<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2014</year>
      </pub-date>
      <abstract>
        <p>Quantified  Self  (QS),  also  known  as  Personal  Informatics  (PI),  is  a  school  of  thought  that  aims  to  use   technology  for  acquiring  and  collecting  data  on  different  aspects  of  the  daily  lives  of  people.  These  data   can  be  internal  states  (such  as  mood  or  glucose  level  in  the  blood)  or  indicators  of  performance  (such   as  the  kilometers  run).  The  purpose  of  collecting  these  data  is  self-­‐monitoring,  performed  in  order  to   gain  self-­‐knowledge  or  some  kind  of  change  or  improvement  (behavioral,  psychological,  therapeutic,   etc.).  Although  the  current  spread  on  the  market  of  these  kinds  of  tools,  many  issues  arise  when  we   consider  their  usage  in  the  daily  lives  of  common  people,  such  as  the  meaningfulness  and  utility  of  the   gathered  data  for  the  final  users.   We  can  think  to  address  some  of  these  issues  looking  beyond  the  Quantified  Self  for  finding  new   technologies  and  design  techniques  that  could  be  applied  to  this  field.   One  of  the  main  challenges  of  self-­‐tracking  data  is  that  it  comes  in  heterogeneous  and  often  very   unstructured  form.  One  of  the  possible  ways  is  leveraging  Semantic  Web  techniques  for  integrating   heterogeneous  data  originated  from  different  devices  and  applications  and  give  them  some  kind  of   structure.  In  Quantified  Self,  in  fact,  the  information  gathered  by  QS  tools  are  scattered  in  autonomous   silos,  that  can  hardly  be  meshed  together  in  order  to  provide  users  a  complete  and  satisfying  mirror  of   their  behaviors  and  physical  or  psychological  states.  Besides,  often  QS  tools  simply  juxtapose  different   data  in  their  visualizations  but  they  are  not  able  to  highlight  meaningful  correlations  and  provide   structures  for  the  data  gathered.   Given  that  the  quantified-­‐self  trend  is  just  gaining  momentum,  it  is  not  unlikely  that  we  will  soon  have   more  and  more  users  who  create  their  own  personal  repositories,  also  referred  to  lifelogs.    Structuring   the  data  in  these  lifelogs  is  of  particular  importance  in  the  context  of  user  modeling.  User  Modeling   techniques  can  provide  useful  insights  for  reasoning  on  data  gathered,  since  users  are  not  only  in   search  of  the  possibility  to  visualize  their  behavioral  data,  but  also  to  receive  useful  suggestions  for   improving  their  habits  and  behavior.  Although  QS  tools  have  at  their  disposal  huge  amount  of  data  on   user  behavior,  they  are  not  currently  exploiting  them  for  modeling  users  and  providing  them   personalized  recommendations.     In  this  workshop  we  tried  to  investigate  challenges,  open  issues  and  new  perspectives  related  to  the   dominion  of  data  employed  in  Quantified  Self  and  Personal  Informatics  technologies.   The  workshop  organizers:  </p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Amon  Rapp  Università  di  Torino  </title>
      <p>Frank  Hopfgartner,  Technische  Universität  Berlin  
Till  Plumbaum,  Technische  Universität  Berlin  
Judy  Kay,  University  of  Sydney  
Bob  Kummerfeld,  University  of  Sydney  
Eelco  Herder,  L3S  Research  Center  Hannover    
Program    
(accepted  papers)  </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Na  Li,  Dublin  City  University  </title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Alessandro  Marcengo,  Telecom  Italia  </title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Jochen  Meyer,  OFFIS,  Germany  </title>
      <p>Program  Committee  
Federica  Cena,  Silvia  Likavec,  Amon  Rapp,  Martina  Deplano  and  Alessandro  Marcengo.  Ontologies  for  
Quantified  Self:  a  semantic  approach  
Faisal  Alquaddoomi,  Cameron  Ketcham,  Deborah  Estrin.  The  Email  Analysis  Framework:  Aiding  the  
Analysis  of  Personal  Natural  Language  Texts  
Timothy  Wayne  Cook  and  Luciana  Tricai  Cavalini.  A  Multilevel-­‐Model  Driven  Social  Network  for  
Healthcare  Information  Exchange.  </p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>