<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Web Semantics. Elsevier (2012).
5. Cyganiak</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>A Linked Sensor Data Cube for a 100 Year Homogenised daily temperature dataset</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Laurent Lefort</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Josh Bobruk</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Armin Haller</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Kerry Taylor</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Andrew Woolf</string-name>
          <email>A.Woolf@bom.gov.au</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Australian Bureau of Meteorology</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Canberra</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="AU">Australia</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>CSIRO ICT Centre</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>GPO Box 664, Canberra</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="AU">Australia</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2010</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>1</volume>
      <issue>62</issue>
      <fpage>135</fpage>
      <lpage>151</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) has recently published a homogenised daily temperature dataset, ACORN-SAT, for the monitoring of climate variability and change in Australia. The dataset employs the latest analysis techniques and takes advantage of newly digitised observational data to provide a daily temperature record over the last 100 years. In this paper, we present a case-study to publish the ACORN-SAT as Linked Data. We use the Semantic Sensor Network ontology to deliver the publicly available metadata about the BOM weather stations and their deployment history as linked data. Additionally, for concepts that are not covered by existing vocabularies, we have developed domain ontologies to define the adjusted aggregate variables and associated parameters for the ACORN-SAT homogenised observation data, the BOM weather stations and the BOM Rainfall districts. We use the RDF Data Cube Vocabulary to publish the originally released tabular time series data and structure it into slices to support multiple views and query endpoints. We further describe how these linked open vocabularies have been used and combined in the context of this project to make this dataset linkable to existing or future linked open data resources. We also discuss the versatility of the new service for the consumers of the ACORNSAT dataset and uncover some issues which are specific to such long term climate data time series. The resulting Linked Sensor Data Cube is now accessible online via a pilot government linked data service built on the Linked Data API at lab.environment.data.gov.au.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd />
        <kwd>Ontology</kwd>
        <kwd>Semantic Sensor Network</kwd>
        <kwd>Data Cube</kwd>
        <kwd>Time series</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        The Australian Climate Observations Reference Network - Surface Air
Temperature (ACORN-SAT) dataset [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref2">1-3</xref>
        ], [10], [16-17], a flagship data product of
the Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BoM), has been developed for monitoring
climate variability and change in Australia. To produce this dataset, climate data
experts have used all the available information about weather station relocations,
changes in technology and changes in observational procedures to detect breakpoints
in time series and to compute adjustments for each station. The dataset provides a
daily temperature record over the last 100 years. Its primary objective is to underpin
better understanding of long-term climate change.
      </p>
      <p>The pilot government linked data service presented in this paper provides access to
the observation network metadata and to the data via an API which allows users to
retrieve subsets of the published data. We have combined and extended a number of
available ontologies to develop this capability, in particular the W3C Semantic Sensor
Network ontology [4] and the W3C RDF Data Cube vocabulary [6]. The originally
released tabular data has been transformed into a Linked Sensor Data Cube and is
now accessible online as a linked data service built on top of a Linked Data API.1</p>
      <p>The rest of this paper is structured as follows. In Section 2, we describe the
ACORN-SAT dataset and the observation network metadata. In Section 3, we
describe the role of the Semantic Sensor Network (SSN) and RDF Data Cube
ontologies in the ACORN-SAT Linked Sensor Data Cube structure and in Section 4,
we describe how we have built the ACORN-SAT API. In Section 5, we discuss the
opportunities for climate data producers to further improve their production and
publication to better match the increased demand for a transparent and reproducible
data production process.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Overview of the ACORN-SAT data and metadata</title>
      <p>The ACORN-SAT dataset originally released by the Bureau of Meteorology is
available2 as a set of tab-delimited data files which contain the homogenised
minimum and maximum temperature and the raw rainfall data recorded daily at each
selected site.</p>
      <p>
        The temperature time series for the 112 ACORN-SAT locations are sourced from a
set of single or composite stations selected according to the availability and quality of
the data [17]. 10 locations have been added and one removed since the previous
selection was made for the High Quality Temperature dataset [8], now superseded by
ACORN-SAT. This new dataset utilises improved analysis techniques ([
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ], [16], [17])
which exploit pairwise comparison between one station and up to 10 comparable
stations used as references. The algorithm applies differential adjustments to different
parts of the daily temperature frequency distribution to better estimate the deltas with
reference stations before and after an inhomogeneity. The ACORN-SAT method uses
all the available background information or metadata about station moves, changes in
technology and in observational procedures to identify and locate these breakpoints
and to evaluate and validate the adjustments. The general knowledge used for this
homogenisation process is described in several peer reviewed technical reports ([
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ],
[16], [17]).
      </p>
      <p>The site-specific knowledge is compiled in a separate station catalogue document
[3] which contains the description of the 112 ACORN-SAT weather station sites.
Each site is described in one page with a map and a photo of the site, the name,</p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>1 http://code.google.com/p/linked-data-api/</title>
        <p>2 http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/change/acorn-sat/
number, geographical coordinates and the locality of the station currently used plus
the list of the nearest ACORN-SAT sites and some text about the site and its history.
The information included in the site history is also available through a second
document, which explains the numbering system used by the Bureau of Meteorology
and the methods used to manage the changes of stations at each sites ([17], section 2.4
and 3.4). During each transition period, one of the sites, generally the old one, is kept
as a comparison site [14] for a minimum period of five years of parallel observations.
These modifications of the network structure are related to factors such as the
urbanisation of the original site, in particular, the construction of new buildings
affecting the quality of the observations, and the systematic transfer of bureau-staffed
sites from city centres to airports. For example, the Darwin observations have been
recorded at the Darwin Post Office (PO) from 1910 to 1942, and at two different sites
at the Darwin Airport (AP), from 1941 to 2007 and from 2001 to now, with an
overlap period of one year for the first transition and of just under six years for the
second transition.</p>
        <p>The BoM system allows for the same station code (014015) to be used for two
different sites at different periods: from 1941 to 2001, it is used for a first location at
the airport, which is later turned into a “comparison” station (014040) and from 2011
to now, it is used for a second location.</p>
        <p>The six-letter station codes are “logical” codes used by the Bureau of Meteorology
for the publication of observation data and station metadata for single or composite
stations. In the other BoM systems, the raw data, from which the ACORN-SAT data
is derived, appears as three separate time series with three different codes: 014016 for
the Darwin Post Office station, 014015 for the Darwin Airport Station and 014040 for
the Darwin Airport Comparison station. The current or last known location of a
station with a given BoM code can be retrieved from the BoM Weather Station
Directory.3 For Darwin, we have three different physical sites: the Post Office site and
two airport sites (AP1 and AP2) which are one kilometre away from each other.</p>
        <p>Table 1 shows the sub-phases and the key relationships between them from three
distinct perspectives: the physical weather stations deployed for each phase, and the
BoM and respectively ACORN-SAT time series for these stations. The information
included in this table is important for users wishing to compare the homogenised
ACORN-SAT data with raw or adjusted data sourced from these stations.</p>
        <p>There is not enough useable information prior to 1997 [16] about the additional
“minor” moves and the changes in the instrumentation which have occurred at each
site to reconstruct the full sequence of changes.
3 http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/cdo/about/sitedata.shtml</p>
        <p>PHYSICAL STATIONS</p>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-1">
          <title>COMPOSITE OR SINGLE</title>
          <p>STATIONS (BOM)</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-2">
          <title>HOMOGENEISED STATIONS (ACORN-SAT) Darwin AP1</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-3">
          <title>Darwin</title>
          <p>AP2
014016
(PO)
014015
(AP)</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-4">
          <title>Darwin AP1</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-5">
          <title>Darwin</title>
          <p>AP2
014040
(AP
comp)
AP1</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-6">
          <title>Darwin</title>
          <p>PO
014016
014016 + 014015
overlap
014015
014040 + 014015
overlap
014015
Darwin
PO
014016
014016
014015
014015
014040
014015
014015
PO
PO
AP1
AP1
AP2
AP2</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>The ontologies used in the Linked Sensor Data Cube</title>
      <p>Representation of the station history with the SSN ontology
Period</p>
      <p>The deployment sequence for each site is divided into three sub-phases with a
predeployment at the beginning and a post-deployment at the end, to specify when two
stations are used in parallel and a standalone phase for the middle period (Fig. 2).
Using the SSN and the DOLCE Ultra Lite4 (DUL) ontologies, we can define the
ACORN-SAT deployment class and its three sub-classes for the pre-deployment,</p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>4 http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DUL.owl</title>
        <p>standalone operation and post-deployment sub-phases. We reuse the dul:follows
and dul:overlaps properties to specify the temporal relationships between phases
and sub-phases (Fig. 3). The nature of the sub-phase is also documented through the
URI scheme used for the instances of the deployment and sub-deployment classes
shown in this figure.
3.2</p>
        <p>Structure of the ACORN-SAT data cube</p>
        <p>The RDF Data Cube vocabulary [6] is a vocabulary for the publication of statistical
data in RDF [5], published by the W3C Government Linked Data working group.5 Its
design has been influenced by earlier efforts like SCOVO6 and by the Statistical Data
and Metadata Exchange (SDMX7) data model. The result is a versatile specification
which can be applied to a large range of application domains.8</p>
        <p>The design of the ACORN-SAT Linked Sensor Data Cube is based on the Bathing
Water Linked Data pilot9 developed by the UK Environment Agency to meet its
obligations under the EU Bathing Water Directive to report weekly on the water
quality measured at more than 500 sampling sites. The URI10 and API schemes11
developed for this project apply the URI Sets design principles defined for the UK
government [7].</p>
        <p>The ACORN-SAT data cube has four dimensions, one for the ACORN-SAT site
and three for the date of the observation. Each observation contains three daily
measures: the minimum and maximum temperature, the rainfall amount and two
additional boolean attributes to indicate if there are missing values. Each
ACORNSAT observation refers to a date, or more precisely, to a 24 hour interval during
which the maximum and minimum temperature and the amount of rainfall have been
measured. For this purpose, we use the interval:CalendarInterval class
from the UK interval ontology12 and the URI pattern13 for a 24 hour period starting
and ending at 09:00AM.14</p>
        <p>The data cube itself is divided into slices using the site id first, and then the year
and month of the observation. All the slices are compound observations enriched with
some extra statistical attributes. For the temperature measures, we pre-compute the
minimum, maximum, mean, and standard deviation indicators and the count of
available measures for the time series period. For the rainfall measure, we have the
maximum, the sum and the count of available measures. The slice size is provided to
support the estimation of data quality factors e.g. the percentage of missing data
5 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/
6 http://vocab.deri.ie/scovo/
7 http://www.sdmx.org/
8 http://wiki.planet-data.eu/web/Datasets
9 http://environment.data.gov.uk/lab/
10 www.epimorphics.com/web/wiki/bathing-water-quality-structure-published-linked-data
11 http://environment.data.gov.uk/lab/doc/api-bwq-reference-v0.2.html
12 http://reference.data.gov.uk/def/intervals
13 http://www.epimorphics.com/web/wiki/using-interval-set-uris-statistical-data
14 Example: http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/gregorian-interval/2005-06-05T09:00:00/PT1D
points for each measure. The start and end dates of the period are encoded as
interval:CalendarInstant instances. Fig. 4 shows the relationships between the
dataset, the slices and the observations and illustrates how the URI scheme mirrors
the data cube structure. Inserting keywords like station, year and month into the URI
makes it easier to interpret and reduces the risk of errors by end users. In the figure
we use the notation “{...}” within a URI to generically represent many URIs of the
indicated pattern.</p>
        <p>With such a scheme, it is possible to configure the Linked Data API15 with two
types of endpoints: item endpoints to access the data attached to an instance and list
endpoints to access the sub-objects (Table 2).
http://lab.environment.data.gov.au/data/acorn/climate/slice/station/014015/year List of all sub-slices</p>
        <sec id="sec-3-1-1">
          <title>LDA ENDPOINT</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-1-2">
          <title>Item data for station slice</title>
          <p>15 http://elda.googlecode.com/hg/deliver-elda/src/main/docs/index.html</p>
          <p>In the Linked Sensor Data Cube, the coupling of the two ontologies is done at two
levels (Fig. 5): ssn:Observation and qb:Observation are tied together via
acorn-sat:Observation; acorn-sat:TimeSeries is also defined as a
qb:Slice and a ssn:Observation.</p>
          <p>The links between observations and sensors are defined for time series, but not at
the level of individual data points. This approach is preferred because of the size of
the ACORN-SAT dataset (~ 61 million triples). For the same reason, we have not
generated the links between qb:Observation and qb:DataSet instances.</p>
          <p>The datatype properties attached to the acorn-sat:Observation and
acorn-series:TimeSeries classes are imported from two purpose-made
ontologies: sat.owl (Fig. 6) and time-series.owl.</p>
          <p>Pre-existing definitions for minimum temperature and maximum temperature are
not applicable for the ACORN-SAT dataset because they do not specify the
boundaries of the time interval during which the daily observations are made and that
they are the output of a homogenisation algorithm used to adjust the original
measurements. The dotted arrows in Fig. 6 represent domain and range axioms.
The Expert Team on Climate Change Detection and Indices [17] has specified the
statistical attributes which can be attached to monthly or annual slices. We have
transformed these definitions into an ontology16 and used it to characterise the
acornseries properties when possible.</p>
          <p>These properties are (respectively) used in the observations and time series
instances and are also registered in the Data Structure Definition (DSD) instance
16 http://purl.oclc.org/NET/ssnx/etccdi
which documents the dimensions, measures, and attributes of the Linked Sensor Data
Cube (Fig. 7).</p>
          <p>We have found that the declarations of the observed properties in the SSN
ontologies as classes are not directly compatible with their declarations in the RDF
Data Cube as properties. Further investigation is needed to define a common ontology
design pattern to bridge the two ontologies. The registration of the properties in the
DSD is also an aspect of the RDF Data Cube vocabulary which the W3C Government
Linked Data working group has identified as an area for further work.
4</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>The ACORN-SAT Linked Sensor Data service</title>
      <p>The ACORN-SAT Linked Sensor Data service17 uses open source software such as
the SESAME triple store18 and the ELDA19 implementation of the Linked Data API.
The architecture of our solution is shown in Fig. 8.</p>
      <p>t
lfa s
FD ilfe</p>
      <p>R</p>
      <p>Apache
(Reverse Proxy)</p>
      <p>LTHM LSPRAQ
Apache
Tomcat</p>
      <p>F
D
R</p>
      <p>Amazon
Production</p>
      <p>Development</p>
      <p>Environment
iLkedn IaPA
LEAD taD
r
o
t
c
e
l
e
s
r
e
w
e
i
v
r
e
t
t
a
m
r
o
f</p>
      <p>API spec
acorn.ttl
SELECT ?item
WHERE {…}</p>
      <p>DESCRIBE ACORN-SAT
&lt;x&gt; &lt;y&gt; ontologies
Sesame API
RDF triple
store</p>
      <p>D2RQ
mapping</p>
      <p>file
Python
scripts</p>
      <p>D2RQ Server
D2RQ Engine</p>
      <p>SQL
PostgreSQL
SPARQL/LD</p>
      <p>Client
lab.environment.</p>
      <p>data.gov.au</p>
      <p>Browser
s
r
e
m
u
s
n
o
c
T
A
S
N
R
O
C
A</p>
      <p>P
T
T
H</p>
      <p>We mapped the tabular time series data of the original ACORN-SAT to RDF using
D2RQ and custom-built Python scripts. The mapping file for D2RQ is configured to
produce RDF data according to the ACORN-SAT ontologies (see above). We used
Jena EyeBall20 to validate the linked data because of the dependencies on several
RDF(S) vocabularies. Since ACORN-SAT is a relatively static data set (we expect no
more than one update per year), the generation and validation tools are deployed
outside of the production environment.
17 Accessible via http://lab.environment.data.gov.au/
18 http://www.openrdf.org/
19 http://elda.googlecode.com/
20 http://jena.apache.org/documentation/tools/eyeball-getting-started.html</p>
      <p>For the configuration of the Linked Data API we exploited the URI and API
scheme introduced in section 3.1 to define all the item and list endpoints which give
access to all the individual observations (Fig. 9, Fig. 10) and slices (Fig. 11, Fig. 12)
but also to the site metadata for each time series (Fig. 13). The site data is also
enriched with additional information from the Weather Station Directory21 in
particular the rainfall district22 and state.</p>
      <p>Due to the size of ACORN-SAT (~61million triples) we have put particular focus
on the usability (performance) of the Linked Data API. We defined custom viewers
for the different list endpoints in order to avoid expensive DESCRIBE SPARQL
queries. Our production environment serving lab.environment.data.gov.au runs on an
Amazon cloud with ELDA scaling horizontally at peak demand. Since our data is
static, we only replicate ELDA and its cache, but access only a single Sesame
triplestore instance.
21 ftp://ftp.bom.gov.au/anon2/home/ncc/metadata/sitelists/stations.zip
22 http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/cdo/about/rain-districts.shtml</p>
      <p>The common foundations of the URI and API schemes (see Fig. 3 and Table 2
above) and the ability to browse the data are important features for new users wanting
to rapidly build on the ACORN-SAT data.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>
        We have uncovered multiple challenges during this first attempt to apply the SSN
ontology and the RDF Data Cube vocabulary to long term climate data time series.
The first challenge is the volume and diversity of metadata which needs to be
captured beyond the transitions and overlaps between the deployment phases
discussed above. The changes in the sensor locations, technologies and observation
procedures ([
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ], [11]) are not the only categories of events which are recorded in the
Station Catalogue document [3]. For example, the construction of buildings and the
growth of vegetation close to a weather station are also noted because they can have a
significant impact on the quality of the observations. There are also more specific
inhomogeneities discussed in other publications [17] e.g. the creation of a substantial
artificial lake in Canberra (Lake Burley Griffin) about 4 km west of the observation
site. Approximately half of the adjustments done on the ACORN-SAT minimum and
maximum temperature values [16] are supported by metadata records of which 80%
were linked to station moves. With the help of the SSN ontology, we have captured
the major moves which, in Australia, have occurred mainly in the 1940s and the
1990s when the sites of observations were transferred from town centres to airports.
For long-term time series of extremes measurements such as ACORN-SAT, the
change of observation times are also critical. In Australia, before 1964, about 30% of
the weather stations used a 0000-0000 day. In 1964, the BoM switched to the current
0900–0900 standard. We have found that the available MET ontologies define the
minimum and maximum temperature but not the limits of the 24 hour period used to
record them.
      </p>
      <p>The second challenge is to answer the public demand to have a more transparent
homogeneisation process. The ACORN-SAT peer review [10] states that “a list of
adjustments made as a result of the process of homogenisation should be assembled,
maintained and made publicly available, along with the adjusted temperature series.
Such a list will need to include the rationale for each adjustment”. We have not
investigated if it would be beneficial to use the W3C PROV-O23 ontology or to add
new slices to our current data cube structure for this purpose. We know that more
ontology work is needed for the definition of breakpoints, of the data structures used
by percentile-based transfer functions and the parameters used by these algorithms
[18].</p>
      <p>The third challenge is to help the climate science community to create consistent
and comprehensive climate data resources ([13], [15]). We have learned that the
dependencies between the datasets published by national and international
organisations are hard to document, partly because the numbering scheme can be a
source of confusion. One possible approach is to extend the VoID24 vocabulary to
manage these relationships at the level of the slices of a RDF Data Cube rather than at
the level of the data cube itself.
23 PROV-O: The PROV Ontology http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/
24 Vocabulary of Interlinked Datasets (VoID) http://vocab.deri.ie/void/</p>
      <p>The fourth challenge is to link the ACORN-SAT data to other datasets. We provide
two main ways of how other data sets can link to ACORN-SAT. Like Patni et al [12],
we have linked the BoM stations to their associated GeoNames25 features. We also
provide temporal slices for each year of observation and consequently, we have 100
temporal slices that could be linked from other temporal data sets.
6</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>The publication of this data set represents a milestone in e-government in
Australia—it is the first linked data published by the Australian Government’s open
data sharing initiative known as data.gov.au.</p>
      <p>We believe that the explicit support for metadata attachment as offered by the
linked data approach presented here is of ongoing importance to the publication of
climate data, and may help to enrich the public debate about the scientific foundations
for climate science.</p>
      <p>By coupling the SSN ontology and the RDF Data Cube vocabulary, we are able to
capture the station history and to attach it to the data at the right level of temporal and
spatial granularity. The well designed URI and API scheme makes the data cube
structure easier to understand and navigate by all both producers and consumers of the
linked data.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>This project was funded by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology under the
National Plan for Environmental Information initiative. Part of this research was
conducted as part of the CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country National Research
Flagship and the Sensor and Sensor Network Transformation Capability Platform.</p>
      <p>Thanks to Alexander Coley (UK Environment Agency), Dave Reynolds, Stuart
Williams, Ian Dickinson (Epimorphics) for the shared material on the UK Bathing
Water project.</p>
      <p>Thanks also to Benedikt Kämpgen (AIFB, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology and
W3C Government Linked Data working group) for the suggestion to publish sensor
data as statistics26 and to couple the RDF Data Cube and the SSN ontologies.
7
25 http://www.geonames.org/
26 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Data_Cube_Vocabulary/Use_Cases</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <source>Australian Bureau of Meteorology: Report 3a - ACORN-SAT analysis and results document</source>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Australian</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Bureau of Meteorology: Report 4 - ACORN-SAT surface air temperature observing methods document (</article-title>
          <year>2011</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>