<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta />
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>c 2012 by the paper authors. CLA 2012, pp. 317–325. Copying permitted only for
private and academic purposes. Volume published and copyrighted by its editors.</p>
      <p>Local Proceedings in ISBN 978–84–695–5252–0,</p>
      <p>Universidad de M´alaga (Dept. Matem´atica Aplicada), Spain.</p>
      <p>This paper is motivated by understanding links between several parameters
theory.
that are onsidered in dierent areas su h as FCA, database, logi and graph</p>
      <p>318 Laurent Beaudou, Mamadou Moustapha Kant´e and Lhouari Nourine
Demetrovi s et al. [5℄ gave a hara terization of onvex sets of an impli ation
basis. Proposition 1 is restri ted to betweenness relations.</p>
      <p>The lattice of all betweenness relations: Structure and properties 319
under in lusion.</p>
      <p>Theorem 1. is a losure system and therefore a latti e when stru tured FX
shortest path betweenness
(b) Convex sets of for G
Proof. We prove this proposition point by point.</p>
      <p>The lattice of all betweenness relations: Structure and properties 321
F1 ∧ F2 = FΣ1∪Σ2.</p>
      <p>F1 ∨ F2 = FΣ1∩Σ2.</p>
      <p>Thus, the o-atom asso iated to the impli ation is not [{a, b}, X \ {c}]. ab → c
above but it is above , so that has at least two su F ′ F F
that all meet-irredu ible elements are o-atoms of . FX
tion 1, we know that from to , we remove at least an interval of the form F ′ F
only su essor of and a betweenness su h that is . By Proposi- FΣ1 Σ2 F ′ FΣ2
322 Laurent Beaudou, Mamadou Moustapha Kant´e and Lhouari Nourine
{1, 2} {1, 3} {1, 4} {2, 3} {2, 4} {3, 4} {1, 2, 3} {1, 2, 4} {1, 3, 4} {2, 3, 4}</p>
      <p>The lattice of all betweenness relations: Structure and properties 323</p>
      <p>324 Laurent Beaudou, Mamadou Moustapha Kant´e and Lhouari Nourine
ases of betweenness relations (see for instan e [7℄ for the shortest path
betweendatabase theory, and they have been proved NP- omplete [5,14,15℄ for general
These problems have been studied in the several domains and spe ially in
Therefore, we have the following.
ness relation on graphs). It is known as the hull number of a betweenness relation.
impli ation bases. The problem MK has been proved NP- omplete for parti ular
of ould help to address this question. FX
tational omplexity of the hydra number is open for betweenness relations, but
The size of an optimal over is known as the hydra number [19℄. The
ompuis NP- omplete for the general ase [11,15℄. We hope that the latti e stru ture</p>
      <p>Question: Is there a set su h that and K ⊆ X |K| ≤ k KΣ = X?
Input: a betweenness relation on and an integer. Σ X k
Minimum Key (MK)
polynomial time algorithms for the MK problem in new graph lasses?
by using database te hniques. Can we use the latti e stru ture of to get new FX
Re ently, KantØ and Nourine [12℄ have shown that is polynomial for M K
shortest path betweenness relations of hordal and distan e hereditary graphs
horn knowledge bases: Complexity and approximation. Artif. Intell., 64(1):131
7. Mitre Costa Dourado, John G. Gimbel, Jan Krato hvl, FÆbio Protti, and
100:75163, 1928. 10.1007/BF01448840.</p>
      <p>
        University Press, 2002.
4. G. de Beauregard Robinson. The foundations of geometry. Mathemati al
exposiin relational databases: A latti e point of view. Dis rete Applied Mathemati s,
40(2):155185, 1992.
al report, Universitat PolitŁ ni a de Catalunya,
http://www5. JÆnos Demetrovi s, Leonid Libkin, and Ilya B. Mu hnik. Fun tional dependen ies
Vygen, J. (eds.) Resear h Trends in Combinatorial Optimization, pages 5764,
11. Peter L. Hammer and Alexander Kogan. Optimal ompression of propositional
Springer (Berlin and New York), 1999.
10. B. Ganter and R. Wille. Formal on ept analysis: Mathemati al foundations.
674, 1980.
17. Igna io M. Pelayo. On onvexity graphs. Te
hnimati s, 38:471485, 1971.
145, 1993.
tions. University of Toronto Press, 1952.
3. B. A. Davey and A. Priestley. Introdu tion to Latti es and Order. Cambridge
SIAM Journal on Algebrai and Dis rete Methods, 7:433444, 1986.
2. Va†ek ChvÆtal. Antimatroids, betweenness, onvexity. In Cook, W.J., LovÆz, L.,
ma3.up .es/users/pelayo/resear h/Denitions.pdf, 2004.
tween the CarathØodory, Helly, and Radon numbers. Pa i Journal of
MatheJayme Luiz Szwar ter. On the omputation of the hull number of a graph.
Disof Computer and System S ien es, 17(2):270 279, 1978.
16. Karl Menger. Untersu hungen ber allgemeine metrik. Mathematis he Annalen,
hypergraphs: A preliminary report. In ISAIM, 2012.
19. Despina Stasi, Robert H. Sloan, and Gyrgy TurÆn. Hydra formulas and dire ted
hull set in distan e-hereditary and hordal graphs. Submitted, 2012.
2019.
9. Martin Farber and Robert E. Jamison. Convexity in graphs and hypergraphs.
editor, Geometriae Dedi ata, vol 19, Ni3, pages 247270. springer, 1985.
12. M.M. KantØ and L. Nourine. Polynomial time algorithms for omputing a minimum
15. David Maier. Minimum overs in relational database model. J. ACM, 27(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">4</xref>
        ):664
rete Mathemati s, 309(18):56685674, 2009.
8. P.H. Edelman and R.E. Jamison. The theory of onvex geometries. In R. Rustin,
Reprint Series. University of California Press, 1956.
18. H. Rei henba h and M. Rei henba h. The Dire tion of Time. California Library
14. Claudio L. Lu hesi and Sylvia L. Osborn. Candidate keys for relations. Journal
6. Reinhardt Diestel. Graph Theory. Springer-Verlag, edition, 2005. 3rd
1. Xiaomin Chen and Va†ek ChvÆtal. Problems related to a de Bruijn-Erdfis theorem.
13. D.C. Kay and E.W. Womble. Axiomati onvexity theory and relationships
beDis rete Applied Mathemati s, 156(11):21012108, 2008.
      </p>
      <p>The lattice of all betweenness relations: Structure and properties 325</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>4 Clique Betweenness Relations</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>ΣG</surname>
          </string-name>
          := {ab → c | c ∈ X, ab ∈/ E(G)}.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>