<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Defeasible and Ampliative Reasoning: same-same but different.</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Michael J. Maher</string-name>
          <email>m.maher@adfa.edu.au</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>School of Engineering and Information Technology University of New South Wales</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Canberra</addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Defeasible and ampliative reasoning are two sides of the same coin. They use similar techniques, but for very different purposes. This talk will explore these similarities and differences.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body />
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>