<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>iGraph: Intelligent Enterprise Information Logistics?</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Bernd Michelberger</string-name>
          <email>michelbe@hs-weingarten.de</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Bela Mutschler</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Daniel Binder</string-name>
          <email>binderd@hs-weingarten.de</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Jan Meurer</string-name>
          <email>meurerj@hs-weingarten.de</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Markus Hipp</string-name>
          <email>markus.hipp@daimler.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Group Research &amp; Advanced Engineering Daimler AG</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Ulm</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>University of Applied Sciences Ravensburg-Weingarten</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Weingarten</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>27</fpage>
      <lpage>30</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Engineers in the automotive domain are confronted with a huge load of information making it di cult for them to identify the information relevant for performing their tasks. Particularly challenging is the alignment of process information, such as o ces les, checklists, and guidelines with business processes. In previous work, we introduced the concept of process-oriented information logistics (POIL) enabling the intelligent delivery of process information along business processes. In this paper, we present iGraph, an application implementing POIL. Speci cally, iGraph demonstrates how engineers can be supported with relevant process information during the review of product requirements.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>information logistics</kwd>
        <kwd>semantic technology</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>The amount of information engineers are confronted with, makes it a challenging
task to identify and handle the exact information needed to perform their daily
work. During a review, for example, engineers not only have to consider o ce
les and best practices, but also guidelines and handbooks. This information may
be accessed through shared drives, databases, or enterprise portals. However,
engineers are not only interested in quickly accessing information, but additionally
require comprehensive and aggregated information when conducting a review.</p>
      <p>
        To tackle this challenge, information logistics (IL) concepts have been
introduced by researchers and practitioners in recent decades [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. IL aims at delivering
the information to knowledge workers tting their demands best. Information
awareness (e.g., awareness of information quality and ows) and, to a smaller
extent, context awareness (e.g., awareness of the user context for which
personalized information shall be delivered) adopt key roles in IL. However, what
has been neglected by contemporary IL approaches is process-awareness, i.e. the
integrated support of business processes and their tasks.
? This paper was done in the niPRO research project. The research is funded by the
      </p>
      <p>German Federal Ministry of Education and Research under grant number 17102X10.</p>
      <p>
        This weakness has guided our development of process-oriented information
logistics (POIL) as a new paradigm for delivering the right process information,
in the right format and quality, at the right place, at the right point in time,
and to the right people [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. Speci cally, POIL enables a process-oriented and
context-aware delivery of relevant process information to knowledge workers [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        The core component of POIL is a semantic information network (SIN) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ],
a labeled and weighted digraph comprising uni ed information objects (e.g.,
guidelines, best practices), process objects (e.g., tasks, lanes, events), and the
relationships (e.g., \is similar to", \is used after") between them. In particular,
a SIN allows identifying objects linked to each other in the one or other way,
e.g., information objects addressing the same topic or needed when performing
a particular process task. Overall, the SIN constitutes the basis for delivering
relevant information objects to knowledge workers [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Section 2 introduces the application scenario. Section 3 presents iGraph.
Section 4 discusses related work. Section 5 concludes with a summary.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Application Scenario</title>
      <p>The iGraph scenario deals with the review of product requirements documented
as functional speci cations at a large automotive manufacturer. Goal is to
both improve and approve such speci cations. The underlying review process
is knowledge-intensive as it comprises large amounts of process information,
user interaction (e.g., \perform review meeting"), and decision-making (e.g.,
should the document be approved or not?). Three roles are involved: The author
provides the speci cation to be reviewed. The review moderator organizes the
review meetings. The reviewer nally analyzes the provided speci cation and
documents errors, ambiguities, and uncertainties.</p>
      <p>Speci cally, we consider a scenario with one process schema (modeled with
Signavio Process Editor), three process instances (created and managed with
the Activiti Business Process Management (BPM) Platform), and about 300
documents (i.e., process information) such as reviews, templates, and guidelines.
3</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>The iGraph Application</title>
      <p>iGraph1 is a web-based Java application based on the semantic middleware iQser
GIN server 2.0, the web framework Play! 2.1.1, jQuery 1.8.3, D3 3.1.1, HTML5,
and CSS3. The three main features of iGraph are as follows: (1) comprehensive
integration of process information and business processes from heterogeneous
data sources, (2) intelligent syntactic and semantic analysis of integrated
information and process objects, and (3) process-oriented delivery of needed process
information and business processes to knowledge workers.</p>
      <p>
        iGraph implements the architectural layers of our POIL framework [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]: a data
layer, a semantic integration layer, and an application layer. The data layer
concerns the set of data sources to be integrated. For each data source, a so called
1 A screencast of iGraph is available at http://nipro.hs-weingarten.de/screencast.
ContentProvider 2 is implemented. Its main task is to transform proprietary
process information or business processes into generic information and process
objects. The semantic integration layer, in turn, is responsible for the syntactic and
semantic analysis of information and process objects. For this purpose, we use the
semantic middleware iQser GIN server. Goal is to classify and group correlated
objects (e.g., lled-out review templates). Finally, user behavior is investigated,
for example, the frequency of using certain information in the context of speci c
process tasks. Details regarding the semantic integration layer can be found in
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. Finally, the application layer concerns the delivery of process information.
(a) Table-based view of iGraph.
      </p>
      <p>(b) Graph-based view of iGraph.</p>
      <p>In the following we show how iGraph is used. Particularly, we consider a
speci c task of the review process: the author prepares a functional speci cation
for the review and needs a review template for guidance.</p>
      <p>Goal is to identify relevant information objects supporting the review
preparation. For this purpose, iGraph provides a search box. The reviewer enters, for
example, the term \template" into the search box and executes the query. Search
results are listed in a table-based view (cf. Fig. 1a). Each row represents a search
result (i.e., an information object), whereas each column contains detailed
metadata of the found information objects, such as the author or title of an object.
In order to identify related information objects (e.g., addressing the same topic),
iGraph provides a graph-based view (cf. Fig. 1b) showing related information
objects starting from a speci c information object (e.g., a template).</p>
      <p>
        In order to quickly identify relevant information objects, iGraph provides two
fundamental key indicators: the rst algorithm determines the link popularity
(SIN LP for short) of information objects based on the SIN. The second
algorithm determines the rate popularity (SIN RP for short) of information objects
based on user ratings. In [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ], we presented both algorithms in detail as well as
as an empirical investigation proving that our algorithms can replace the costly
and time-intensive human determination of relevant information objects.
2 Our ContentProviders are available at http://sourceforge.net/directory/?q=nipro.
      </p>
      <p>Michelberger et al.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Related Work</title>
      <p>
        Various approaches have been proposed in the eld of IL. As examples consider
data warehousing (DWH), business intelligence (BI) solutions, decision support
systems (DSS), and enterprise content management (ECM). However, these
approaches su er from several weaknesses. For example, DWH rather focuses on
the creation of an integrated database. Traditional BI, in turn, addresses data
analytics and is usually isolated from business process execution. Conventional
DSS support complex business decision-making at the management level. By
contrast, ECM deals with the management of information across enterprises
referring to related strategies, methods, and tools. Applications enabling IL are
available, for example, in the elds of wearable computing [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ], weather forecast
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ], or the healthcare domain [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]. A more detailed overview can be found in our
comprehensive literature survey [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ].
5
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Summary</title>
      <p>This paper presents iGraph, an application applying semantic technology to
enable the integration, analysis, and delivery of process information to knowledge
workers. The simple visualization of iGraph, both in a table-based and
graphbased view, as well as the two key indicators SIN LP and SIN RP make it easy
to identify relevant process information during business process execution.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Michelberger</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Andris</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Girit</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mutschler</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>A Literature Survey on Information Logistics</article-title>
          .
          <source>in: Proc. 16th Int'l Conf. on Business Information Systems (BIS'13)</source>
          , pp.
          <fpage>138</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>150</lpage>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Poznan</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Michelberger</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mutschler</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Reichert</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Process-oriented Information Logistics: Aligning Enterprise Information with Business Processes</article-title>
          .
          <source>in: Proc. 16th IEEE Int'l EDOC Conf. (EDOC'12)</source>
          , pp.
          <fpage>21</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>30</lpage>
          , Beijing (
          <year>2012</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hipp</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Michelberger</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mutschler</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Reichert</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>A Framework for the Intelligent Delivery and User-adequate Visualization of Process Information</article-title>
          . in
          <source>: Proc. 28th Symp. On Applied Computing (SAC'13)</source>
          , pp.
          <fpage>1383</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1390</lpage>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Coimbra</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Michelberger</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mutschler</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hipp</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Reichert</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Determining the Link and Rate Popularity of Enterprise Process Information</article-title>
          . in
          <source>: Proc. 21st Int'l Conf. on Cooperative Information Systems (CoopIS'13)</source>
          , pp.
          <fpage>112</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>129</lpage>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Graz</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Heuwinkel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Deiters</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Konigmann, T., Lo eler, T.:
          <article-title>Information Logistics and Wearable Computing</article-title>
          .
          <source>in: Proc. 23rd Int'l Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCS'03)</source>
          , pp.
          <fpage>283</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>289</lpage>
          , Los Alamitos (
          <year>2003</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jaksch</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pfennigschmidt</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sandkuhl</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Thiel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Information Logistic Applications for Information-on-Demand Scenarios: Concepts and Experiences from WIND Project</article-title>
          .
          <source>in: Proc. 29th EUROMICRO Conf.</source>
          , pp.
          <fpage>141</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>147</lpage>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Belek</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Heuwinkel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Deiters</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Information logistics, E-Healthcare and Trust</article-title>
          .
          <source>in: Proc. Int'l Conf. e-Society (IADIS'03)</source>
          , 2, pp.
          <fpage>791</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>794</lpage>
          , Lisbon (
          <year>2003</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>