<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Opinion Mapping: Information Visualization Approaches for Comparative Sentiment Analysis</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>IQ Gateway</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>General Terms Algorithms</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Experimentation, Human Factors</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>William H.Hsu</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>In this position paper, we discuss the problem of extracting information about chronic diseases from the large volume of text written in health blogs, mailing lists, forums, and other electronic venues, then making this information accessible via structured queries, while analyzing it to map out patterns among the opinions and demographics of users. Information retrieval systems exist for spatially-referenced demographic data about diseases such as diabetes and their therapies, but as in the case of communicable diseases, the databases that contain such data are manually populated. For example, in information portals such as HealthMap.org, which are searchable by location and disease, the data are user-reported and collaboratively maintained, but not automatically extracted from text. Furthermore, there is as yet no automated means of relating sentiments expressed by users in their text postings to their semistructured profile data. This is because the primary sources for this kind of information have been statistical surveys such as opinion polls, where text responses are often human-interpreted and demographic analysis is done post hoc, rather than as part of an information retrieval and extraction task. These limitations indicate a present need for text summarization techniques that integrate quantitative information extraction - which captures symptoms, diseases, and complications of diseases - with opinion summarization.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;sentiment analysis</kwd>
        <kwd>social networks</kwd>
        <kwd>geoinformatics</kwd>
        <kwd>opinion mining</kwd>
        <kwd>subjectivity</kwd>
        <kwd>information extraction</kwd>
        <kwd>information visualization</kwd>
        <kwd>human-computer interaction</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Categories and Subject Descriptors</title>
      <sec id="sec-1-1">
        <title>H.3.3 [Information Storage and Retrieval]: Information search</title>
        <p>and retrieval – clustering, relevance feedback, selection process;
H.2.8 [Database Management]: Database applications – data
mining, spatial databases and GIS</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>1. INTRODUCTION</title>
      <p>In this paper, we address the problem of information retrieval and
information extraction in subjective domains, with applications to
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for
personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are
not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that
copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. To copy
otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists,
requires prior specific permission and/or a fee.</p>
      <p>EuroHCIR 2012.</p>
      <p>Copyright 2012 ACM</p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>Praveen Koduru</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>Praveen.Koduru@gmail.com IQ Gateway, Inc.</title>
        <p>visualization of opinions – specifically, thematic mapping of
opinions. At present, there is a dearth of methods for integrating
user profile data for social networks with blog posts, tweets, and
other content from the associated social media. These limitations
present an integrative challenge for human-computer interaction
(HCI) and information retrieval (IR). Towards this end, the
specific aims of the research proposed espoused in this position
paper are as follows:
1.
2.
3.</p>
        <sec id="sec-2-2-1">
          <title>Aim 1. Extend known algorithms for named entity</title>
          <p>recognition and relationship extraction, to produce basic
summaries of diseases and treatments mentioned in texts.
The technical objective is to tag where basic entities and
opinions are mentioned in freely available text (including
both user posts and profiles), then map these tagged elements
in space, time, and by topic, to acceptable levels of precision
and recall.</p>
          <p>Aim 2. Adapt basic known techniques to the domain of type
2 diabetes – specifically, extracting data from text
discussions of diabetes that are archived from health blogs
and forums using web crawlers. This entails developing a
means of handling entities and quantitative data that have not
previously been extracted from text, such as information
concerning insulin and oral anti-diabetic drug dosage, HbA1c
levels, etc. Another functional requirement is some
mechanism for entity reference resolution, e.g., abbreviations
and synonyms, for known terms. Finally, a domain-specific
ontology of relevant symptoms, disease attributes,
complications, and treatments is proposed. For type 2
diabetes, this includes topics frequently discussed in health
blogs and forums: food groups, meal plans, nutritional
constraints, and conditions such as obesity that are linked to
diabetes. This shall facilitate information retrieval
applications such as question answering about meal plans
recommended by primary care physicians and specialists.
Aim 3. Develop methods for sentiment analysis and
improve existing ones, to summarize opinions and
discover patterns. The technical objective is to relate
demographic data extracted from text and profiles to
qualitative data – namely, the polarity of text at the
document, sentence, or aspect level, aggregated across
demographic categories such as geographic region of
residence. Objects of interest for sentiment analysis
include prescribed therapies and specifically side effects,
but can extend to disease aspects and complications.
The overall goal of this approach is to develop an integrative
technology for summarizing online text about chronic diseases,
capturing opinions from users’ posts and demographic data from
a combination of their posts and profiles, and finally using these
to discover global patterns indicated by the set of all text
documents. The central hypothesis of this work is that a
combination of entity and relationship extraction, driven by a
domain-specific ontology of terms, will result in more precise
and accurate summarization of opinions. This will increase the
usefulness of free-form text, written by users of social media, in
understanding patterns that are reflected in the opinions and
demographics of chronic disease patients.</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>2. SIGNIFICANCE</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>2.1 Information Extraction from Health Blogs</title>
      <p>The chief potential impact of the research framework and test bed
proposed in Section 1 is to provide assistive technologies to
public health analysts and health services analysts who are using
blogs, microblogs (e.g., Twitter), and other social media to
explore user opinions about chronic disease issues. As an
example, in the application domain of type 2 diabetes, these
include dietary treatments such as carbohydrate control,
complications such as gastroparesis induced by diabetes that may
pose digestive constraints, and recommendations of primary care
physicians, therapists, endocrinologists, nutritionists, etc.
The availability of mailing lists, blogs, wikis, and other electronic
media for content management and dissemination has resulted in
rapid growth in the volume of online text data containing
voluntarily expressed public opinions about health issues. While
general-purpose metadata tools exist for annotating this text, the
opinions themselves remain a largely unexplored source of
information about how chronic diseases affect populations.
Meanwhile, the task of relating content from these various
selfpublishing media to semi-structured profile data from their users
has not yet been effectively automated.</p>
      <p>We advocate development of application test beds and
experimental systems aimed at improving techniques for
information extraction, ontology development and mapping, and
text mining to identify opinion patterns. The potential progress in
these areas is due in part to the approach of combining
information extraction to discover disease mentions with
sentiment analysis to establish opinions, and in part to the
application of this approach to a new source of data: free-form
text describing user demographics, attributes of the chronic
disease of interest and its related entities, and opinions and
semistructured profile data.</p>
      <p>To help public health researchers tap into these freely available
but unexplored sources of opinions, we propose to develop
information extraction (IE) and summarization methods geared at
health blog postings and similar text. Such postings contain not
only opinions, and attribution information that can be used to link
them to the users who expressed them, but also factual data about
the posters and their opinions. This data can help place opinions
in a comparative context with population statistics, such as the
reporting frequency of symptoms, side effects, and complications.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>2.2 Ontology Development</title>
      <p>The research approach centers around using information
extraction to obtain structured data in the form of records about
chronic disease references in text, which are then linked to users
via relational data extracted from their profiles. However, the
body of relevant concepts in the healthcare domain and in the
clinical domain theory of each chronic disease is much broader.
Currently there exist pre-clinical (genomic and proteomic) and
clinical translational ontologies that contain information relevant
to diabetes, but they do not provide the requisite concepts for
mining free-form text written by lay users who are discussing
diabetes online. We propose to develop an ontology for text
mining in diabetes, and the mappings from extracted entities and
relationships into this ontology.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>2.3 Opinion Mining (Sentiment Analysis)</title>
      <p>This aspect of the proposed work focuses on a basic research
problem: sentiment analysis from text, also known as opinion
mining, whose objective is to determine from analysis of a written
document what the author’s attitude towards an identifiable topic
is. This attitude can be subjective or objective; it can be
identified as an evaluation (positive or negative), a declaration of
the author’s emotional attitude, or a expression intended to evoke
an emotional response in the reader. Subjects of interest include
chronic diseases, their features or aspects including symptoms,
complications, and treatments, and related health services.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>2.4 Current State of the Field</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>3. PROPOSED DIRECTIONS</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>3.1 Mining Social Media (Blogs, Lists, Wikis)</title>
      <p>As mentioned above in Section 2, our approach applies text
mining to blogs and social media, a new source of information
that is beginning to be studied for opinion and trending topic data,
but has not been analyzed for disease-related information that can
be related to these data. The novelty of our approach is that it
extends named entity recognition and relationship extraction to
the domain of understanding free-form text about aspects of
chronic diseases (specifically, opinions about type 2 diabetes, its
complications, dietary recommendations, and drug treatments). It
further develops methods for mapping these new entities and
relationships to the terms of an ontology for text mining, and
finally leverages the text contained in many online sources to
produce integrative summaries of disease mentions and associated
opinions.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-10">
      <title>3.2 New Theory and Methodology</title>
      <p>3.2.1 IR (Search Query-Driven) Workflow
In IR applications of automatic text summarization, a user enters a
free-form search query and views returned hits that are
summarized by topic and aspect – in this case, author opinion.
These hits may be organized by space and time. For example,
consider the case of a clinical health services analyst, public
health analyst, doctor, patient, or other concerned individual who
is interested in some aspect of a chronic disease. Such a user
typically enters a query into a general-purpose search engine and
is either directed to a domain-specialized web portal, also called a
vertical portal, or browses through documents housed in one.
We seek to advance the state of the field by supporting structured
queries, in which a user specifies fields and constraints in addition
to traditional search keywords. This is achieved by combining
quantitative text summarization (extraction of attribute values)
with recognition of entities and relationships. The collection of
documents may include some that are dynamically crawled from
the web in response to the query. The output consists of
structured tuples that are ranked by relevance to the query,
filtered to remove hits deemed insufficiently relevant, and finally
visualized in a map or timeline view. This view allows the user to
more freely explore information by performing interactive
manipulations such as online analytical processing or editing the
set of constraints.
3.2.2 IE and Summarization (Push) Workflow
IE applications of the proposed summarization technology can be
viewed as a more passive variant of the IR application described
above, from the user’s point of view. No initial query is supplied
by the user, but there is an implicit domain of interest from which
records should be displayed, corresponding to a combined set of
search terms and relevance criteria. When a small set of search
terms is known, the IE application can be formalized as a general
case of the IR application where “every possible query” is
enumerated, multiple crawls are conducted in advance, and the
union of all resulting hits is ranked and filtered.
3.2.3 Improved Access through Structured Queries
and Opinion Pattern Mining
This workflow is designed to provide analysts with better access
to spatiotemporal data. First, it supports approximate range
queries, such as: “return records of persons with fasting blood
glucose levels close to the non-diabetic range of &lt; 126 mg/dL”.
Second, it uses measures of semantic relatedness or similarity,
e.g., “return posts about adverse effects of Metformin whose
expressed sentiments are closest to those in this post”. Third, it
extracts information in Steps 1 – 3 that in Step 4 can be used to
generate thematic maps, which portray specific aspects of a
geographic region. In this research, the themes fall into two
categories: the first, demographic attributes and biostatistics
specified by the ontology – some disease-independent, and some
disease-specific; the second, quantized measures of opinion
polarity (i.e., degree of positive or negative sentiment). The
increased support for flexible queries and thematic map
generation, compared to IR without relationship extraction and
sentiment analysis, will help reveal patterns in the data through
interactive investigation.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-11">
      <title>4. TECHNICAL FOCUS AREAS</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-12">
      <title>4.1 Improvements and Refinements to Theory</title>
      <p>The following generic methods are applied in order to meet the
functional requirements presented in the preceding section. We
refer to them as cross-cutting because they are used in service to
all of the technical aims: entity and relationship extraction,
ontology development, and sentiment analysis.
4.1.1 Focused Crawling
In previous work on IE, applied to news summarization in the
domain of veterinary epidemiology, we used a combination of
topical and focused crawling. Topical crawling prioritizes pages
to be crawled based on user-provided terms (i.e., topics) and seeds
(i.e., links to initial pages), while focused crawling uses both
terms and pages labeled as positive or negative examples of
relevant documents. Once tag-formatted web documents (HTML
or XML) are crawled, text must be extracted from them.
The on-demand IR system described above functions by passing
the user query to a built-in web crawler that fetches hits from a
commercial search engine (in this case, Yahoo). The results are
combined with previously crawled documents, if any, and ranked
and indexed as a whole.
4.1.2 Information Extraction
The state of the field in IE for web articles describing disease
consists of: payload extraction (of text from HTML), baseline
named entity recognition (NER), and extraction of dates, times,
and locations in order to localize putative events. In addition to
general open natural language processing problems such as
coreference resolution (in particular, pronouns and other anaphora),
word sense disambiguation, and canonicalization of dates, other
IE problems that remain unsolved include: resolving alternative
abbreviations and synonyms for diseases, disambiguation of place
names, associating quantities of persons affected with diseases
mentioned, and deduplication of reports. The foundation of our
proposed work consists of tasks known to be feasible, but for
which general-purpose solutions are still being manually adapted
to new domains in current practice: automated named entity
recognition and topic categorization. Typically, information
extraction is restricted to named entities (Person, Organization,
Location, and in our domain, Disease), but attributes such as
“causative agent” are not always extracted. Neither are dates,
times, quantities, and place names that support the extraction of
full tuples of a relationship set. This open problem is of critical
significance and is therefore the first of our specific aims.
4.1.3 Web 2.0
The term Web 2.0 describes an eclectic set of technologies for
online interoperability and collaboration. While it includes search,
hyperlinking, collaborative authorship and tagging, web services,
and syndication, our IE approach focuses on the authorship,
tagging, and syndication aspects. Collaborative authorship and
editing are mainstays of specialized wikis, but many forums also
provide tools for collaboration, from discussion threading and
editing history to user profiles, our main source of demographic
information besides posts. We will crawl or aggregate profile
data, which in some social network and blogging systems (e.g.,
LiveJournal) is published as a publicly available feed. Another
source of relational data is the link structure expressed by
collaborative tagging, especially annotation by other users cf.
Wikipedia, social bookmarking cf. Delicious, social citation cf.
CiteULike, and collaborative recommendation cf. Digg, Reddit,
and StumbleUpon. We intend to make use of available content
management functionality in health wikis and electronic groups.
Syndication provides a modern mechanism for refreshing content
that is generally more efficient than periodic crawls. We will
make use of these three categories of Web 2.0 features and other
available content management functionality to assist in the
extraction of relational tuples from free text writings online, and
in their validation and ranking.
4.1.4 Map and Timeline Visualization
Finally, the generation of views as shown in Figure 1 is a key
application of our second primary aim, to build a domain
ontology for text mining in diabetes blogs and then develop
automated mappings from entity recognition systems to this
ontology, and our third, to extract the objects and polarity of
opinions.</p>
      <p>Thematic maps, including opinion maps, help reveal global
patterns and trends that may have been previously hidden. By
visualizing the attributes and related entities of a disease and
depicting their variation across space and time, they allow the
user to interactively discover these trends. Most previous
approaches to construction of thematic maps have been based on
electronic medical records and reports compiled by medical
providers. The value added by IE operations that automatically
populate databases and thematic maps is that they can be applied
to the large volume of text that is voluntarily submitted on a daily
basis to venues listed at the beginning of this section.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-13">
      <title>5. EXAMPLE: HEALTH BLOGS</title>
      <p>The primary value added in adapting the IR and IE workflows
described above is an increased capability to explore patterns and
trends expressed by an entire collection of health blog posts. As a
running example, consider the public health analyst who is
interested in charting trends in the use of fast-acting insulin by
diabetics. Users often share information about the brands of
insulin they use and post opinions about their effectiveness. The
following is a post archived on diabetesforums.com which is
marked up (with a color coding to distinguish entity types and
relationship types):</p>
      <p>Since I have found out in a previous thread I posted I
can use most pen needles with the Novolin 4 pen I
got(Haven't used it yet since I have only Humalog for
rapids so far), I am here with another question.</p>
      <p>I have only used Humalog for a rapid... Does anyone
have any insight as to how it compares to Novolog?
In this post, the user is requesting information comparing two
drug products (brands of fast-acting insulin, referring to specific
delivery mechanisms (pen syringes), eliciting opinions from
fellow users, and specifying a requested comparison between
named products. Opinions voiced by respondents to this post
then discuss how heat-tolerant each brand is, how quickly it acts,
and other aspects that we refer to as facets. Achievement of our
primary aims will allow the analyst to chart reported biostatistics
and opinions, not only about products but about trends, such as
the number of units of postprandial insulin taken per gram of
CHO.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-14">
      <title>6. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS</title>
      <p>Thanks to Chengxiang Zhai for fruitful discussions about the IR
framework. Thanks also to Tim Weninger, Svitlana Volkova,
Surya Teja Kallumadi, Wesam Elshamy, and Andrew Berggren
for development work on an early prototype of the information
extraction system.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Aljandal</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hsu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W. H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bahirwani</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Caragea</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Ontology-Aware Classification and Association Rule Mining for Interest and Link prediction in Social Networks</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proceedings of the AAAI 2009 Spring Symposium on the Social Semantic Web</source>
          . Menlo Park, CA, USA: AAAI Press.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Brownstein</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Feifeld</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          ).
          <source>HealthMap - Global Disease Alert Mapping System. Retrieved January 25</source>
          ,
          <year>2010</year>
          , from http://www.healthmap.org.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Craven</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kumlien</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1999</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Constructing biological knowledge bases by extracting information from text sources</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology</source>
          (pp.
          <fpage>77</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>86</lpage>
          ). Menlo Park, CA, USA: AAAI Press.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jiang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zhai</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Exploiting domain structure for named entity recognition. Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference/the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (HLT-NAACL</article-title>
          <year>2006</year>
          ), (pp.
          <fpage>74</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>81</lpage>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jiang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zhai</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Instance Weighting for Domain Adaptation in NLP. Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL</article-title>
          <year>2007</year>
          ), (pp.
          <fpage>264</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>271</lpage>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kim</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H. D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zhai</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Generating Comparative Summaries of Contradictory Opinions in Text</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM</source>
          <year>2009</year>
          ), (pp.
          <fpage>385</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>394</lpage>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ling</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mei</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Q.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zhai</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schatz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B. R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Mining multifaceted overviews of arbitrary topics in a text collection</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD</source>
          <year>2008</year>
          ), (pp.
          <fpage>497</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>505</lpage>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yangarber</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Steinberger</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Best</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>von Etter</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fuart</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Horby</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Combining Information Retrieval and Information Extraction for Medical Intelligence</article-title>
          .
          <source>NATO Advanced Study Institute on Mining Massive Data Sets for Security.</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yue</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zhai</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Opinion Integration Through Semisupervised Topic Modeling</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proceedings of the 17th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW</source>
          <year>2008</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>