<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>A faceted search system for facilitating discovery-driven scienti c activities: a use case from functional ecology</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Marie-Angelique Laporte</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Eric Garnier</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Isabelle Mougenot</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (UMR 5175)</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>1919 Route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier Cedex 5</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="FR">France</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>UMR 228 ESPACE-DEV</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Maison de la Teledetection 34093 Montpellier</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="FR">France</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>To address biodiversity issues in ecology and assess the consequences of ecosystem changes, large quantities of long-term observational data from multiple data sets need to be integrated and characterized in a uni ed way. During these last decades, functional trait-based approaches have shown great potential to facilitate the understanding and the prediction of ecosystem changes. To promote data exchange, portability and to drive higher communiction between systems, scienti c communities are required to acquire data standards. Semantic web (or web of data) provides a realistic solution for these exact requirements. Consequently semantic web allows for creative approaches and o ers opportunities to scientists to gain new insight from experimental data. A rst step to this goal is to standardize meaningful and precise terms that are interlinked through a dedicated thesaurus that covers the plant functional diversity domain. Therefore this vocabulary can serve as stable reference resources for integration purposes, speci cally when published in RDF language and available as linked data on the web. This manuscript presents a web infrastructure, named Thesauform, that fully exploits the key principles of the web of data and its common open data structures in order to guide the plant functional diversity community of experts to build collectively, manage, visualize and query a SKOS thesaurus. A thesaurus dedicated to plant functional traits is used to demonstrate the potential of the approach. Indeed, the thesaurus, built using the Thesauform tool, is used to semantically annotate heterogeneous data sources, such as the TRY database or the Plant Ontology. Then, a faceted search system, based on SKOS collections, enabling thesaurus browsing according to each end-users requirements is expected to greatly enhance the data discovery in the context of biodiversity studies.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Tool</kwd>
        <kwd>Faceted Search</kwd>
        <kwd>Thesaurus</kwd>
        <kwd>Semantic annotation</kwd>
        <kwd>Functional diversity</kwd>
        <kwd>Web of Data</kwd>
        <kwd>Plant Trait</kwd>
        <kwd>Controlled vocabulary</kwd>
        <kwd>Interoperability</kwd>
        <kwd>SKOS</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        Introduction
Resolution of key biodiversity issues goes through continued exchanges and
cooperation between related domains, such as ecology, taxonomy, genomic,
climatology, soil sciences, etc [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ], [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ], [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ]. To address biodiversity issues, it is now
widely accepted that a functional approach has strong potential. Indeed,
biological traits of organisms have great capabilities to promote a better understanding
and to predict global change consequences on the functioning of ecosystems and
the services they provide to human societies [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ], [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ], [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ], [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]. A functional trait
is de ned as: \any morphological, physiological or phenological feature
measurable at the individual level, from the cell to the whole-organism level, without
reference to the environment or any other level of organization" [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Over the last decades, trait-based research has generated huge volumes of
data, within multiple contexts of observations and experiments [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ]. Considering
this, data can be acquired via speci c studies and are in uenced by peculiar
goals. Additionally, these data sets can also be obtained via very di erent study
contexts and are often described in highly specialized terms. Numerous traits
can be measured, for instance, on plants [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ], [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ], [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ], [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ]. However, data
representation and storage do not constitute a major challenge. This is why data
generated by functional ecology are only minimally reused or shared within the
community, or over communities, mainly due to data heterogeneity. Given these
limitations, open web standards and the generation of open web standards for
functional ecology would advance the integration of heterogeneous content, with
the primary objective of the emergence of new knowledge.
      </p>
      <p>
        Our primary concern, which focuses on access, sharing and dissemination of
information within a community of experts, is oriented towards the semantic
web. The web of data [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
        ], [14] provides the concepts, methods and tools, which
allow a gradual slide from a web that mostly supports sharing documents to a
web that focuses on the sharing of data to ensure their joint and concerted use
by software agents. The web of data is primarily based on the key principles of
metadata and controlled vocabularies or even ontologies, which should be
considered complementary. Thesaurus, which is a type of controlled vocabularies,
bypass ambiguity issues in natural language, in order to control and to clarify
the access and exchange of information and to facilitate communication.
Consequently a thesaurus re ects deliberate choices of communities relatively to the
key terms in their expertise eld. SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization
System) [15] provides a common format to manage thesaurus adequately. The need
for the simultaneous use of multiple vocabularies being increasing in a context
of biodiversity studies, SKOS o ers not only the mean to build and to publish a
thesaurus on the web, but also to anticipate the establishment of cross-references
between thesauri. Accordingly, each thesaurus can be considered as a publicly
available relevant resource on the web and can be enriched via meaningful
navigation between thesauri, when properly described in an adequate format.
      </p>
      <p>
        In this paper, we present a complete system dedicated to the ecological
community allowing it to create, manage, visualize and query a SKOS thesaurus.
The nal purpose of the thesaurus is to facilitate the integration and the
navigation of the information available in multiple data sources. Our previous work
focused on how metadata could be exploited during the collaborative building of
a thesaurus, through edition and extension mechanisms using the Thesauform
tool. The functional plant trait thesaurus (TOP thesaurus, for Trait Of Plant
Thesaurus) was built using the Thesauform tool. In this paper, our goal is now
to demonstrate the full capabilities of the TOP thesaurus. First, the TOP
thesaurus is used to establish mappings between TOP concepts and other data
sources, as for instance the TRY database [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ] and the Plant Ontology (PO) [16],
[17], in a vision of open data sources, in order to both interconnect available
information, and semantically annotate data organized into these data sources.
Secondly, the TOP thesaurus is exploited through a faceted search engine that
re ects end-users interests and preferences, to facilitate the appropriation of the
TOP thesaurus by end-users. The facets then act as access points on the
interrelated data sources in guiding their navigation. The TOP thesaurus then
fully plays its role by supporting the functional plant trait community to
manage existing and future datasets and to interconnect them with data from other
relevant domains.
      </p>
      <p>This article is organized as follow:
- Section 2 introduces the approach driven with the Thesauform tool to build
a functional plant trait thesaurus as a collaborative product. Once the thesaurus
has been built, it serves as stable reference resources for integration purposes and
it is used to semantically annotate heterogeneous data sources, such as the TRY
database or the Plant Ontology.</p>
      <p>- Section 3 explains how faceted search enhances the information retrieval.
This section gives an overview of the technologies used to query a SKOS
thesaurus using end-user preferences.</p>
      <p>- Section 4 consists of the implementation of our approach. This section
presents the key features of the TOP thesaurus-browsing interface based on
faceted search and how this interface is used by functional ecology expert to nd
relevant information about functional plant traits.</p>
      <p>- Finally, section 5 summarizes and discusses the strengths of our approach
and refers to future work.
2</p>
      <p>Developing a collective thesaurus: the example of the
TOP thesaurus
In order to build a collective thesaurus, our recent work focused on the
development of a tool, named Thesauform, dedicated to assist domain experts in
their task. The Thesauform tool fully relies on semantic web standards, while
providing a exible and user-friendly environment for domain experts [18]. The
process of thesaurus co-construction was divided into two phases: (i) an
edition phase, during which experts can perform a number of actions in relation
to the construction of the vocabulary (addition/deletion of terms and concepts,
change of de nitions, addition of a commentary, etc.), and (ii) a validation phase,
where experts can validate or invalidate the results of the activities completed
during the previous edition phase through a voting procedure. The functional
plant trait community has used the Thesauform tool to describe the di erent
functional plant traits in use in the domain.</p>
      <p>A part of the TOP thesaurus, based upon the Thesauform, is shown on
Table 1. Twenty di erent experts from the functional plant trait community
collaboratively developed the TOP thesaurus. Currently the TOP thesaurus is
composed of about 1200 terms regrouped into approximately 1000 concepts.
The TOP thesaurus can be used as a bibliographic resource about plant traits
information, since it is available as a web resource. For each trait concept, a
preferred term, a de nition associated to a bibliographic reference and a broader
term are provided. In some cases, synonyms (alternative terms), abbreviation,
related terms and narrower terms are also speci ed, as well as a preferred unit 3
. For instance, the widely used trait \Speci c Leaf Area", also known under the
abbreviation SLA, is de ned as \the one sided area of a fresh leaf divided by its
oven-dry mass" in Cornelissen et al. 2003, and its measurement unit is expressed
in meter squared by kilogram of dry mass (m2kg-1[DM]). In the thesaurus, this
trait is linked to di erent other traits. Indeed, it falls under the broader concept
of Morphology and it is related to the Leaf Blade Thickness and the Leaf Mass
per Area concepts.</p>
      <p>The TOP thesaurus serves as a stable reference resource by organizing traits
and their information. It extends beyond the users needs by linking
information about traits to di erent available data sources with the purpose of both
enriching and facilitating data interpretation, which requires information from
di erent domains. Consequently, TOP thesaurus concepts have been linked to
two di erent data sources, the TRY database and the Plant Ontology (PO).
A real advantage of SKOS is to provide properties dedicated to the
establishment of cross-references between thesauri. The mapping apporoaches, on one
hand between the TOP thesaurus and the TRY database and on the other hand
the TOP thesaurus and PO, rely on the exactMatch and relatedMatch SKOS
properties.</p>
      <p>The advantage of linking TOP thesaurus concepts to TRY, the biggest
functional plant traits database (about 800 traits are measured in TRY on more than
60000 di erent plant species), is double. First, the mapping TOP/TRY allows
TOP thesaurus to unify the access to TRY data, managing the heterogeneity
terms used to describe TRY data. Secondly, such a mapping will show the TRY
observation number and the geo-referenced observation number for each mapped
trait, or the number of di erent species, on which a given trait has been
measured. This information can be useful to account for both the community interest
for a given trait or the data available on a trait.
3 The SKOS vocabulary has been expanded to add this information to the TOP
thesaurus, considering the importance of the measurement units for trait data
interpretation and quality
) T
t r
r e
m
r
e
T
d
e
t
a
l
e
,
s f
ru i(
u
sa rm
eh te
t r</p>
      <p>e
P w
O ro
T r</p>
      <p>a
e n
th ,)
n y
i n
t a
n f
se i(
e
r
p r</p>
      <p>e
s t
t
ia re
r
t d</p>
      <p>a
e o
h r
t b
f ,
o e
t c
e n
s e
b r</p>
      <p>e
u f
s e</p>
      <p>r
A d
. e
2 t
01 ica
2 o
. s
l s
a a
te d</p>
      <p>n
te a
ro on
e
c
L
:
- ]
gk M
A
L
S
a r
t
h
g
i
e d
h e</p>
      <p>v
ice tgh t r
n e
a s
n l b</p>
      <p>Sp le P o
y
t
i
v
e
g
n
o
l
f
a
e
M
:
T</p>
      <p>T</p>
      <p>T T T T T T T T T
B N</p>
      <p>B</p>
      <p>B B N N N N N N N N</p>
      <p>C e C e
c
c
n 3
se 0
s 0
i
,
e
n se
n io is
e
r e t l</p>
      <p>e ,
e h n n l.
f t r
e f e o t
0 se 0
0 s 0
2 i</p>
      <p>l
a r
e ,
n l.</p>
      <p>a
o t
m
i
2 y r
r
d G
n d 93 r</p>
      <p>a
e n 9 o t
n
o
i
t
i
n
e
D
o y tn ss</p>
      <p>p sy
d y g o
n b in n to
e a</p>
      <p>m c
ov ed it le</p>
      <p>y
a re r
m u
o f
t
a e
a r
h e e eo ap th io
p l
p</p>
      <p>t
d 's
v ltan lov
n
m um ehn fto tr
w s</p>
      <p>s
e n e s i</p>
      <p>n i
/ )
t r
r e
m
r
e
T
d
e
t
a
l
e
R
m
]
M
h
p
r
o
a
e
r
a
p
S
lfea reaa teh
,
e t
t n
ra la
e
v
i
t
e t
r :
la em ,e ro i
h
t</p>
      <p>t
w e o</p>
      <p>v o
t g t
S ra e la :
T</p>
      <p>v re
N th it
h te
S a</p>
      <p>r
T</p>
      <p>N th
p ,e
h
t le t
w o r</p>
      <p>a
a rgow ltre :
ro h h ev oo</p>
      <p>Wt i
:G :
w ta :R ,</p>
      <p>e</p>
      <p>T t
T T ro le</p>
      <p>a r e
B N g r N r g r
f
a ,
e e ow
LT tra rg
N th iev
w ta
o l
R
G
,
s
n 2
av 79
E 1
la w
e ro</p>
      <p>R g
M
S
m
s
s
a
e
r
o
p
s
a
i
en 03 on 993
s
0 s
2
s
i
l
e ,
n l.
r
o t
p 1</p>
      <p>,
m l.</p>
      <p>h t
a o a
n
o f</p>
      <p>o
and isen ity th
e
e h
r t i</p>
      <p>m un ow
th i
d
d s</p>
      <p>i
e w h</p>
      <p>c
h h a t
t t e
r
g
h if .t
g te ra
n a p
f g
o n g e r t</p>
      <p>n l
e le i t n
id so i
n la
u p
c
n s
a
i</p>
      <p>on iv h
r i
a s
v n t
e
d t r r</p>
      <p>g e o
h e
g l
n p t</p>
      <p>e n
e
h im ie y h la</p>
      <p>T d h b T p</p>
      <p>PO, which is a controlled vocabulary describing plant entities, is of great
interest for plant traits, since plant traits are measured on plant tissues or organs.
The mapping established between TOP thesaurus concepts and PO concepts
allow assigning a reference for the plant entities cited in most trait de nitions.
Moreover, such a mapping approach will be highly bene cial to link data used
in ecology or agronomy to data used in genomics. In fact, PO is mainly used
by this latter eld and provides the opportunity to serve as a rst unifying
component between the ecological and the genomic world, both of high interest
in biodiversity studies.</p>
      <p>The TOP thesaurus ful lls its initial role to provide standard vocabulary
available to the functional ecology community, and extends beyond the basic
needs to ease information retrieval. In this context, a system considering
enduser points of view has been developed and o ers a faceted search engine.
3</p>
      <p>
        Information retrieval: Faceted search
Information retrieval using free text search is confronted with limitations in
terms of accuracy of the result [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ], [19]. The use of controlled term and
concepts coming from a thesaurus would enhance data queries [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ]. Classic semantic
search engines based on controlled terms have been widely used to query data
in life science elds. Bioportal4 [20] is a web portal providing the interrogation
of multiple ontologies or controlled vocabularies based on controlled terms. This
kind of search mechanism su ers from limitations, since it can be di cult for
an unexperienced end-user to nd relevant controlled terms. In fact, with classic
semantic search engines, most of the time controlled terms are displayed using
auto-completed search elds. To overcome this limitation, faceted search engines
are an interesting solution as they facilitate the thesaurus appropriation by the
end-users. In such search engines, the results are ltered using relevant
parameters or categories, each category re ecting the need of users in the thesaurus
navigation environment.
      </p>
      <p>On the MUMIA 5 web site, faceted search (also called faceted navigation or
faceted browsing) is de ned as: \a technique for accessing a collection of
information, allowing users to explore by ltering available information. A faceted
classi cation system allows the assignment of multiple classi cations to an
object, enabling the classi cations to be ordered in multiple ways, rather than in
a single, pre-determined, taxonomic order". Each facet typically corresponds to
the common features shared by a set of objects. Faceted searches are commonly
used by e-commerce websites to lter the available products based on the
parameters most important for the user choice.</p>
      <p>Faceted search systems can be applied to SKOS thesaurus. SKOS good
practices describe how to represent such a system in a SKOS compliant way [21].
Facets are closely linked to both thesaurus information visualization and
thesaurus information restitution, but not to thesaurus structure or to the
infor4 http://bioportal.bioontology.org/
5 http://www.mumia-network.eu/index.php/working-groups/wg4
mation it carries. In thesaurus or in any other controlled vocabulary, concepts
can be assembled into semantically meaningful groups, corresponding to facets.
Consequently, facets can be de ned as skos:collection [21], [22], [23], gathering
concepts with common features. For instance, the functional plant trait
concept Speci c Leaf Area (2) can be grouped with the concepts Leaf Phenology or
Leaf Lifespan, because these three concepts share the common feature of being
measured on the same plant part, the leaf. But Speci c Leaf Area may also be
classi ed with the Xylem Area concept, because these two measurements refer
to a size measurement, the area. The categories plant organ and measurement
type can then be consider as two access points to query thesaurus. Each user
can choose, which access point to use according to own preference.</p>
      <p>Faceted search system is so of prior interest to assist users in their
information retrieval. Developing such a system based on facets allows taking users
interest into account and then to guide dataset consultation. Having data sources
semantically annotated with TOP thesaurus concepts can bene t from faceted
search engines as well, because thesaurus facets are used as an access point to
disseminate information from heterogeneous data sources.
4</p>
      <p>Results: approach implementation, user interface
TOP thesaurus trait information will be mainly accessed by experts from the
ecology domain. Considering this, we based our work on an user-friendly and
easy to use interface, to assist experts in their access and retrieval of pertinent
information. In this section we present the key features of our system6.
4.1</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Semantic search engine</title>
      <p>Search is a crucial feature for focused information retrieval. We propose two types
of semantic search approaches to access functional plant trait information (cf. 1).
First, a classic semantic search engine is available and allows nding traits with
controlled trait terms from the TOP thesaurus through an auto-completed eld
search and a navigation tree. A unique aspect of our work is the implementation
of a faceted search engine based on skos collections. This enhanced the semantic
search of trait by providing the opportunity to the users to choose his own lters.
In Figure 1, end-user selected categories from the available facets (the selected
categories are colored in green). The result of such a selection is dynamically
updated in the result part.
4.2</p>
      <p>External data sources mapping
To address to need of biodiversity studies and to enhance the cooperation and
the sharing of heterogeneous data inside the functional plant trait community
6 For the features concerning the collaborative thesaurus building using the
Thesauform tool, please refer to Laporte et al. 2012.
and over di erent related domains, speci c information for each TOP thesaurus
term has been enriched with existing data standard. In Figure 2, the interface
displays the results obtained after a query on the TOP thesaurus. The rst part
of the interface is dedicated to information speci c to plant trait, resulting of
the collaborative edition of the thesaurus by the community experts. The second
part of the interface is about the information from external data sources. For
instance, 65157 observations are referenced in the TRY database about Speci c
Leaf Area.
4.3</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Technologies used</title>
      <p>We implement a \thin-client/application server" architecture using the J2EE
platform, with the system application server being deployed on Apache Tomcat.
We used the Jena API to manage the aspects related to the manipulation of
the SKOS thesaurus. As we developed a traditional web application, we utilize
jquery libraries to support dynamic aspects.</p>
      <p>
        Conclusion and perspectives
Recent studies highlight the crucial need to dispose thesaurus in the eld of
biodiversity and more precisely in the eld of plant diversity [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ], [24]. Plant trait
research is complex and requires information from di erent domains to fully
exploit plant trait data. Consequently, we propose a complete system designed
to the needs of the plant trait community. Such a system provides a tool to build
a SKOS thesaurus, assists a community of experts to manage their datasets, and
to interconnect them with data and data standards from related communities
using the trait thesaurus. We argue that the end-user preferences have to be
of prime importance in data access and retrieval. In this context, a faceted
search engine demonstrates its full capabilities. Having data sources semantically
annotated with TOP thesaurus concepts can bene t from faceted search engine
traits and can be used to access disseminated information from heterogeneous
data sources. The approach championed in this paper has been to base our work
on the continuity of the Open Linked Data initiative .
      </p>
      <p>The impact of the present work is therefore far reaching. First we propose
that, just as the molecular biology community has succeeded in during the past
twenty years, the functional ecology community has to widely use controlled
vocabularies, thesaurus and ontology, including the TOP thesaurus, in order to
describe and annotate their data in the future years. Second, the available data
sets have to be made open source. Third, as illustrated by the use case described
in this paper and based on mapping approaches with existing controlled
vocabularies or ontologies enhancing data interoperability, the data could reveal their
huge capabilities. We highlighted numerous relevant ontologies for such a
problematic on the NCBO BioPortal. A next step will be to propose more mapping
to external resources (both data and controlled vocabularies/ontologies) with
the TOP thesaurus. A signi cant limitation to this kind of approach in an era
of Linked Data is to dispose of controlled vocabularies and ontologies compliant
with RDF and all the ensuing Semantic Web standards.
14. T.Berners-Lee: linked data
15. Isaac, A., Summers, E.: SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Primer.</p>
      <p>W3C Technical Report (2008)
16. Walls, R., Cooper, L., Elser, J., Stevenson, D.: The Plant Ontology: A Common</p>
      <p>Reference Ontology for Plants. wiki.plantontology.org (2010) 2010
17. Cooper, L., Walls, R.L., Elser, J., Gandolfo, M.a., Stevenson, D.W., Smith, B.,
Preece, J., Athreya, B., Mungall, C.J., Rensing, S., Hiss, M., Lang, D., Reski, R.,
Berardini, T.Z., Li, D., Huala, E., Schae er, M., Menda, N., Arnaud, E., Shrestha,
R., Yamazaki, Y., Jaiswal, P.: The plant ontology as a tool for comparative plant
anatomy and genomic analyses. Plant &amp; cell physiology 54(2) (February 2013) e1
18. Laporte, M.A., Mougenot, I., Garnier, E.: ThesauForm|Traits: A web based
collaborative tool to develop a thesaurus for plant functional diversity research.</p>
      <p>Ecological Informatics (May 2012)
19. Shrestha, R., Arnaud, E., Mauleon, R., Senger, M., Davenport, G.F., Hancock, D.,
Morrison, N., Bruskiewich, R., McLaren, G.: Multifunctional crop trait ontology
for breeders' data: eld book, annotation, data discovery and semantic enrichment
of the literature. AoB plants 2010 (January 2010) plq008
20. Noy, N.F., Shah, N.H., Whetzel, P.L., Dai, B., Dorf, M., Gri th, N., Jonquet, C.,
Rubin, D.L., Storey, M.A., Chute, C.G., Musen, M.a.: BioPortal: ontologies and
integrated data resources at the click of a mouse. Nucleic acids research 37(Web
Server issue) (July 2009) W170{3
21. Baker, T., Bechhofer, S., Isaac, A., Miles, A., Schreiber, G., Summers, E.: Key
Choices in the Design of Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS). eprint
arXiv:1302.1224 (2013)
22. Brugman, H., Malaise, V., Gazendam, L.: A Web Based General Thesaurus</p>
      <p>Browser to Support Indexing of Television and Radio Programs. 6{9
23. Suominen, O., Viljanen, K., Hyv Anen, E.: User-Centric Faceted Search for
Semantic Portals. In Franconi, E., Kifer, M., May, W., eds.: The Semantic Web: Research
and Applications. Volume 4519 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer
Berlin Heidelberg (2007) 356{370
24. Catapano, T., Hobern, D., Lapp, H., Morris, R.A., Morrison, N., Noy, N.,
Schildhauer, M., Thau, D.: Recommendations for the Use of Knowledge Organisation
Systems by GBIF. Global Biodiversity (2011)</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jones</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schildhauer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Reichman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bowers</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>The New Bioinformatics: Integrating Ecological Data from the Gene to the Biosphere</article-title>
          .
          <source>Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics</source>
          <volume>37</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ) (
          <year>December 2006</year>
          )
          <volume>519</volume>
          {
          <fpage>544</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Reichman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jones</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schildhauer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Challenges and Opportunities of Open Data in Ecology</article-title>
          .
          <source>Science</source>
          <volume>331</volume>
          (
          <issue>6018</issue>
          ) (
          <year>February 2011</year>
          )
          <volume>703</volume>
          {
          <fpage>705</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Michener</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jones</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Ecoinformatics: supporting ecology as a dataintensive science</article-title>
          .
          <source>Trends in ecology &amp; evolution</source>
          <volume>27</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ) (
          <year>February 2012</year>
          )
          <volume>85</volume>
          {
          <fpage>93</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lavorel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Garnier</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E.:
          <article-title>Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail</article-title>
          .
          <source>Functional Ecology</source>
          <volume>16</volume>
          (
          <issue>5</issue>
          ) (
          <year>October 2002</year>
          )
          <volume>545</volume>
          {
          <fpage>556</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D</given-names>
            <surname>az</surname>
          </string-name>
          , S.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fargione</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chapin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tilman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being</article-title>
          .
          <source>PLoS biology 4</source>
          (
          <issue>8</issue>
          ) (
          <year>August 2006</year>
          ) e277
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Naeem</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bunker</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>TraitNet: furthering biodiversity research through the curation, discovery, and sharing of species trait data</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, and Human Wellbeing: An Ecological and Economic Perspective</source>
          . (
          <year>2009</year>
          )
          <volume>281</volume>
          {
          <fpage>289</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Garnier</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Navas</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.L.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>A trait-based approach to comparative functional plant ecology: concepts, methods and applications for agroecology. A review. cef-cfr</article-title>
          .
          <source>ca (Umr 5175)</source>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Violle</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Navas</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vile</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kazakou</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fortunel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hummel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Garnier</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E.:
          <article-title>Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos (116) (</article-title>
          <year>2007</year>
          )
          <volume>882</volume>
          {
          <fpage>892</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kattge</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ogle</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bonisch</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Diaz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lavorel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Madin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nadrowski</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nollert</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sartor</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wirth</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>A generic structure for plant trait databases</article-title>
          .
          <source>Methods in Ecology &amp; Evolution</source>
          (
          <year>2010</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hendry</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Grime</surname>
            <given-names>J.P:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Methods in comparative plant ecology</article-title>
          .
          <source>Chapman &amp; Hall</source>
          , London (
          <year>1993</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cornelissen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.H.C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lavorel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Garnier</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>D az</surname>
          </string-name>
          , S.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Buchmann</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gurvich</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Reich, P.B.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Steege</surname>
          </string-name>
          , H.T., Morgan, H.D.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Heijden</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.G.a.V.D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pausas</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Poorter</surname>
          </string-name>
          , H.:
          <article-title>A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide</article-title>
          .
          <source>Australian Journal of Botany</source>
          <volume>51</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2003</year>
          )
          <fpage>335</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Knevel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bekker</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bakker</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kleyer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Life-history traits of the Northwest European ora: The LEDA database</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Vegetation Science</source>
          <volume>14</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2003</year>
          )
          <volume>611</volume>
          {
          <fpage>614</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Berners-Lee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Semantic Web</article-title>
          .
          <source>Conference XML</source>
          <year>2000</year>
          (
          <year>2001</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>