fpage>662</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Baader</surname>
          </string-name>
          , F.e.a., ed.:
          <source>The Description Logic Handbook: Theory</source>
          , Implementation, and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Applications</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Cambridge University Press (
          <year>2003</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Santipantakis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vouros</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G.:
          <article-title>Distributed Instance Retrieval in EHDQD+LSHIQ Representation Framework</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Arti cial Intelligence: Theories and Applications</source>
          . Volume
          <volume>7297</volume>
          <source>of LNCS</source>
          . Springer Berlin / Heidelberg (
          <year>2012</year>
          )
          <volume>141</volume>
          {
          <fpage>148</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>