=Paper=
{{Paper
|id=None
|storemode=property
|title=Using LOD to share clean energy data and knowledge
|pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-877/paper2.pdf
|volume=Vol-877
}}
==Using LOD to share clean energy data and knowledge==
https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-877/paper2.pdf
Using LOD1 to Share Clean Energy Data and
Knowledge
Denise Recheis, Florian Bauer
REEEP – The Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Partnership, Wagramerstrasse 5,
1400 Vienna, Austria,
(denise.recheis, florian.bauer )@reeep.org
Abstract. This paper explains why and how some of the most essential features
of reegle.info, a one-stop information gateway in the renewable energy and en-
ergy efficiency sector, are based on Linked Open Data technologies. reegle fo-
cuses heavily on clean energy and related issues and draws most of its content
from a wide range of open data sources – in such a way it maintains itself and
ensures that reegle users have access to the latest high quality information, pre-
sented in a visually appealing way. Services such as reegle’s comprehensive
dossiers on individual countries take advantage of the future web of (LOD) da-
ta. All content is also available for external use via reegle’s data portal.
Keywords: mashups, open energy data, linked data, open data, semantic web
1 reegle – a Clean Energy Open Data Portal
Reegle2 has already established itself as a popular information portal in the field of
renewable energy and energy efficiency. With more than 220,000 users per month,3
its services have been well perceived by the community and proved their usefulness.
Reegle was first launched by REEEP4 and REN215 in 2006 as a free specialist search
engine and information gateway. In response to recent changes in the way that data is
retrieved, offered and displayed on the web, a complete re-design in its style and con-
tent, as well as in its technology and services was deemed necessary. This makeover
has been ongoing since 2010 and has opened up many new avenues for reegle and its
users.
As a consumer as well as a provider of open data, reegle displays data retrieved from
various authoritative sources in new and interesting ways while at the same time of-
fing all such data for free integration into other websites. In fact, Reegle now offers
all of its data under the W3C standards, as open and linked data in a non-proprietary
(RDF6) format.
1
Linked Open Data
2
www.reegle.info
3
as of April 2012
4
Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Partnership – www.reeep.org
5
Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century – www.ren21.net
6
Resource Description Framework, Linked Open Data format
1.1 reegle’s Decision to Go LOD
Reegle was founded to ensure access to timely information in the clean energy sector.
Originally a search engine was viewed as the most useful tool to connect users and
relevant content, but the onset of Open Data and Linked Open Data today allows such
information to be made directly available to users on the reegle website.
Reegle operates on a now-profit basis and is funded by UK’s Department of Energy
and Climate Change, the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation
and Nuclear Safety of Germany and most recently also the Climate and Development
Knowledge Network (CDKN). As reegle is financed by public money, using the most
efficient and cost-effective systems to operate is mandatory.
Going back to the portal’s inception in 2006, modern technologies have always been
seen as key to the upkeep of the portal; much more so than large manpower. The idea
of sharing data und avoiding duplication thus has a very strong appeal to its operators.
Being a relatively new field, Linked Open Data technology is also an opportunity for
reegle to take a spearheading role. In this position, reegle now acts as much more than
an information gateway. It is also a source of expertise on the implementation of LOD
technologies for REEEP partners who are keen to take advantage of the possibilities
offered by the semantic web.
2 Web 3.0 and the Future of Data Providers
Over the last few years, a new paradigm has emerged in the IT scene: the shift from
the traditional “web of documents” towards a new “web of data.” This is driven by
the vision of a semantic web, a world where machines can “understand” how things
are connected and thus greatly increase efficiency, effectiveness and enjoyment for
providers and users of the WWW7. The shift from hypertext as html to hyperdata as
RDF has added a new dimension of semantics to information that is processed by
machines.
This new technology has been embraced by several major providers of information
such as the British government portal data.gov.uk and its US equivalent data.gov.
Publishing Linked Open Data is increasingly the method of choice for those organiza-
tions supplying data.
7
World Wide Web
2.1 Data on the Web or Data in the Web?
The real difference between the traditional web and what has become known as the
sematic web is the way in which information or data is actually published.
To understand the difference, Tim Berners-Lee’s8 5 Star Model, first presented in
2012, is useful. Michael Hausenblas9 explains the cost and benefits for publishers
based on this model.
Fig 1: Visualization of 5 Star Model, including the corresponding formats. (Source:
http://5stardata.info)
★
One star data is the first level of Open Data 10, data that is available to be used freely
in any possible context. Yet if information is contained in documents, for example in
a PDF file, it is difficult for others to use it in their own web portals.
Reegle will include PDF documents when they are available under an Open License,
but their contents cannot be directly integrated into reegle services.
★★
Even though still locked within a document, two star data is structured in a machine-
readable format. Proprietary software is needed to be able to use the information.
Some of the data that is relied on for reegle services, including some statistics, is ex-
tracted and converted to RDF from structured Excel sheets.
8
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Berners-Lee
9
http://sw-app.org/mic.xhtml#i
10
Data available in the web under an open license
★★★
Three star data is similar to two star data, only the data is now structured in a non-
proprietary format and is available to use for everyone on the web. Yet the actual data
is still “on the web” rather than “in the web” as an integral element.
Similar to two star data, reegle uses this kind of structured and freely available three
star data to provide relevant information in the clean energy context.
★★★★
Four star data is data “in” the web, meaning that important data now has its own
URI11 and is an integral part of the web itself. The native way to represent such data
in the web is RDF, but there are also other options.
Reegle has taken the decision to publish its data in the web by modeling the data and
giving things their URI (e.g: www.reegle.info/glossary/492/hydro-power.rdf). All of
the information on reegle in available via its SPARQL12 endpoint at data.reegle.info
as RDF.
★★★★★
Five star data is what the sematic web actually consists of: data in the web that is
interlinked and forms a tight net.
To actually weave the sematic web it is crucial to link such data in the web so that
people as well as machines can explore the related content. Reegle links its data to
external data in the web to support the increasing growth of the semantic web. In
order to ensure that its data is well linked to semantically related data, Reegle has
forged collaborations with other key organizations in the clean energy and climate
arena. One example is the “concentrated solar power” entry in the thesaurus, which is
linked to the related Wikipedia and ClimateTechWiki definitions
(http://www.reegle.info/glossary/1367/concentrated-solar-power.htm)
A quote from Rick Jelliffe 13 explains the difference between “on the web” vs. “in the
web” well: “…make a distinction between a resource being “on” the web or “in” the
web. If it is merely “on” the web, it does not have any links pointing to it. If a re-
source is “in” the web, it has links from other resources to it. [...] A service that has no
means of discovery (i.e. a link) or advertising is “on” the web but not “in” the web,
under those terms. It just happens to use a set of protocols but it
is not part of a web. So it should not be called a web service, just an unlinked-to re-
source.”
11
Unique Resource Identifier
12
SPARQL as the query language of the semantic web offers a powerful API to retrieve data
and manage complex queries over several data sources
13
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/1712
2.2 The Sematic Web is a Smarter Web
Keeping one’s data in “silos” is not a very cost-effective way of running a database. It
must constantly be updated and adapted to reflect new use cases or greater amounts of
information. In contrast, LOD technologies are very flexible in regards to these issues,
and after an initial set-up can significantly reduce running cost of maintenance.
Once a template for a certain webpage has been designed, the actual data can be re-
trieved from the source regularly and is only cached for a specified amount of time.
This means that once a dossier has been laid out as a template, the information will
stay up-to-date and relevant without further manual effort. This is a great benefit that
is exploited by reegle to ensure that its users have access to the latest data from their
field of interest.
Before LOD, the data providers that produced most data to publish or sell where re-
garded as the most valuable. Now, under this smarter approach, information provider
value is judged on whether it can channel data to wherever it is most useful. For
smaller organizations that combine (Linked) Open Data to suit a certain use case and
cater for it in a much more tailored fashion while also being able to rely on external
data providers, this can be a great advantage.
Publishing one’s data in the W3C standards as Linked Open Data also means special-
izing in what an organization does best – the web of data doesn’t know “data silos”
but views the entire net as one huge database. Therefore it is also a system of de facto
shared responsibilities, where different sources provide different facets of the full
picture. The full picture itself can also differ, depending on the mandate of an organi-
zation. Each web publisher can enrich their own data with whatever data is necessary
to round off the experience, make their points, and increase understanding for users.
Since each provider is only responsible for their particular share of the data, this in-
creases quality and efficiency while decreasing cost and effort for all data providers.
The whole idea can be compared to the onset of Adam Smith’s notion of increased
productivity through specialization. Division of labor has traditionally been seen as
increasing efficiency in production, and with the creation of content and data, this
claim is more valid than ever.
2.3 Semantically Linking People and Data
An important lesson learned during reegle’s shift to an LOD portal is the recognition
that just throwing out so-called Open Data is not enough. Since the inception of LOD,
more and more organizations have begun to publish their own data according to W3C
standards. But if this data is never taken up and used by external websites or applica-
tions, most of the added benefits of the semantic web go to waste. For this reason,
reegle has been actively approaching potential partner organizations to ensure a lively
exchange of experiences as well as integration of each other’s data.
One such fruitful collaboration has been established between OpenEI14 and reegle.
Like reegle, OpenEI produces and consumes Open Data and spearheads this devel-
14
OpenEnergyInformation, a service from the US National Energy Laboratory
opment in the US clean energy sector. Reegle uses OpenEI data within its clean ener-
gy dossiers, the country energy profiles. Reegle’s thesaurus-based glossary is linked
with corresponding terms from openei.org, and both sites display each other’s defini-
tion on top of other LOD definitions.
OpenEI is also one of the first beneficiaries of the new reegle API 15, a service based
on the SKOS16 -thesaurus for automated tagging and categorization of energy and
climate documents.
This project has also strengthened ties between reegle and other organizations such as
weADAPT and Eldis; these organizations are also part of the reegle API project. Fur-
ther collaborations have been established between reegle and ci:graps and the Clean
Energy Solution Center.
The technology is used to forge connections not just between people, but the data
itself is available in RDF graphs17; the non-proprietary RDF format that connects
concepts across different datasets through RDF triples18.
3 Application Areas of Linked Open Data
Decision-making on complex topics should be based on reliable and timely data. A
future web of Linked Open Data will enable several applications to support this pro-
cess.
3.1 Mashups Combining Related Datasets
So-called mashups are a valuable use case where data from several different sources
is combined in a defined way to allow the user an overview of the most relevant, reli-
able information on a certain subject.
For reegle this is a particularly interesting method to provide users with tools neces-
sary to accelerate the uptake of clean energy technologies. The first example of this
kind of mashup on reegle are the country energy profiles.
In its country energy profiles, Reegle now offers comprehensive and well-arranged
energy-related information on each of the world’s 243 countries and regions. A tem-
plate was originally designed and data sources explored. Reegle enriches relevant
external open data with information drawn from REEEP’s own database. On top of a
Wikipedia definition, all country profiles display a flag and relevant energy statistics
from established sources, and all reegle stakeholders (“actors”) active in the relevant
15
Application Programming Interface,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application_programming_interface
16
Simple Knowledge Organization System
17
RDF graphs consist of RDF triples
18
An RDF triple consist of: the subject (URI reference or a blank node), the predicate (URI
reference), and the object (URI reference, a literal or a blank node)
country. The statistics come from trusted sources such as UN, World Bank and Euro-
Stat and graph relevant trends such as clean energy generation and consumption.
Tools are another section of reegle’s country energy projects and act as a useful gate-
way for users looking for a wide range of tools.
Projects, Programmes and Projects outputs give a unique snapshot of activities on the
ground with information pulled from a variety of internal and external sources.
New sources are constantly being reviewed to see if they fit reegle’s high quality
requirements. If yes, and they also enrich the quality of the country energy profiles,
they will be added. Right now the country profile mash-ups are based on (Linked)
Open Data from UN Data, World Bank Data, DBpedia19, Eurostat, OpenEI20, DFID,
RESLegal, and REEEP with SERN. Since these sources are known keep their data
up-to-date, the country energy profiles always display the latest available information.
3.2 Complex Queries
Sematic search engines such as Wolfram Alpha 21 already give a hint of what is possi-
ble when machines can actually “make sense” of data. In the clean energy sector,
questions such “Which regions have the highest potential for solar power?” or “What
country has the highest feed-in tariff for renewable energy?” are of great relevance,
yet the answers can be difficult and tiresome to research. A sematic search engine will
be able to give an answer to such questions rather than display many documents that
may, or may not, include this information. This is another exciting method that could
help people take the right decisions based on reliable and accessible information.
3.3 Increased Social Context
Services such as Quora22 already exploit the connection between personal interest,
available resources and the fact that often several people are interested in the same
thing. Quora aggregates questions and answers to topics and allows users to collabo-
rate on them by editing questions and suggesting edits to other users' answers.
Information on “who knows about what” is well-suited to be integrated into the
knowledge of the sematic web, and the added dimension of personal interests will
bring a new depth to Linked Open Data.
19
Wikipedia datasets
20
OpenEnergyInfomation (US National Energy Laboratory)
21
http://www.wolframalpha.com/
22
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quora
4 LOD and Sustainable Development in Developing Countries
Ensuring relevant information about technologies, policy, best practice, statistics and
events is readily available for implementers and public servants is an important pillar
for sustainable development. Since reegle has a special focus on clean energy in de-
veloping countries, it is important that such local players can benefit from the increas-
ing amount of information that becomes available.
Recent studies show that by early 2012, some 65%23 of the African population and
76%24 of India’s population were users of mobile phones. In the future, an increasing
share of internet services will be accessed by smartphones. This is an exciting oppor-
tunity to increase outreach to those on the ground. By providing the right data in a
useful format, reegle appeals to app developers who come up with simple but effec-
tive web-based applications to assist in making the right decisions. An example of
relevant information in this context could be the details about feed-in tariffs in a given
region, which could actually determine the size and type of a solar project.
Another reason why connected datasets are so valuable for sustainable development is
that they can increase the grasp of abstract issues. Particularly in the energy sector,
information can be hard to understand. Keeping reegle’s target group in mind, English
will not be every users’ mother tongue. This is where context provides deeper under-
standing, and where semantically linking content is a contribution to sustainable de-
velopment that Linked Open Data can make.
5 Publishing and Consuming Clean Energy Data
Putting open energy data out there and providing it with added semantics via reegle’s
data portal increases the impact of knowledge brokers in the clean energy sector. Like
reegle, many such portals are funded by public bodies and aim to provide a service for
their users free of charge. Such organizations can certainly profit from the integration
of clean energy data and other appropriate Open Government Data, but at the same
time provide extended services for their users:
As mash-ups: provide knowledge dossiers on certain sectors by drawing to-
gether from several sources and making this information available in one
place
Publish their own datasets as (Linked) Open Data for other organizations to
continue making new connections
23
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-15659983 (November 2011)
24
Census India 2012, retrieved 2009-11-10 from www.censusindia.gov.in and
http://www.trai.gov.in/WriteReadData/WhatsNew/Documents/PR-TSD-Mar03052012.pdf for
mobile phone penetration.
Combine previously unconnected datasets to highlight new conclusions, pos-
sibly in a visual way
There is certainly a need for more Open Data on energy-related matters, and with
more datasets being published, more innovative models of integration will develop.
Reegle sees its role as a pioneering actor in the development and usage of clean ener-
gy data and will support other data providers who decide to head into the same direc-
tion.
5.1 reegle’s Available Clean Energy Data
reegle offers all its data in the LOD-standard RDF for external developers; they can
easily extract and use for free all reegle/REEEP data through the SPARQL endpoint
at reegle’s developers portal25.
Reegle datasets are published with resolvable URIs 26, in the approved RDF format.
There are at least 50 RDF links to other LOD datasets and the entire dataset can be
accessed via reegle’s SPARQL endpoint.
The reegle dataset is also part of CKAN’s27 data hub.
Reegle’s data is already used for mash-ups by numerous other players in the field of
energy, such as OpenEI, and this can be viewed as a good sign that the information is
relevant
6 Outlook
The main drivers behind Linked Open Data are NGOs, governments and the media.
At the moment, the media are started to catch up with the idea of providing their read-
ers with semantically related resources, while governments and NGOs see public
money best spent by allowing citizens to make free use of the data they produce – and
theoretically already own.
Reegle will continue to use and produce energy-related data while at the same time
providing the most cutting-edge information to the casual browser in a cost-efficient
way. Reegle also wants to ensure a swift uptake of Linked Open Data technologies in
developing countries by sharing its own experience with interested parties and sup-
porting newcomers to the LOD scene.
25
http://data.reegle.info/
26
e.g. www.reegle.info/glossary/1367/concentrated-solar-power.rdf
27
http://thedatahub.org/dataset/clean-energy-data-reegle
References
1. The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), http://www.w3.org/
2. W3C eGov Wiki (http://www.w3.org/egov/wiki/Linked_Data )
3. The Renewable Energy & Energy Efficiency Partnership (REEEP),
http://www.reeep.org
4. 5 Star Open data, http://5stardata.info/
5. Bauer, F., Kaltenboeck, M., Linked Open Data, The Essentials, 2011
(http://www.reeep.org/LOD-the-Essentials.pdf )
6. Alonso, J.M., Boyera, S. 2011 Open Government Data, Feasibility Study in Ghana
https://public.webfoundation.org/2011/05/OGD_Ghana.pdf
7. Linked Data – Connect Distributed Data across the Web, http://linkeddata.org/