ORGANISATIONAL IMPLICATIONS CAUSED BY THE FOURTH GENERATION ENVIRONMENT Simon Holloway Principal Consultant DCE I nformation Management Consultancy Vice Chairman, RCS Data Management Specialist Group Copyright S.R. Holloway 1. INTRODUCTION Every person involved in the system development life-cycle will be affected by the increasing level of automation and support. Some traditional data processing roles will be radically altercd, while some will become obsolete. With the adoption of automated ( methods, the concentration of human effort will be in the planning, analysis and design stages. New skills will need to be acquired by the programmers of today if they arc to adapt to the changing environment. Allhough the development of an organisation's major data and processing architectures Illay still involve large teams, much of the subsequellt application systcms developmclll will be achieved by small teams or by individuals. At the time of the first Unicom Seminar on thc subject of fourth Generation Tools, two of the UK's leading independent consultgants had seperatcly looked at what were the possible areas of impact of Fourth Generation Tools on an Organisation. David Gradwell [I] felt that there were three major areas of impact on organisational requirements due to new application development tools, be they 4th generation systems or Design Aids or whatever. The organisational stllrcture would need to evolve to meet these new needs. He stated that the three were as follows:- The distinction between prograllllllers and analysts will weaken and then disappear. The importance of strategic analysis is increased. Data administration will become essentirtl. Cross project planning ;1I1c1 cross user department planning will become essential. End users will need support in rheir use of decision support software. This will further emphasise the need for a data administration funclion. Roger Tagg [21 believed that there were thrce areas of change needed for an organisation to successfully usc Fourth Generation systems:- The demarcation lines between programmcrs and analysts become less valid. The position of" c!,lta processing within the organisation will change, with the IlCCCSS;II)' change in the sort of person who is manager of the area - Illorc a business manager. The involvement or end users in ;\c(lIally developing solutions to their own problems. As C:Ill be seen, they agreed Oil nnly two ;ISpcctS. namely Ille distinction between programlllers alld ;1Il1ysts, and the involvl'mcilt (If Cl1d~llscrs. Since thi;ll time, the Illslilule of Data Processing Man:lgcmenl ",,\'C issucd a rcport I:II, which ":IS suggcsted Ih"t Or9~nis<)tjonallmp!icalions C~us()d hy tile 'Ith Generation Fnviroflfllcnl P