=Paper=
{{Paper
|id=None
|storemode=property
|title=miRNAO: An Ontology for microRNAs
|pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-897/poster_5.pdf
|volume=Vol-897
|dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/icbo/DritsouTDML12
}}
==miRNAO: An Ontology for microRNAs==
miRNAO: An Ontology for microRNAs
Vicky Dritsou 1 , Pantelis Topalis 1 , Emmanuel Dialynas 1 , Elvira Mitraka 1,2 and Christos
Louis 1,2∗
1
Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas, Greece
2
Department of Biology, University of Crete, Greece
ABSTRACT in other popular ontologies. A decision we had to take while deve-
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short RNA molecules (∼22 nt long) loping miRNAO was to either borrow the existing terms and their
that act as gene regulators in many eukaryotes. By binding to definitions from other ontologies or to create our own concepts and
complementary strands of messenger RNAs (mRNAs), they induce define them regardless of the existing sources. Even though creating
translational repression or target degradation. Since their discovery our own terms would allow us to define them according only to our
in 1993 (Lee et al., 1993), they have received a lot of attention scope, we chose not to re-create those. Instead, we prefer to re-use
in the research area and some thousands of miRNAs have been the existing knowledge by importing them from other ontologies, in
reported in the literature; version 18.0 of miRBase (Kozomara and an attempt to facilitate knowledge sharing and reuse. Interoperabi-
Griffiths-Jones, 2011) contains 18.226 entries representing precur- lity among different databases is then easier achieved. The majority
sor miRNAs in 168 species, which express 21.643 mature miRNA of shared terms come from the Gene Ontology (GO) (Ashburner
products. et al., 2000) and the Sequence Ontology (SO) (Eilbeck et al., 2005).
Each of these small RNA structures regulates many target miRNAO is the first ontology designed to express all the infor-
mRNAs (Baek et al., 2008), while the detection of the targets mation related to miRNAs. Exploiting this ontology in different
is a great challenge for researchers. Besides the number of iden- knowledge bases can be very beneficial, both by extracting infor-
tified miRNAs that grows very fast, the experiments performed mation from each source and also by interchanging and deriving
aiming at detecting targets have also increased. Large data sets information from different sources.
of miRNAs and their experimentally detected targets are sto-
red in various databases. Examples of popular miRNA databases ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
are microRNA.org (Betel et al., 2008), miRBase (Kozomara and The work was supported by the Hellenic General Secretariat for
Griffiths-Jones, 2011) and TarBase 6.0 (Vergoulis et al., 2011). Research and Technology (MicroRNA project, 09SYN-13-1055)
Sharing knowledge among different knowledge bases is beneficial and, in part, by the VectorBase project (NIAID).
and can be achieved with the use of ontologies. The classification of
the aforementioned huge data sets under an ontology that expresses REFERENCES
the features of miRNAs and their functions can facilitate informa- Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis,
tion discovery and extraction, while it can also be used to inter-relate A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., Harris, M. A., Hill, D. P., Issel-
Tarver, L., Kasarskis, A., Lewis, S., Matese, J. C., Richardson, J. E., Ringwald, M.,
the databases and/or their schemata. Yet, there is no ontology repre- Rubin, G. M., and Sherlock, G. (2000). Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of
senting the necessary information regarding miRNAs. The only biology. Nat Genet, 25(1), 25–29.
ontology related to miRNAs is the Ontology for MicroRNA Tar- Baek, D., Villén, J., Shin, C., Camargo, F. D., Gygi, S. P., and Bartel, D. P. (2008). The
impact of microRNAs on protein output. Nature, 455(7209), 64–71.
get Prediction (Townsend et al., 2010), which only captures the Betel, D., Wilson, M., Gabow, A., Marks, D. S., and Sander, C. (2008). The
information required to express the prediction of targets and does microrna.org resource: targets and expression. Nucleic Acids Research, 36,
not fully cover all the aspects considered in the area. On the other D149–D153.
Eilbeck, K., Lewis, S. E., Mungall, C. J., Yandell, M., Stein, L., Durbin, R., and
hand, RNA Ontology (RNAO) (Hoehndorf et al., 2011) serves as an Ashburner, M. (2005). The Sequence Ontology: a tool for the unification of genome
upper ontology, while miRNAO has been instead developed as an annotations. Genome Biology, 6(5), R44+.
application ontology. Hoehndorf, R., Batchelor, C., Bittner, T., Dumontier, M., Eilbeck, K., Knight, R.,
Mungall, C. J., Richardson, J. S., Stombaugh, J., Westhof, E., Zirbel, C. L., and
In an attempt to capture and represent the existing knowledge Leontis, N. B. (2011). The RNA Ontology (RNAO): An ontology for integrating
regarding miRNAs and their functions, we have developed miR- RNA sequence and structure data. Appl. Ontol., 6(1), 53–89.
NAO. miRNAO has been designed according to the OBO Foundry Kozomara, A. and Griffiths-Jones, S. (2011). miRBase: integrating microRNA annota-
tion and deep-sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Research, 39(suppl 1), D152–D157.
Principles (OBO-Foundry, 2006), as these are described in the cur- Lee, R. C., Feinbaum, R. L., and Ambros, V. (1993). The C. elegans heterochronic
rent release. Moreover, the Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) (Simon gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14. Cell,
et al., 2006) has been used for the classification of the upper classes. 75(5), 843–854.
OBO-Foundry (2006). Available at http://obofoundry.org/crit.shtml.
Since many ontologies of the domain adhere to the conceptualiza- Simon, J., Santos, M. D., Fielding, J., and Smith, B. (2006). Formal ontology for
tion of BFO, interoperability among them is thus achieved. natural language processing and the integration of biomedical databases. Int J Med
The set of concepts captured and described in miRNAO inclu- Inform, 75(3-4), 224–231.
Townsend, C., Huang, J., Dou, D., Dalvi, S., Hayes, P. J., He, L., chang Lin, W., Liu,
des among others molecular entities and parts, their structures, the H., Rudnick, R., and Shah, H. (2010). OMIT: Domain Ontology and Knowledge
processes they take place in, the functions and their roles within. Acquisition in MicroRNA Target Prediction. In OTM Conferences (2), pages 1160–
Some information related to miRNAs has already been expressed 1167.
Vergoulis, T., Vlachos, I., Alexiou, P., Georgakilas, G., Maragkakis, M., Reczko, M.,
Gerangelos, S., Koziris, N., Dalamagas, T., and Hatzigeorgiou, A. (2011). TarBase
6.0: Capturing the exponential growth of miRNA targets with experimental support.
∗ To whom correspondence should be addressed: louis[at]imbb.forth.gr Nucleic Acids Res.
1