<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>From Computational Argumentation to Explanation</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Francesca TONI</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of Computing, Imperial College London</institution>
          ,
          <country country="UK">UK</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>In this talk I will overview recent e orts deploying computational
argumentation to obtain and deliver to users explanations of di erent formats for a
variety of systems, including recommenders, classi ers and schedulers. These e orts
rely upon extracting argumentation frameworks comprising sets of arguments and
dialectical relations between them (e.g. of attack and, in addition or instead, of
support), enforcing semantics (de ned either in terms of dialectically acceptable
sets of arguments or of dialectical strength of arguments, satisfying desirable
dialectical properties such as that supports against an argument should strengthen
it) and deploying systems for semantics computation, thus making full use of the
computational argumentation pipeline.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>