<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Towards a Taxonomy of Energy-E Techniques cient Control</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Jo~ao Sequeira</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Paulo Carreira</string-name>
          <email>paulo.carreirag@ist.utl.pt</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>INESC-ID and Instituto Superior Tecnico, Avenida Prof. Cavaco Silva</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Tagus Park, 2780-990 Porto Salvo</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="PT">Portugal</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Energy usage in buildings can be reduced by coordinating devices to achieve higher energetic e ciency. Even conceptually simple techniques such as daylighting, occupancy based control or scheduling are known to achieve reductions on energy costs in the order of 20-30%. In fact, multiple techniques have been proposed over the years and, to date, there is no reference text giving them a systematic treatment. In this article we reviewing and categorizing existing techniques applicable the problem of energy-e cient control into an appropriate taxonomy.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>E cient energy usage in buildings is determined primarily by the building's
envelope, by behavioural patterns of occupants and increasingly by the available
technology to coordinate devices to reduce energy consumption, while delivering
the same level of service.</p>
      <p>Building Automation Systems (BAS) increasingly feature digital networks of
electronic devices, equipment and appliances that communicate with each other
to achieve greater occupant comfort while operating more e ciently. A building
controlled by a BAS is commonly referred as a Smart Building (SB). SB are
becoming popular and associated with the idea of leveraging the BAS to reduce
energy consumption, e.g., by intelligently switching loads based on occupancy
information.</p>
      <p>
        Energy usage in buildings can be understood in terms of energy consumption
reduction and energy conservation. The rst aspect has to do with a rational
use of appliances avoiding turning them on or turning them on partially or
even with lower level of service, reducing the quality service. The second aspect
refers to the e orts made for reducing energy consumption in buildings and
environmental pollution [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ]. It can be achieved through e cient energy use
(when energy use is decreased while achieving a similar outcome), or by reduced
consumption of energy services. Through appropriate control strategies, devices
and equipment can be coordinated to help both energy consumption reduction
and energy conservation. These are called energy-e cient control techniques.
      </p>
      <p>This paper reviews and analyzes the existing energy-e cient control
techniques into a taxonomy. This work is of utmost importance to develop
models supporting the selection of alternative control techniques automatically. We
foresee such models will be required to develop a new breath of tools to
assist facility managers in appropriately commissioning their BASs with toward
energy-e cient control.</p>
      <p>Our text is organized as follows. In the next section the fundamentals
concepts of automated control are presented. Then, in sections 3 to 7 we overview
the di erent control techniques, their variants and how they in uence energy
usage and conservation. Finally, section 8 presents the taxonomy and section 9
concludes.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Concepts</title>
      <p>A useful abstraction when analysing energy usage is to consider that a
facility, a SB for the case, o ers services that support activities that take place
therein. Illumination, air renovation and temperature can be considered as
services. Services are implemented by equipment in given spaces, or parts of the
space called zones. Controlling in which part of the space a service is o ered is
called zoning. Equipments can also operate during designated periods of time
to meet a certain level of service. The level of service o ered by equipment can
be operated among other aspects by varying its output intensity. Greater level
of service usually means greater energy consumption. Therefore, it can be said
that equipments can be controlled according to the dimensions of space, time
and intensity.</p>
      <p>Conceptually, the most energy-e cient control system is one that delivers the
required level of service for the task in hand in the area (space) where the activity
is taking place and for the duration (time) of the activity. In practice, however,
and due to limitations of the equipment installation or the built environments,
it is only feasible to o er the level of service required for a given activity on a
larger zone, for longer period, and at excess level of service, therefore leading to
energy waste.</p>
      <p>To achieve energy e ciency many techniques or standard behaviours can
be applied, those are called energy-e cient control techniques. Combining this
techniques, o ce buildings can achieve huge reductions on energy wastes. Some
energy-e cient control techniques o er better gains than others, depending on
the buildings location or based on human presence rates inside the building.
Some of those techniques will be described further ahead.</p>
      <p>Ideally, a very e cient system should have a ne grain of control. The ner
the grain of control, the more e cient the system can be. This e ciency is
only realized if the system is perfectly adjusted to deliver the required level of
service, at the location and for the duration of each activity. Performing these
adjustments has a cost which is not negligible. The only way out is for such
control to be automated.</p>
      <p>Consider a meeting room where a manager stays behind to follow up on a
meeting. Let us assume that an energy-e cient task lighting scenario is activated,
where only the luminary over the zone of the space where the manager is sitting
is at full intensity while the rest are dimmed down. Consider, furthermore, that
all luminaries go fully o as soon as the manager leaves This scenario depicts
a very adequate control of the illumination service in terms of space, time and
output.
3</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Individualized control</title>
      <p>The ner the grain of the control of the equipment in terms of space, time and
output, the more e cient a system can be in delivering the service required
by the activities that take place. The fundamental dimensions of equipment
control, zoning, ow control and duration have important implications in energy
e ciency.
3.1</p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>Zoning</title>
        <p>Zoning mainly consists of circumscribing the actuation of equipment or o er
services within a space where it is most needed. For example instead of illuminating
a whole room to perform a certain a task, which is undertaken in a small area
within a room, only the area where the activity is taking place needs to be lit.
Surrounding areas could be lit with a lower level of illumination, providing for
user comfort still achieving energy consumption.</p>
        <p>We distinguish three granularity levels for Zoning which are \All", \Groups"
and \Individualized", being the last one where the granularity is ner. On the
"All" level one control command applies to all equipments and there are no
divisions. For example, consider that light intensity is available but that it applies
simultaneously to all units in the space. The energy waste can still be high if,
for example, certain zones in the space could be at full o . On the Groups
level, devices are grouped into that sets that may accept di erent commands.
For example, they can be switched independently therefore decreasing energy
consumption. The Individualised level is where the energy consumption is lower,
due to the higher granularity.
3.2</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>Flow control</title>
        <p>Flow control is a control technique that refers to the capability of controlling the
amount of output ow on a device. The fundamental principle of ow control
is that greater output requires more energy. Therefore, the amount of output
should be minimized by adjusting it to the requirements of the tasks being
performed in a certain space. For example, di erent level of service levels can be
used in o ces and in passageways.</p>
        <p>Depending on the type of device, we distinguish three common types of ow
control: binary discrete, multilevel discrete and continuous. The simplest type
of discrete ow control, is a simple on/o control. This rst level only allows
two states usually meaning that either the service is being o ered at full power
or is not being o ered at all. This is used for example to turn on/o HVAC
systems, luminaries or a group of luminaries. Multilevel allows to choose from a
small amount of prede ned levels of intensities, for example bi-level discrete ow
control, such as o -medium-full strategy which obtains energy savings by
interleaving luminaries on and o . Other multilevel discrete controls allow multiple
levels of service, common on luminaries and thermostats.</p>
        <p>Continuous ow control is capable of delivering a continuous variation of the
output of devices. Continuous ow control can be more e cient than discrete ow
control. This type of control is achieved through the use of a speci c electronic
dimming ballast for lighting, variable motor speed drives or even damper valve
controls, often applied in HVAC systems. Below, it will be detailed further.
3.3</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>Duration control</title>
        <p>The capability of precisely controlling the time window along which a certain
service can be delivered also results in energy savings. Once the activity is over
the service can be switched o . Two basic types of limitations exist to implement
such precise control. The rst one is that the control system does not know
when the activities requiring a certain service are taking place and the second
one is that control may actually be limited. Certain types of equipment display
hysteresis delays, and require a certain safety interval to be observed before being
switched back.
4</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Activity-based control</title>
      <p>Activity based control tries to optimize the control towards the activities that
are taking place in the space. Activities are performed for given periods of time,
require certain levels of service to be available. Since no system is actually capable
of knowing exactly the characteristics of the activity, the control is often based
on time and space occupancy prediction.
4.1</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>Schedule-based control</title>
        <p>Scheduling is understood as appointing commands to be executed by devices or
group of devices at de ned points in time, achieving a certain degree of
independent action. Scheduling is frequently to turn on or o lights on determined
schedules to meet the requirements of the activities that take place during those
same periods of time.</p>
        <p>However, scheduling is not limited to commanding devices at certain hours on
given dates. Schedules can be also activated or interrupted upon the occurrence
of an event or condition. Moreover, a schedule start time can be speci ed as
an o set to the event or condition. For example, consider changing the morning
switch-o time scheduling based on the season of the year. Another application
would be turning o the lights when people leave rooms. A oating schedule can
be used to solve to implement auto power on/o to solve this problem.
4.2</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>Occupancy-based control</title>
        <p>
          Occupancy control sensors are commonly used in indoor spaces using infra-red
or ultrasonic sensors to detect motion. When no motion is detected in a certain
space, it is assumed that the space is empty, and thus does not need to be lit.
There are two major types of actuation based on occupation detection:
movement detection switching and movement detection dimming. In motion detect
switching the occupancy sensor switch on/o devices (usually luminaries)
according to the motion detected in a room, in motion detect dimming the sensor
dims the light to a de ned level in the absence of motion. Both types of
actuation based on occupancy control to turn on/o or to dim the lights can result
in saving substantial amounts of energy [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
          ].
5
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Environmental harvesting</title>
      <p>Environmental Harvesting aims at taking advantage of external environment
conditions to save energy. In literature it is possible to see that there are three
major techniques, one applied to lighting systems and two applied to HVAC
systems. Daylight harvesting is applied to lighting systems and makes pro t of
solar light to dim or even to switch o lighting during the day time. Heat gain
is applied to HVAC systems and uses solar heat to reduce the use of energy
on HVAC systems. Free cooling is used with HVAC systems but in this case it
uses the outside cold air to reduce the use of HVAC systems during the night or
during the early hours of the morning.
5.1</p>
      <sec id="sec-5-1">
        <title>Daylighting</title>
        <p>
          Daylight is a non-uniform and dynamic form of illumination which, varies in
intensity, both spatially and temporally. Therefore, day lighting systems in order
to properly work, should be capable of dimming small sectors of interior spaces
independently. Using daylighting its possible to reduce in some cases 40% of
energy consumption in a commercial building [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
          ]. To achieve daylighting some
basic principles have to be ful lled. Buildings orientation should be such that
most of it is within the daylight zone, or even bring the light ballast higher,
so it can cover more area. Applying this technique in a proper way gives the
occupant the comfort and satisfaction it needs to work, and due to that his work
will improve [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>
          Using daylight harvesting with the proper orientation and symmetry of a
building it is possible to provide over 70% of the required ambient
illumination in a building during a year. If an electric lighting control system responds
properly to daylight harvesting, the electric consumption will be signi cantly
reduced [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
          ]. The main limitations of daylighting is that photo-sensors are not
precise enough|their performance depends mostly on their placement [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>
          Another important aspect of daylighting is the interaction with blind
controls. Automated blind controls will help control light intensity in the room.
With more natural light the system will turn o or dim the luminaries, causing
a reduction of energy consumption. To prevent excessive glare, the system can
also automatically close the blinds to avoid glare. An installation of a dimming
system with automatic blind control proved to be very e cient, creating a 27%
reduction in lighting energy use [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
          ].
5.2
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-2">
        <title>Heat gain</title>
        <p>
          Heat gain is the increase of temperature in a certain space from solar radiation.
As the daylighting technique, it also consists of controlling blinds or curtains in
order to maximize the environmental temperature in a building, also temperature
measurements are needed in order to understand the need of closing or opening
the blinds. The amount of heat gain varies depending on the sun strength and the
exposure of the window, it also depends on the material of which the building is
made of [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
          ]. The position and orientation of a building is crucial to maximize the
buildings heat gain. Heat gain technique can also use heat dissipation from other
devices, such as from lighting systems to increase the environmental temperature.
5.3
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-3">
        <title>Free cooling</title>
        <p>One way to reduce HVAC energy consumption consists of circulating cold fresh
air during the night that will cool the building avoiding the need of using HVAC
systems during the day. Another advantage if free cooling is that it is done in
o -peak hour bene ting from lower electricity tari s.
6</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Intelligent Load Control</title>
      <p>Buildings control load and Load management is the process of balancing energy
supply and consumption on a network or building by controlling the energetic
loads. There are two main ways of doing this, know as Load shedding and Load
shifting.
6.1</p>
      <sec id="sec-6-1">
        <title>Load shedding</title>
        <p>Load shedding is a deliberate switching o of electrical supply to some parts of
an electricity network. So basically, the available electrical power is rationalized,
by limiting the energy use or even cutting the energy supply on certain zones.
Sometimes there is a need to reduce energy demand very quickly to an acceptable
level, if not there might be a risk of turning the entire electricity network unstable
or even a completely shut down may occur.</p>
        <p>During the hot season, buildings normally have all their HVAC systems
working during the day which represents a huge energy consumption that can even
exceed, in some cases, the contracted energy power for the building,
representing an extra cost. Load Shedding can also be implemented to reduce energy
consumption in buildings in di erent ways. First, building areas may be limited
during the peak hours to a certain level of energy consumption which they
cannot be exceed even if consumers try to. Load shedding can be implemented by
turning o non-critical loads when a facility is being charged to a maximum for
power, in order to avoid exceeding the maximum contracted power supply.</p>
        <p>Load shedding technique can also be implemented by performing the
dimming of lights in the building to reduce the energy consumption avoiding
exceeding the contracted energy power.
6.2</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-6-2">
        <title>Load shifting</title>
        <p>
          Load shifting is a way to manage energy loads, by advancing or delaying
consumption into periods of lower energy prices. The limitation is that in some cases
the consumer may actually need to perform the task at an appoint time. In this
way the consumer still accomplish the task while being at a lower energy price
when doing it [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
          ].
7
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Occupant buy-in</title>
      <p>User buy-in control techniques are techniques that take advantage based on
occupant characteristics in order to achieve an energy consumption reduction.
7.1</p>
      <sec id="sec-7-1">
        <title>Adaptive compensation</title>
        <p>
          Adaptive Compensation is a control technique that takes advantage of the human
adaptation to the surrounding environment to save energy. For example, to take
advantage of the fact that people need and prefer less light at night than they
do during the day [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
          ]. Therefore, lighting can be slightly dimmed at night due
to the fact that it is dark outside. Similarly in winter when people wear warmer
clothing and the air condition is not required to be so hot. It has been found
as well that users may tolerate a progressive regression of set points during a
period of time, for example the lowering of luminaries intensity to 70% over the
course of 20 minutes.
        </p>
        <p>
          A study performed in an o ce laboratory where participants had personal
dimming control over lighting, and were then exposed to a simulated load shed
involving dimming lighting by 2% per minute refers that only 20% of the
participants intervened in the lighting control when the luminance level declined 35%,
this shows that load shedding might be a valid option for energy costs reduction,
since users might tolerate a considerable light dimming [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
          ].
7.2
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-7-2">
        <title>Set-point relaxation</title>
        <p>
          Set point relaxation is a term that describes the technique of increasing or
decreasing a determined set point to save energy. For example if a HVAC system
is adjusted to 22 degrees the set point "relaxation" can be between 21 and 23
which varies according to the season, in the winter the set point can be adjusted
to 21 degrees and in the summer it can be adjusted to 23. This "relaxation"
will be hardly perceivable by the user if done gradually and if the variation
between set-points does not exceed more than 2 or 3 degrees. This minor change
in the set-point when applied to an entire building can help reducing energy
consumption while keeping users comfort [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
          ]. This technique can also be applied
to lighting systems: if a user sets the lights intensity level to 80%, the
relaxation can be 10% establishing the intensity level at 70% without any noticeable
di erence.
7.3
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-7-3">
        <title>Set-point constraining</title>
        <p>Maximum level of service set-point constraining basically limits users from
setting a level of service above a prede ned maximum. Suppose, for example that
during the daylight it can pre-de ned that no lamp in the corridors can be set
to more that 80% and if the user tries to exceed that limit the system will
gradually reduces the level of service to the speci ed level. In some situations, this
technique may have a marginal impact in users comfort, which in face of the
energy savings obtained can be tolerable.
7.4</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-7-4">
        <title>Demand Limiting</title>
        <p>
          Demand Limiting consists of reducing power loads during periods where power
prices are at a premium cost. Demand limiting is di erent from load shedding
because it reduces the current amount of power versus turning equipment o
used on load shedding. For example, demand limiting would be dimming lights
for a certain period of time where prices are high or decreasing cooling set points
in non-critical areas during peak demand periods. Demand limiting will reduce
energy bills as load shedding does but at the same time it will keep consumers
comfort level higher [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
          ].
7.5
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-7-5">
        <title>Ubiquitous control</title>
        <p>A more adequate interface allows the occupant to achieve a better control over
the surrounding environment. Creating more frequent and more precise adjusted
conditions for the task being performed. Consider the case of an occupant that
does not leave the seat to turn o a lamp that is no longer needed. Therefore,
the ubiquitiousness of control also leads to energy savings.</p>
        <p>
          When energy-e cient control techniques are applied in buildings peoples
comfort may be compromised and eventually consumers will stop using
energye cient control techniques in favour to their personal comfort. Often people use
more light intensity than what they actually need. The occupant is less likely
to over illuminate if enabled to personalize their own ambiance, selecting their
ideal light level for working. It has been demonstrated by a number of studies
that personal dimming also results in higher productivity [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
          ].
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>A taxonomy of energy-e cient control techniques implemented by SB is
presented in Figure 1. The taxonomy is organized into a tree hierarchy. The topmost
nodes aggregate energy-e cient techniques based on their main characteristics.
Individualized control refers to techniques that are capable of circumscribing
control with varying granularity. The Automatic control node has two sub-nodes,
the activity based sub-node where energy-e cient control techniques base their
actuation on space occupation and Environmental Harvesting that tries to use
the environmental condition to achieve energy consumption reductions. Load
Control techniques try to manage energy loads in order to achieve energy cost
reductions. Finally, User Buy-in gathers techniques that take advantage based
on occupant characteristics in order to achieve an energy consumption reduction.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>Conclusions and future work</title>
      <p>Although a plethora of techniques have been proposed over the years which, if
combined, could result in a relevant energy savings, to the best of our
knowledge existing systems apply these techniques in isolation. Herein we review and
categorize existing control techniques aiming at an abstract model upon which
new control can be based.</p>
      <p>From literature review we organize the main energy-e cient control
techniques into the appropriate taxonomy based on their techniques based on their
main characteristics. While doing the literature survey we also identi ed the
expected gains for all the main control techniques.</p>
      <p>As future work we intend to model energy-e cient control operations. We
believe that such model will be useful as (i) an abstraction enabling to separate
techniques from speci c implementations and (ii) understand how to compose
the di erent operations. Another possibility is for di erent techniques to be
modeled according to their energy requirements and the quality of service they
deliver. Therefore, the modeling that we envision could also be used to select the
most appropriate technique under certain energy constraints. This can be used
to implement automated demand-response.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1. Advanced Lighting controls, chapter
          <volume>12</volume>
          . The Fairmont Press, Inc,
          <year>2006</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Cziker</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Chindris</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>and</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Miron</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Implementation of fuzzy logic in daylighting control</article-title>
          .
          <source>INES 2007 - 11th International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems</source>
          ,
          <year>2007</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Ehrlich</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Papamichaeland</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Lai</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Revzan</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>A method for simulating performance of photosensor-based lighting controls</article-title>
          .
          <source>Elsevier Science</source>
          ,
          <year>2002</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Floyd</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Parker</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Field commissioning of a daylight-dimming lighting system</article-title>
          .
          <source>Florida Solar Energy Center</source>
          ,
          <year>1995</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Kiliccote</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Piette</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Advanced control technologies and strategies linking demand strategies and energy e ciency</article-title>
          .
          <source>International Conference for Enhanced Building Operations</source>
          ,
          <year>2005</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Laha</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Zupanc</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>and</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Krainera</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Fuzzy control for the illumination and temperature comfort in a test chamber</article-title>
          .
          <source>The International Journal of Building Science and its Applications</source>
          ,
          <year>2004</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Leslie</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Capturing the daylight dividend in buildings: Why and how? elsevier Science</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ltd</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2002</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Newsham</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Mancini</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>The potential for demand-responsive lighting in non-daylit o ces</article-title>
          .
          <source>NRC Institute</source>
          for Research in Construction,
          <year>2006</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Roisin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Bodart</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Deneyer</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Daerdt</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Lighting energy savings in o ces using di erent control systems and their real consumption</article-title>
          .
          <source>elsevier Science Ltd</source>
          ,
          <year>2007</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Tabriz</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Fard</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Partovi</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Review of architectural daylighting analysis of photovoltaic panels of bipv with zero energy emission approach</article-title>
          . Technical and Physical Problems of Engineering, March,
          <year>2011</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Verderber</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Jewell</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Morse</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Building design: Impact on the lighting control system for a day lighting strategy</article-title>
          . Applied Science Division Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory University of California Berkeley,
          <year>2001</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>