=Paper= {{Paper |id=None |storemode=property |title=None |pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-926/preface.pdf |volume=Vol-926 }} ==None== https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-926/preface.pdf
                                   Preface


The AI*IA Doctoral Consortium (DC) was held as part of the 12th Symposium
of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AI*IA). It took place at
University of Rome “La Sapienza” on June 15th, 2012. It follows the very positive
experience of the first edition of the DC in the 2010 AI*IA Symposium, according
to the spirit of the DCs within main international conferences (such as IJCAI
and AAAI).
    The Consortium was planned to give Ph.D. students conducting research in
the field of Artificial Intelligence an opportunity to interact with established re-
searchers and with other students. Although the DC was designed primarily for
students currently enrolled in a Ph.D. program, the call for proposals was also
open to exceptions (e.g., students currently in a Master’s program and interested
in doctoral studies). Students at any stage in their doctoral studies were encour-
aged to apply, since contributions describing both mature and preliminary work
were welcomed.
    Eleven contributions were received, of which 9 were accepted for presentation.
The Consortium consisted in a poster session in the courtyard of the conference
venue. Attendance was open to all AI*IA Symposium participants.
    We are pleased with the quality of the contributed research summaries and
posters. Submitted works covered a broad spectrum of topics within AI, includ-
ing machine learning, scheduling and optimization, knowledge representation
and reasoning, natural language processing. Most contributions highlighted the
practical applications of the investigated AI techniques in cutting-edge fields
such as embedded systems design, ubiquitous computing and ambient intelli-
gence, question answering, business process management. All students were able
to describe their work in a clear and interesting way, as well as to sustain dis-
cussion with competence and maturity.
    We are particularly grateful to mentors who took part at the DC. We received
very positive responses to our invitations to read the students’ proposals and
discuss them at the venue. Discussions were very open and mentors provided
valuable suggestions and ideas to the students, displaying genuine interest for
their work.
    In conclusion, we are confident that the DC was a good experience for all par-
ticipants, promoting mutual exchange of ideas and possibly even future research
collaborations.




July 2012                 Paolo Liberatore, Michele Lombardi, Floriano Scioscia
                                                                 DC Co-chairs