<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Using Biomedical Ontologies for Data Representation and Man- agement in the Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI) System</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Carol J. Bult, Jim A. Kadin, Joel E. Richardson, Martin Ringwald, Janan T. Eppig, Judith A. Blake The Jackson Laboratory</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Bar Harbor, Maine</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="US">U.S.A.</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Structured vocabularies and ontologies are increasingly utilized for managing, annotating, and analyzing complex biological data. The Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI, http://www.informatics.jax.org) resource contributes to and utilizes a variety of vocabularies and ontologies to robustly capture and provide biological information about the laboratory mouse and its use as a model for human disease. Here we report on the power and complexity of using biomedical ontologies for data representation and management at MGI. MGI is a highly integrated database and software system integrating mouse genetic, genomic and phenotypic information including data on gene characterization, pathways, protein classifications, sequence, gene expression, alleles, phenotypes, diseases, and comparative gene data for mouse, human, rat and other mammals.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>The Gene Ontology (GO, http://www.geneontology.org) is
the most widely used vocabulary for providing connections
between proteins and their roles in the biological
organization. MGI is a founding member of the GO Consortium, and
actively participates in the ongoing development of GO, as
well as applying GO to functional annotation of mouse gene
products. MGI provide an automatically generated text
report, a tabular form view and a graphical display of GO
annotations in the gene function detail page. MGI also provide
comparative graphs of GO annotations for mammalian
orthologs. In addition, MGI hosts graphical and statistical
tools exploiting the hierarchical structure of the GO to aid in
visualization of annotations and the analysis of large data
sets such as microarray data.</p>
      <p>MGI has spearheaded the development of two other major
structured vocabularies in support of annotation and analysis
of mouse biology: the Mammalian Phenotype (MP)
Ontology, a widely adopted ontological model that enables
phenotype annotations to background-specific allelic genotypes at
varying degrees of granularity, this structured vocabulary
allows consistent annotation of mouse genotypes with
standard phenotype MGI is also the originator of the Adult
Mouse Anatomy (MA), it allows us to navigate through the
extensive dictionary hierarchies for the different
developmental stages, to locate specific anatomical structures within
those hierarchies, and to annotate an obtain the expression
results associated with those structures.</p>
      <p>MGI also incorporates Online Mendelian Inheritance in
Man (OMIM) terms to make similarity assertions between
mouse models and human disease; incorporates the Mouse
Anatomical Dictionary for describing expression data
during mouse embryonic development.</p>
      <p>Additionally, for mouse gene products functional
annotation, MGI start to use the Cell Ontology, the Mouse
Embryonic and Adult Anatomy Ontologies, the Evidence Code
Ontology, and PSI-mod to add additional information to a
Gene Ontology annotation. These combined ontology
annotations will be loaded into the database in the near future.
The structured vocabulary-based annotations assist in robust
and accurate data mining when posing such complex
questions in both computational and individual formats at MGI.
Though the use of multiple ontologies, MGI is able to
robustly represent many components of knowledge about the
mouse model system. While these ontologies are
independently developed, the concurrent use of them within the
MGI system illuminates some challenges in the intersection
of ontologies that MGI ontology developers and curators
work to address. For example, the MP and the GO
terminologies incorporate mouse anatomical terms from the
MA. Testing and updating the MP and the GO to accurately
reflect the canonical anatomy organization in the MA
requires resources and attention on a regular basis.</p>
      <p>MGI is a consortium of database resources with funding
obtained from NHGRI (HG00330 and HG02273),
NIH/NICHD (HD062499), and NCI (CA89713).</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>