=Paper=
{{Paper
|id=None
|storemode=property
|title=Opinion and Factivity Analysis of Italian Political Discourse
|pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-964/paper14.pdf
|volume=Vol-964
|dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/iir/DelmonteTG13
}}
==Opinion and Factivity Analysis of Italian Political Discourse==
https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-964/paper14.pdf
Opinion and Factivity Analysis of Italian political
discourse
Rodolfo Delmonte1, Daniela Gîfu2, Rocco Tripodi1
1
Ca’Foscari University, Department Language Science,
Ca’ Bembo, dd. 1075, 30123, Venice
delmont@unive.it, rocco.trip@gmail.com
2
„Alexandru Ioan Cuza“ University, Faculty of Computer Science,
16, General Berthelot St., 700483, Iaşi
daniela.gifu@info.uaic.ro
Abstract. The success of a newspaper article for the public opinion can be
measured by the degree in which the journalist is able to report and modify (if
needed) attitudes, opinions, feelings and political beliefs. We present a
symbolic system for Italian, derived from GETARUNS, which integrates a
range of natural language processing tools with the intent to characterise the
print press discourse from a semantic and pragmatic point of view. This has
been done on some 500K words of text, extracted from three Italian newspapers
in order to characterize their stance on a deep political crisis situation. We tried
two different approaches: a lexicon-based approach for semantic polarity using
off-the-shelf dictionaries with the addition of manually supervised domain
related concepts; another one is a feature-based semantic and pragmatic
approach, which computes propositional level analysis with the intent to better
characterize important component like factuality and subjectivity. Results are
quite revealing and confirm the otherwise common knowledge about the
political stance of each newspaper on such topic as the change of government
that took place at the end of last year, 2011.
Keywords: journalist opinion, sentiment analysis, political discourse,
lexical-semantic, syntax, print press, Government of Italy.
1 Introduction
In this paper, we discuss paradigms for evaluating linguistic interpretation of
discourses as applied by a light scaled version the system for text understanding
called GETARUNS. We focus on three aspects critical to a successful evaluation:
creation of large quantities of reasonably good training data, lexical-semantic and
syntactic analysis. Measuring the polarity of a text is usually done by text
categorization methods which rely on freely available resources. However, we assume
that in order to properly capture opinion and sentiment [6,10,11,17] expressed in a
text or dialog, any system needs a linguistic text processing approach that aims at
producing semantically viable representation at propositional level. In particular, the
idea that the task may be solved by the use of Information Retrieval tools like Bag of
Words Approaches (BOWs) is insufficient. BOWs approaches are sometimes also
camouflaged by a keyword based Ontology matching and Concept search [10], based
on SentiWordNet (Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining with WordNet) [2]– more on this
resource below -, by simply stemming a text and using content words to match its
entries and produce some result [16]. Any search based on keywords and BOWs is
fatally flawed by the impossibility to cope with such fundamental issues as the
following ones, which Polanyi and Zaenen [12] named contextual valence shifters:
- presence of negation at different levels of syntactic constituency;
- presence of lexicalized negation in the verb or in adverbs;
- presence of conditional, counterfactual subordinators;
- double negations with copulative verbs;
- presence of modals and other modality operators.
It is important to remember that both PMI and LSA analysis [16] systematically
omit function or stop words from their classification set of words and only consider
content words. In order to cope with these linguistic elements we propose to build a
propositional level analysis directly from a syntactic constituency or chunk-based
representation. We implemented these additions on our system called GETARUNS
(General Text And Reference Understanding System) which has been used for
semantic evaluation purposes in the challenge called RTE and other semantically
heavy tasks [1,4]. The output of the system is an xml representation where each
sentence of a text or dialog is a list of attribute-value pairs. In order to produce this
output, the system makes use of a flat syntactic structure and a vector of semantic
attributes associated to the verb compound at propositional level and memorized.
Important notions required by the computation of opinion and sentiment are also the
distinction of the semantic content of each proposition into two separate categories:
objective vs. subjective.
This distinction is obtained by searching for factivity markers again at
propositional level [14]. In particular we take into account: modality operators like
intensifiers and diminishes, modal verbs, modifiers and attributes adjuncts at sentence
level, lexical type of the verb (from ItalWordNet classification, and our own),
subject’s person (if 3rd or not), and so on.
As will become clear below, we are using a lexicon-based [9,15] rather than a
classifier-based approach, i.e. we make a fully supervised analysis where semantic
features are associated to lemma and concept of the domain by creating a lexicon out
of frequency lists. In this way the semantically labelled lexicon is produced in an
empirical manner and fits perfectly the classification needs.
The paper is structured as follows. Section 2 comments on the role of print press
discourse; Section 3 describes the system for multi-dimensional political discourse
analysis. Section 4 presents comparative analysis of print press discourses collected
during the Berlusconi’s resignation in favour of Monti’s nominating the President of
Italian Government (October 12 – December 12, 2011). Finally, section 5 highlights
interpretations anchored in our analysis and presents a conclusion.
2 Print press discourse
Mirror of contemporary society, located in permanent socio-cultural revaluation, the
texts of print press can disrupt or use a momentary political power. In contemporary
society, the struggles stake is no longer the social use of technology, but it is the huge
production and dissemination of representations, informations and languages.
At present, the legitimacy of competence and credibility or reputation of political
authority is increasingly in competition with mediatic credibility and the charisma
already confirmed in public space. In political life we see how „heavy” actors are
imposed, benefiting preferential treatment in their publicity and/or how insignificant
actors, with reduced visibility, are ignored, even marginalized, notwithstanding their
possibly higher reputation. Most of the times, launching the new actors is
accompanied by changing others, intermediate body, the militants, condemned not
only to mediatic silence, but simply silenced: in this way, the role of opinion leaders
is drastically reduced.
Print press, in its various forms, assigns political significance to institutional
activities and events in their succession; it forms the political life of a nation, from
objective information to become the subject of public debate. In this case, the role of
print press is double:
1. secure information as a credible discourse to end a rumor;
2. enter politics in language forms, so they become consistently interpretable in a
symbolic system of representations.
The press is designed to legitimize the actions of politicians, attending their
visibility efforts, confirming or increasing their reputation. Print press includes
essentially political discourses, containing both a specific orientation and a political
commitment. The reader has the possibility to choose what and when to read, leaving
time to reflection, too. Disproportionality is a risk to the reality described.
No wonder why the people in power, if they intend to govern in peace, try to curb
the enthusiasm of the media. Most of the times, through excellence in the elections,
the print press is focused on topical issues, leading topics of public interest and events
of internal and external social life. However, the perception of social reality depends
on how it is presented. So the newspaper, like any commercial product, is dependent
on aesthetic presentations that may distort any event-selection alternative to news
items which are sensational and, often, negative (i.e. our comparative study).
3 The System GETARUNS
In this section we will present a detailed description of the symbolic system for Italian
that we used in this experiment. The system is derived from GETARUNS, a
multilingual system for deep text understanding with limited domain dependent
vocabulary and semantics, that works for English, German and Italian and has been
documented in the past 20 years or so with lots of publications and conference
presentations[3,5]. The deep version of the system has been scaled down in the last
ten years to a version that can be used with unlimited text and vocabulary, again for
English and Italian. The two versions can work in sequence in order to prevent
failures of the deep version. Or they work separately to produce less constrained
interpretations of the text at hand.
The "shallow" scaled version of GETARUNS has been adapted for the Opinion
and Sentiment analysis and results have already been published for English [6]. Now,
the current version which is aimed at Italian has been made possible by the creation of
the needed semantic resources, in particular a version of SentiWordNed adapted to
Italian and heavily corrected and modified. This version (see 3.0) uses weights for the
English WordNet and the mapping of sentiment weights has been done automatically
starting from the linguistic content of WordNet glosses. However, this process has
introduced a lot of noise in the final results, with many entries totally wrong. In
addition, there was a need to characterize uniquely only those entries that have a
"generic" or "commonplace" positive, or negative meaning associated to them. This
was deemed the only possible solution to the problem of semantic ambiguity, which
could only be solved by introducing a phase of Word Sense Disambiguation which
was not part of the system. So, we decided to erase all entries that had multiple
concepts associated to the same lemma, and had conflicting sentiment values. We also
created and added an ad hoc lexicon for the majority of concepts (some 3000)
contained in the text we analysed, in order to reduce the problem of ambiguity. This
was done again with the same approach, i.e. labelling only those concepts which were
uniquely intended as one or the other sentiment, restricting reference to the domain of
political discourse.
The system has been lately documented by our participation in the EVALITA
(Evaluation of NLP and Speech Tools for Italian) challenge1. It works in a usual NLP
pipeline: the system tokenizes the raw text and then searches for Multiwords. The
creation of multiwords is paramount to understanding specific domain related
meanings associated to sequences of words. This computation is then extended to
NER (Named Entity Recognition), which is performed on the basis of a big database
of entities, lately released by JRC (Joint Research Centre) research centre.2 Of course
we also use our own list of entities and multiwords.
Words that are not recognized by simple matching procedures in the big wordform
dictionary (500K entries), are then passed to the morphological analyser. In case also
this may fail, the guesser is activated, which will at first strip the word of its affixes. It
will start by stripping possible prefixes and then analysing the remaining portion; then
it will continue by stripping possible suffixes. If none of these succeeds, the word will
be labelled as foreign word if the final character is not a vowel; a noun otherwise. We
then perform tagging and chunking. In order to proceed to the semantic level, each
nominal expression is classified at first on the basis of the assigned tag: proper nouns
are used in the NER task. The remaining nominal expressions are classified using the
classes derived from ItalWordNet (Italian WordNet)3. In addition to that, we have
compiled specialized terminology databases for a number of common domains
including: medical, political, economic, and military. These lexica are used to add a
specific class label to the general ones derived from ItalWordNet. And in case the
word or multiword is not present there, to uniquely classify them. The output of this
1
http://www.evalita.it/
2
http://irmm.jrc.ec.europa.eu/
3
http://www.ilc.cnr.it/iwndb/iwndb_php/
semantic classification phase is a vector of features associated to the word and lemma,
together with the sentence index and sentence position. These latter indices will then
be used to understand semantic relations intervening in the sentence between the main
governing verb and the word under analysis. Semantic mapping is then produced by
using the output of the shallow parsing and the functional mapping algorithm which
produce a simplified labelling of the chunks into constituent structure. These
structures are produced in a bottom-up manner and subcategorization information is
only used to choose between the assignments of functional labels for argumenthood.
In particular, choosing between argument labels like SUBJ, OBJ2, OBL which are
used for core arguments, and ADJ which is used for all adjuncts requires some
additional information related to the type of governing verb.
The first element for Functional Mapping is the Verbal Complex, which contains
all the sequence of linguistic items that may contribute to its semantic interpretation,
including all auxiliaries, modals, adverbials, negation, clitics. We then distinguish
passive from active diathesis and we use the remaining information available in the
feature vector to produce a full-fledged semantic classification at propositional level.
The semantic mapping includes, beside diathesis:
- Change in the World; Subjectivity and Point of View; Speech Act; Factitiviy;
Polarity.
4 A comparative study
Whereas the aims of syntax and semantics in this system are relatively clear, the tasks
of pragmatics are still hard to extract automatically. But, we have to recognize the
huge relevance of pragmatics in analyzing political texts.
4.1 The corpus
For the elaboration of preliminary conclusions on the process of the change of the
Italian government and president of government, we collected, stored and processed -
partially manually, partially automatically -, relevant texts published by three national
on-line newspapers having similar profiles4.
For analytical results to be comparable to those taken so far by second author
[20,21], we needed a big corpus, especially considering five rigorous criteria that we
list below:
1. Type of message
Selection of newspapers was made taking into account the type of opinions
circulated by the Editorial: pro, against Berlusconi and impartial. The following
newspapers were thus selected:
a) Corriere della Sera - www.corriere.it (called The People Newspaper).
b) Libero - www.liberoquotidiano.it (pro Berlusconi).
c) La Republica – www.repubblica.it (against Berlusconi).
2. Period of time
4
www.corriere.it, www.liberoquotidiano.it, www.repubblica.it
The interval time chosen should be large enough to capture the lexical-semantic
and syntactic richness found in the Italian press. It was divided into three time
periods. We specify them here below with their abbreviations, used during analysis.
A month before the resignation of Berlusconi (12 November 2011), abbreviated to
OMBB: October 12 to November 11, 2011
The period between the presentation of Berlusconi's resignation and the
appointment of Mario Monti as premier of the Italian Government, abbreviated with
PTMB: 12 to 16 November 2011
A month after the resignation of Berlusconi, abbreviated with OMAB: November
17 to December 12, 2011.
Two keywords were commonly used to select items from the Italian press, that is
the name of the two protagonists: (Silvio) Berlusconi (and appellations found in
newspaper articles: Silvio, Il Cavaliere, Il Caimano) and (Mario) Monti.
We tried to select an archive rich enough for each of the three newspapers
(meaning dozens of articles per day), the selected period of time as the one of interest,
between average values. Text selection was made taking into account the subcriterion
Ordina per rilevanza (order articles by relevance) that each web page of the
corresponding newspapers made available. We then introduced a new subcriterion of
selection: storing articles in the first three positions of each web page for every day of
the research period. In particular we collected on average 250 articles per newspaper,
that is 750 articles overall. Also number of tokens are on average 150K tokens per
newspaper, i.e. 450K tokens overall. Computation time on a tower MacPro equipped
with 6 Gb RAM and 1 Xeon quad-core was approximately 2 hours.
4.2 The syntactic and semantic analysis
In Fig. 1 below, we present comparative semantic polarity and subjectivity analyses
of the texts extracted from the three Italian newspapers. On the graph we show
differences in values for four linguistic variables: they are measured as percent value
over the total number of semantic linguistic variables selected from the overall
analysis and distributed over three time periods on X axis. To display the data we use
a simple difference formula, where Difference value is subtracted from the average of
the values of the other two newpapers for that class. Differences may appear over or
below the 0 line. In particular, values above the 0x axis mean they assume positive or
higher than values below the 0x axis, which have a negative import. The classes
chosen are respectively: 1. propositional level polarity with NEGATIVE value; 2.
factivity or factuality computed at propositional level, which contains values for non
factual descriptions; 3. subjectivity again computed at propositional level; 4. passive
diathesis. We can now evaluate different attitudes and styles of the three newspapers
with respect to the three historical periods: in particular we can now appreciate
whether the articles report facts objectively without the use of additional comments
documenting the opinion of the journalist. Or if it is rather the case that the subjective
opinion of the journalist is present only in certain time spans and not in others.
Fig. 1. Comparative semantic polarity analysis of three Italian newspapers.
So for instance, Corriere, the blue or darker line, has higher nonfactive values in
two time spans, OMBB and PTMB; Repubblica values soar in OMAB. In the same
period Libero has the lowest values; whereas in OMBB, Libero and Corriere have the
highest values when compared with Repubblica. PTMB clearly shows up as a real
intermediate period of turmoil which introduces a change: here Repubblica becomes
more factual whereas Libero does the opposite. Subjectivity is distributed very much
in the same way as factuality, in the three time periods even though with lesser
intensity. Libero is the most factual newspaper, with the least number of subjective
clauses. Similar conclusion can be drawn from the use of passive clauses, where we
see again that Libero has the lowest number. The reasons for Libero having the lowest
number of nonfactive clauses in OMAB, needs to be connected with the highest
number of NEGATIVE polarity clauses, which is related to the nomination of Monti
instead of Berlusconi, and is felt and is communicated to its readers as less reliable,
trustable, trustworthy. Uncertainty is clearly shown in the intermediate period, PTMB,
where Corriere has again the highest number of nonfactual clauses.
4.3 The pragmatic analysis
We show in this section the results outputted by GETARUNS when analysing the
streams of textual data belonging to the three sections of the corpus (presented in
section 4.1). In Fig. 2 we represent comparative differences between the three
newspaper in the use of three linguistic variables for each time period. In particular,
we plotted the following classes of pragmatic linguistic objects: 1. references to
Berlusconi as entity (Silvio, Silvio_Berlusconi, Berlusconi, Cavaliere, Caimano); 2.
references to Monti as entity (Monti, prof_Monti, professore, Mario_Monti,
super_Mario); 3. negative words or overall negative content words. To capture
coreference mentions to the same entity we built a specialized coreference algorithm.
One month before Berlusconi’s resignation (OMBB), we can highlight the
opinions of the three dailies as follows: Corriere della Sera and Libero are concerned
mostly with Berlusconi (see Berlusconi occurrences), with a remarkable difference
however in terms of positive – Libero - vs negative – Corriere – comments. After
Berlusconi resigned (OMAB) Libero is more concerned than the other two
newspapers on Monti: negative appreciation is always higher with Libero and not
with the other two. This can clearly be seen from the sudden dip of positive words.
Finally in the intermediate period, both Libero and Corriere seem to be the most
concerned with the new government, with the highest number of negative comments.
Fig. 2. Comparative pragmatic analysis of three Italian newspapers.
As shown in Fig.2, measuring the overall attitude with positive vs. negative
affective content for each newspaper allows a clear cut subdivision in the three time
periods. Table 1 below shows the same data in a more perspicuous manner. The
percentages from Table 1 are organized as follows. Positive values are computed
along time line distribution: for each newspaper, we compute the percentage referred
to the each time slot. For instance, in OMBB positive values are distributed with the
following subdivision in percent values: 33.88 for Corriere, 33.75 for Libero, and
32.37 for Repubblica. In other words, in OMBB, Corriere uses the most number of
positive words. In fact, as can be easily noticed, Corriere is the newspaper that uses
most positive keywords in all the three time periods. On the contrary, Libero is the
newspaper that uses the least number of positive keywords apart from OMBB.
Repubblica lies in the middle. The second number included in the same cell is needed
to account for differences in number of tokens, and this in turn is due to differences in
number of days considered for each time period: 31 for OMBB, 5 for PTBM and 26
for OMAB. Average values for each time period for each newspaper in part confirm
percent values but also give a deepest idea of the actual numbers at play.
Newspaper / Corriere della Sera Libero La Republica
time period
positive negative positive negative positive negative
33.95% 35.49% 33.74% 32.6% 32.34% 31.91%
OMBB 52.1 21.48 51.9 19.77 49.77 18.58
42.36% 44.49% 24.4% 25.98% 33.24% 29.53%
PTMB 61.2 21.8 34.2 11.4 45.8 16
35.14% 32.68% 25.39% 28.21% 39.47% 39.12%
OMAB 54.88 20.42 39.58 18 49.12 19.53
Table 1. Sentiment analysis of three Italian newspapers
Negative opinions are computed in the same way. These data can be interpreted as
follow:
One month before Berlusconi’s resignation (OMBB), both Libero and Corriere
della Sera have more positive contents than La Repubblica, which can be interpreted
as follows: Berlusconi’s Government is considered a good one; in addition, Libero,
has the lowest percentage of negative opinions about the current economic situation.
In the intermediate period between Berlusconi's resignation and nomination of the
new Prime Minister, Mario Monti (PTMB) we see that Corriere has by far the highest
percentage of positive opinions, whereas Libero has the lowest. The other period, one
month after the nomination of new prime minister, Mario Monti, (OMAB), we assist
to a change of opinions. Corriere della Sera becomes more positive than other
newspapers and also negative opinions are much higher: the new prime minister
seems a good chance for the Italian situation; however, the economic situation is very
bad. Libero – the newspaper owned by Berlusconi - becomes a lot less positive and
less negative than the other two. This situation changes in the following time period,
where Libero increases in positivity – but remains always the lowest value – and in
negativity, but remains below the other two newspaper, on average. This can be
regarded as a distinctive stylistic feature of Libero newspaper. As a whole, we can see
that Repubblica is the one that undergoes less changes, if compared to Libero and
Corriere which are the ones that undergo most changes in affective attitude.
We already saw in the Fig. 1 above that Libero is the newspaper with the highest
number of nonfactual and subjective clauses in the OMAB time period: if we now add
this information to the one derived from the use of positive vs. negative words, we see
that the dramatic change in the political situation is no longer shown by the presence
of a strong affective vocabulary, but by the modality of presenting important concepts
related to the current political and economic situation, which becomes vague and less
factual after Berlusconi resigned.
Eventually, we were interested in identifying semantic linguistic common area
(identification of common words), also called common lexical fields, and their
affective import (positive or negative). From previous tables, it can be easily noticed
that all three newspapers use words with strong negative import, but with different
frequency. Of course, this may require some specification, seeing the political context
analyzed. So we decided to focus on a certain number of specialized concepts and
associated keywords that we extracted from the analysis to convey the overall attitude
and feeling of the political situation. We collected in Table 2 below all words related
to “Crisis Identification” (CIW for short) and noted down their absolute frequency of
occurrence for each time interval.
CIW CIW
Corriere Libero Repub. Corriere Libero Repub.
OMBB OMAB
1. crisis 124 71 94 1. crisis 50 21 110
sacrifice 4 14 4 sacrifice 9 23 16
rigour 5 4 4 rigour 23 18 10
austerity 0 6 6 austerity 6 2 0
2. battle 6 12 14 2. battle 14 4 8
dissent 2 8 8 dissent 0 4 0
dictator/ship 2 10 18 dictator/ship 2 6 2
3. fail/ure 8 13 9 3. fail/ure 21 8 15
collapse 10 6 12 collapse 8 2 4
drama/tic 12 14 18 drama/tic 4 0 8
dismiss/al 45 39 20 dismiss/al 3 2 15
Table 2. Crisis Identification words in two time periods
If we look at the list as being divided up into three main conceptualizations, we
may regard the first one as denouncing the critical situation, the second one as trying
to indicate some causes; and the last one as being related to the reaction to the crisis.
It is now evident what the bias of each newspaper is, in relation to the incoming crisis:
- Corriere della Sera feels the “crisis” a lot deeper before Berlusconi’s resignation,
than afterwards when Monti arrives; the same applies to Libero. La Repubblica feels
the opposite way. However, whereas “austerity” is never used by La Repubblica after
B.’s resignation and it was used before it, this is the opposite of what Corriere della
Sera does, the word appears only after B’s resignation, never before. As to the
companion word “sacrifice”, Libero is the one that uses it the most, and as expected
its appearance increases a lot after B.’s resignation, together with the companion word
“rigour” that has the same behaviour. This word confirms Corriere’s attitude towards
Monti’s nomination: it will bring “austerity, rigour and sacrifice”.
- in the second half, the other interesting couple of concepts is linked to “battle,
dissent, dictator”. In particular, “battle” is used in the opposite way by Corriere della
Sera when compared to the other two newspapers: the word appears more than the
double in the second period, giving the impression that the new government will have
to fight a lot more than the previous one. As to “dissent”, all three newspapers use it
in the same manner: it disappears in both Corriere della Sera and La Repubblica, and
it is halved in Libero. Eventually the “dictator/ship” usually related to B. or to B.’s
government: it is a critical concept for La Repubblica in the first period, and it almost
disappears in the second one.
- as to the third part of the list, whereas Libero felt the situation “dramatic” before
B.’s resignation, the dramaticity disappears afterwards. The same applies in smaller
percentage to the other two newspapers. Another companion word, “collapse” has the
same behaviour: Monti’s arrival is felt positively. However, the fear and the rumours
of “failure” is highly felt by Corriere della Sera and La Repubblica, less so by Libero.
This is confirmed by the abrupt disappearance of the concept of “dismiss/al” which
dips to the lowest with Libero.
5 Conclusion
The analysis we proposed in this paper aims at testing if a linguistic perspective
anchored in natural language processing techniques (in this case, the scaled version of
GETARUNS system) could be of some use in evaluating political discourse in print
press. If this proves to be feasible, then a linguistic approach would become a very
relevant to an applicative perspective, with important effects in the optimization of the
automatic analysis of political discourse.
However, we are aware that this study only sketches a way to go, and a lot more
should be studied until a reliable discourse interpreting technology will become a tool
in researcher’s hands. We should also be aware of the dangers of false interpretation.
For instance, if we take as example the three newspapers we used in our experiments,
differences at the level of lexicon and syntax, which we have highlighted as
differentiating them, should be attributed only partially to their idiosyncratic
rhetorical styles, because these differences could also have editorial roots.
Theoretically, at least, Corriere della Sera, should embody an impartial opinion,
Libero, pro Berlusconi and La Repubblica, against him. But differences are more
subtle, and in fact, in some cases, we could likewise classify Libero as being
impartial, Corriere della Sera as being pro current government and La Repubblica as
the only one being more critical on the current government disregarding its political
stance. It remains yet to be decided the impact that the use of certain syntactic
structures could have over a wider audience of political discourse. In other words, this
study may show that automatic linguistic processing is able to detect tendencies in the
manipulation of the interlocutor with the hidden role of detouring the attention of the
audience from the actual communicated content in favor of the speaker’s intentions.
Different intensities of emotional levels have been clearly highlighted, but we
intend to organize a much more fine-grained scale of emotional expressions. It is a
well-known fact that the audience can be easily manipulated (e.g., the social and
economic class) by a social actor (journalist, political actor) when their themes are
treated with excessive emotional tonalities (in our study, common negative words). In
the future, we intend to extend the specialized lexicon for political discourse in order
to individuate more specific uses of words in context, of those words which are
ambiguous between different semantic classes, or between classes in the lexicon and
outside the lexicon (in which case they would not have to be counted). We believe
that GETARUNS has a range of features that make it attractive as a tool to assist any
kind of communication campaign. We wish it to be rapidly adapted to new domains
and to new languages (i.e. Romanian), and be endowed with a user-friendly web
interface that offers a wide range of functionalities. The system helps to outline
distinctive features which bring a new and, sometimes, unexpected vision upon the
discursive feature of journalists’ writing.
Acknowledgments: In performing this research, the second author was supported by the
POSDRU/89/1.5/S/63663 grant.
References
1. Bos, Johan & Delmonte, Rodolfo (eds.): “Semantics in Text Processing (STEP), Research
in Computational Semantics”, Vol.1, College Publications, London (2008).
2. Esuli, A. and F. Sebastiani. Sentiwordnet: a publicly available lexical resource for opinion
mining. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation
LREC, 6, 2006.
3. Delmonte, R. (2007). Computational Linguistic Text Processing – Logical Form, Logical
Form, Semantic Interpretation, Discourse Relations and Question Answering, Nova Science
Publishers, New York.
4. Delmonte, R., Tonelli, S., Tripodi, R.: Semantic Processing for Text Entailment with
VENSES, published at http://www.nist.gov/tac/publications/2009/papers.html in TAC 2009
Proceedings Papers (2010).
5. Delmonte, R. (2009). Computational Linguistic Text Processing – Lexicon, Grammar,
Parsing and Anaphora Resolution, Nova Science Publishers, New York.
6. Delmonte R. and Vincenzo Pallotta, 2011. Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis Need
Text Understanding, in "Advances in Distributed Agent-based Retrieval Tools",
“Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing”, Springer, 81-96.
7. Gîfu, D. and Cristea, D.: Multi-dimensional analysis of political language, in J. J. (Jong
Hyuk) Park, V. Leung, T. Shon, Cho-Li Wang (eds.) In Proc. of 7th FTRA International
Conference on Future Information Technology, Application, and Service – FutureTech-
2012, Vancouver, vol. 1, Springer (2012).
8. Hobbs, J. R., Stickel, M., Appelt, D., and Martin, P.: “Interpretation as Abduction”, SRI
International Artificial Intelligence Centre Technical Note 499 (1990).
9. Pennebaker, James W., Booth, Roger J., Francis, Martha E.: “Linguistic Inquiry and Word
Count” (LIWC), at http://www.liwc.net/.
10. Kim, S.-M. and E. Hovy. Determining the sentiment of opinions. In Proceedings of the 20th
international conference on computational linguistics (COLING 2004), page 1367–1373,
August 2004.
11. Pang, B. and L. Lee. A sentimental education: sentiment analysis using subjectivity
summarization based on minimum cuts. In Proceedings of the 42nd annual meeting of the
Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), page 271–278, 2004.
12. Polanyi, Livia and Zaenen, Annie: “Contextual valence shifters”. In Janyce Wiebe, editor,
Computing Attitude and Affect in Text: Theory and Applications. Springer, Dordrecht, 1–
10 (2006).
13. Pollack, M., Pereira, F.: “Incremental interpretation”. In Artificial Intelligence 50, 37-82
(1991).
14. Saurì R., Pustejovsky, J.: “Are You Sure That This Happened? Assessing the Factuality
Degree of Events in Text”, Computational Linguistics, 38, 2, 261-299 (2012).
15. Taboada, M., Brooke, J., Tofiloski, M., Voll, K. & Stede, M.: “Lexicon-based methods for
sentiment analysis”. In Computational Linguistics 37(2): 267-307 (2011).
16. Turney, P.D. and M.L. Littman. Measuring praise and criticism: Inference of semantic
orientation from association. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), pages
15–346, 2003.
17. Wiebe, Janyce, Wilson, Theresa, Cardie, Claire: “Annotating expressions of opinions and
emotions in language”. In Language Resources and Evaluation, 39(2):165–210 (2005).