<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Persuasive Nature of User-Generated Content in Sharing Economy: Evidence for Entrepreneurship Post-COVID</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Elham Aznab</string-name>
          <email>elhamaznab1400@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Mohammad Akbarnia</string-name>
          <email>mohammad.akbarnia@yahoo.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>University of Tehran</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Tehran</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>University of Tehran</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Tehran</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IR">Iran</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>The user-generated content (UGC) effects on brand image and brand trust in ridehailing have attracted the attention of academic researchers. Specifically, with the emergence of COVID-19 pandemic issue, studying the impact of brand associations on perceptions of ridehailing platforms became much urgent. These researchers come from a variety of disciplines; business, psychology and cultural studies. To realize how UGC can affect customers' intentions to use ride-hailing platforms after the extirpation of COVID-19 crisis, it is vital to define how UGC affects associations in customers' minds. Therefore, this study investigates the issue via examining the impact of reviewing the online content of online platforms on brand image and brand trust of P2P service providers. This critical review examined 50 peer-reviewed articles regarding ride-hailing and UGC effects on brands published during 2010-2020. The topics explored have been: user-generated content effects on marketing and branding, sharing economy, ride-hailing, brand image and brand trust, P2P platforms, customer motivations, sustainable consumption, and hyper consumption. Gaps in the literature and future research topics are explored.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Sharing Economy</kwd>
        <kwd>Ride-hailing</kwd>
        <kwd>User-generated content</kwd>
        <kwd>Intention to use</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        In recent years’ collaborative consumption or sharing economy (SE) has been appealing
to consumers due to their growing concern on climate change, hyper-consumption, and
a growing demand for ownership (Gullstrand Edbring et al., 2016). One major segment
in this market is sharing economy which refers to a wide array of entrepreneurial and
innovative activities in which consumers share privately owned goods with one another
outside the boundaries of the traditional business model
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">(Winterhalter et al., 2015)</xref>
        .
These services allow consumers to have access to products or services without
ownership and allow owners a return on their investment, all through online forums
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">(Barnes
and Mattsson, 2016)</xref>
        .
      </p>
      <p>
        The rise of the sharing economy has been facilitated by the digital marketplace and its
ability to facilitate searching available service providers, reservation processes,
monetary transactions and experience sharing by users. The P2P ride-hailing has several
aspects, which make it unique, even in the realm of the sharing economy. Ride-hailing
activities involve a longer interaction between the consumer and the service provider
than other services
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">(Philip et al., 2015)</xref>
        . This has led to an exploration of topics such as
trust and discrimination
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">(Edelman et al., 2017)</xref>
        , legal issues,
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">(Jefferson-Jones, 2015)</xref>
        ,
and pricing in the P2P segment
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">(Wang and Nicolau, 2017)</xref>
        .
One of the important issues in the context of sharing economy are the risks involved in
using P2P platforms. One of the risks that has become more conspicuous these days is
COVID-19 disease perceived risk which has made the customers less eager to use P2P
ride-hailing platforms available on the internet. Therefore, values of SE firms have
dropped, and many service providers had to stop working
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">(Hossain, 2021)</xref>
        . In spite of
the fact that the COVID-19 has adversely affected the enterprises specifically sharing
economy service providers and their customers, its full impacts are yet to be totally
understood. Indeed, the pandemic caused the SE sector to experience an upheaval.
Corona Virus pandemic manifested the possibility of reducing overconsumption by
collaborative consumption. It became obvious that Airbnb and Uber are the most efficient
sharing economy platforms at casting off the adverse effects of overconsumption
behavior. Understanding the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the SE sector is
therefore essential
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">(Buheji, 2020)</xref>
        .
      </p>
      <p>
        After the elimination of COVID-19 disease, increasing trust on collaborative
consumption will become an important issue. To increase trust, collecting more information
about the host and enhance the intention to use, customers of ride-hailing platforms can
use online reviews, as a form of user-generated-content (UGC). UGC is a way in which
customers engage with others and express themselves via social media. Content
provided by social media users has the capacity to alter customers’ views or convince them
and impact their intention to use
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">(Roma and Aloini, 2019)</xref>
        . The influence of UGC on
customers' intentions to use in the context of ride-hailing has received little
consideration. The goal of this study is to contribute to bridging the gap by using attachment
theory. Attachment theory examines two types of interpersonal relationships that
connect an individual with a specific target: identity-based and bond-based attachments,
both of which influence user involvement and information exchange in virtual
communities (Wan et al., 2017). Bonding-based attachment and identity-based attachment,
according to Kim and Johnson (2016), boost consumers' engagement with various types
of SMEs (Small and Medium Enterprises) and innovative start-ups on social media.
This can result in positive UGC that can, per se, increase product awareness, impact
customers' purchase decisions and convince them to buy.
      </p>
      <p>
        Given the prevalence of online reviews and the plethora of issues associated with them
(such as anonymity and the potential for manipulation
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">(Chevalier and Mayzlin, 2006)</xref>
        ,
it's critical to understand how consumers manage to reduce uncertainty and obtain the
information they want and are willing to trust. Researchers looked at UGC on a variety
of social media platforms, including Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube.
Consumers' expectations of the product or service they get are shaped by these searches. As
a case, major online retailers have allowed consumers to post reviews on their websites
as these reviews have been shown to influence purchase decisions
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">(Sridhar and
Srinivasan, 2012)</xref>
        . According to Kazmi and Mehmood (2016), brand image could
contribute to a company’s success when customers are willing to purchase products or
services at a higher price. In fact, brand image is important for companies’ future benefits
such as long-term cash flow, decisions making, stock cost, sustainable competitive
advantage and achievement in market
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">(Torlak et al., 2014)</xref>
        .
Although a large body of literature has addressed trust (Wang et al., 2014), there is a
lack of study on trust in the sharing economy (Tussyadiah &amp; Park, 2018). The
foundation of economic trades and social contact is trust, which is a driving factor underlying
behavior and social life
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">(Gefen, 2000)</xref>
        .
      </p>
      <p>With these in mind, this study aims to examine the influence of UGC from customers’
perspective in defining a brand and how it influences the customers' willingness to use
ride-sharing platforms. We specifically focus on brand image, brand trust and perceived
usefulness as measures which have received limited attention in the context of
ridehailing.</p>
      <p>The remaining sections of the paper are organized as follows: First, the context of the
study is introduced. Then theoretical concepts are discussed and conceptual model is
presented. The results are discussed afterwards and finally implications and suggestions
for further studies are presented.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Literature</title>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>2.1 sharing economy and ride-hailing</title>
        <p>
          Sharing economy, initially adopted as the term “collaborative consumption” is a new
economic model in which redundant products or services are distributed, shared and
reused through online platforms by individuals or organizations
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">(Wang et al., 2019)</xref>
          .
As an alternative form to traditional distribution channels, sharing economy aims to
preserve natural resources and promote a sense of community
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">(Belk, 2010)</xref>
          . Thus,
sharing economy reflects a global willingness to change values from excessive consumption
to more economical and sustainable solutions to everyday problems
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">(Parguel et al.,
2017)</xref>
          .
        </p>
        <p>
          Many businesses and industries in retail, technology, hospitality, media, finance, and
travel have been affected by sharing economy
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">(Kathan et al., 2016)</xref>
          . Ride-hailing, as
one of the leading businesses in sharing economy in the transportation sector, has
become an increasingly popular model of travel
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">(Wosskow, 2014)</xref>
          . The Ride-sharing
business model refers to transportation in which individual travelers who have similar
routes and identical time schedules ride the same car to go to work or school, a
longdistance trip, travel, etc., and share transportation expenses with each other
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">(Chang et
al., 2018)</xref>
          .
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>2.2 User-generated-content</title>
        <p>
          The patterns upon which the individuals engage have noticeably revolutionized due to
Web 2.0
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26 ref33">(Li and Kim, 2016)</xref>
          . that provides the opportunity of communicating and
cooperating with each other via user-generated content compared with the former
generation of Web in which the individuals were solely limited to view the online material
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">(Thomas, 2019)</xref>
          . Web 2.0, owing to its more flexible design, succeeded to offer more
room for the users to engage in creating their own material online. UGC is an important
tool allowing the individuals, groups, and all type of organizations to express
themselves and communicate with others online by sharing videos, texts, audios, and images
(e.g., YouTube); blogs (e.g., Blogger.com); and social networking sites (e.g.,
Instagram, Facebook)
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14 ref27 ref54">(Kim and Lee, 2017)</xref>
          .
        </p>
        <p>
          The creation of UGC is due to extreme use of social media such as LinkedIn, Instagram
or messenger apps like WhatsApp and Telegram where consumers around the globe
engage in social interactions. Data extracted from UGC can help to have a deeper
understanding of customers’ feeling about their experiences and make perceptions about
unused goods with unknown quality. Therefore, UGC can shape consumer brand
perception
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">(Roma and Aloini, 2019)</xref>
          .
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>2.3 Brand image</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-4">
        <title>Q1. How does UGC affect the brand image?</title>
        <p>
          Brand image is described as the perceptions about the brand reflected by brand
associations held in customers’ memory. Brand image can form consumers’ attitude and
purchase behavior by affecting their perception and evaluation of the brand
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30 ref31 ref34 ref4">(Y. Mao et al.,
2020)</xref>
          . Thus, if a good brand image strategy is adopted, it can distinguish a company’s
brand from its competitors and result in favorable evaluations and associations in the
consumers’ mind
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">(Chin et al., 2018)</xref>
          .
        </p>
        <p>
          Web communications, social networking services and specifically the content
generated by customers in these communities have noticeable impacts on development of
brand image
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">(Jalilvand and Samiei, 2012)</xref>
          . Brand expectations are formed using
information available to the customer through UGC; therefore, potential, actual, or former
customers manipulate brand expectations to create their own favorable brand image
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">(Krishnamurthy and Kumar, 2018)</xref>
          . Characteristics of this content affect its function to
the extent that even valence (positive or negative) content can change customers'
perceptions about the brand
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26 ref33">(Kim and Johnson, 2016)</xref>
          . Based on the results of the study
made by Yap et al. (2013), various UGC motives can have different cognitive or
affective characteristics that affect the expectations of content receivers. For instance, the
results of the study show that famous people who have taken Uber and mentioned
relevant content about this activity on social networking sites helped Uber to promote
Ubers’ brand image
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">(Tseng and Chan, 2019)</xref>
          .
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-5">
        <title>2.4 Brand trust</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-6">
        <title>Q2. How does UGC affect brand trust?</title>
        <p>
          Brand trust refers the willingness of the average consumer to rely on the ability of the
brand to fulfill its promises
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">(Reast, 2005)</xref>
          . Based on consumers’ beliefs and
expectations specific qualities of a brand can make it consistent, competent, honest, and
responsible
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">(Elena and José, 2005)</xref>
          . Brand trust stems from total knowledge of customers
about brand related to their direct usage of the product or service or indirect interaction
with other customers
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">(Reast, 2005)</xref>
          . Sharing an asset with strangers in sharing economy,
is based on trust and reviewing online content can be the beginning of trust formation
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">(Chang and Wang, 2018)</xref>
          . Customers of sharing economy platforms give credit to UGC
not only as a way of decreasing risk and uncertainty to enhance brand trust, but also as
a practical source of usage experience
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14 ref27 ref54">(Choi and Lee, 2017)</xref>
          . Thus, users stablished
online content has turned out to be a measure of assessing trustworthiness of P2P
sharing brands
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">(Belarmino and Koh, 2020)</xref>
          . Trusting a brand, however, is vulnerable to
quality of online content and reviews. Positive UGC about a brand or its products
evokes positive expectations and brand trust which
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-7">
        <title>2.5 Perceived usefulness</title>
        <p>
          Q3. How does brand trust have a significant effect on perceived usefulness?
"Perceived Usefulness" (PU) is defined as "the degree to which a person feels that
employing a certain system will increase his or her work performance," according to
Davis. This is supported by the meaning of the term "useful," which means "able to be
employed usefully". A user believes in the presence of a good use-performance link for
a system with a high perceived usefulness. This is dependent on how customers
anticipate technology to improve their lives
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">(Aldhmour and Sarayrah, 2016)</xref>
          .
Brand trust is an important factor about perceived usefulness. Trust in e-commerce
makes customers believe that companies can provide them with useful services or
products
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">(Tao, 2011)</xref>
          and brand trust that stems from UGC can have noticeable effect
on realizing usefulness of a service or product. Trusting electronic business based on
sharing economy platforms can help customers to realize how collaborative
consumption can be useful in their lives
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">(Califf et al., 2020)</xref>
          . Perceived usefulness is a strong
factor that determines adoption intention through perceived value of a product or
service
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">(Yu et al., 2017)</xref>
          . In ride-sharing, the more useful platforms become, the more they
enhance the positive perception about the value of product or service they offer
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">(Chen,
2016)</xref>
          .
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-8">
        <title>2.6 Intention to use</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-9">
        <title>Q4. How does perceived usefulness have a significant impact on intent to use?</title>
        <p>
          According to Ajzen (1991), intentions are believed to have control over the motivating
aspects which drive a certain type of behavior. Individuals’ enthusiasm for engaging in
an activity and/or spending resources could be observed through one’s intentions.
Generally, the more eager an individual to be engaged in an activity, the more likely they
will do so. As Cao et al (2005) said, restrictions in decision making process might occur
due to some behavioral factors. Moreover, individuals’ claimed intentions are not
always the true ones which is, per se, rooted in social desirability bias and consistency
bias. Intentions accompanied with actions are considered to be the real choice behind
each action, i.e., an individual would conduct an action only if he/she possesses enough
behavioral purpose to do so. intention is the vehicle carrying an individual’s desires,
wishes and/or readiness to engage in an activity in a specific way. Intentions are, in
general, personal guidelines dictating how to act in certain circumstances. Given what
Taylor et al. said, it is possible to expect a certain type of behavior in case consumer’s
intention to use is taken into account properly. The consumer’s eagerness to interact
with an online shop on Web 0.2 is regarded as “intention to transact
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">(Aldhmour and
Sarayrah, 2016)</xref>
          .
        </p>
        <p>
          Participation in collaborative consumption provides customers of a sharing economy
platform with ‘asset-light lifestyle’ via resource allocation
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">(Tussyadiah, 2016)</xref>
          . As
collaborative consumption makes user's life and work easier, there is a more tendency to
participate in this form of consumption
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">(Wang et al., 2019)</xref>
          .
3
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Methodology and results</title>
      <p>
        This search is a critical review which investigates the literature and assesses the related
quality. This goes further than just describing the articles and contains conceptual
innovation and analysis
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">(Grant &amp; Booth, 2009)</xref>
        .
      </p>
      <p>The extant literature of this review article has been conducted regarding the effect of
UGC in ride-hailing as a convincing factor in intention to use during post covid-19. A
deep investigation into the literature has enabled us to discover the noble gaps in the
domain of sharing economy. In order to conduct this study and fill the gaps, 4 questions
were raised as follows;
Q1. How does UGC affect the brand image?
Q2. How does UGC affect brand trust?
Q3. How does brand trust have a significant effect on perceived usefulness?
Q4. How does perceived usefulness have a significant impact on intent to use?
For this critical review, a total of 50 peer-reviewed articles are collected from five
databases: web of Science, EBSCOhost, JURN, Science Direct, and SCOPUS. These
databases were chosen based on the journals that cover UGC and ride-hailing topics such
as business research and journal of cleaner production.</p>
      <p>Hence, in order to find the answers to these questions we defined the scope of our search
in the electronic databases mentioned above. The researchers used a list of keywords
selected based on the first articles published regarding UGC and sharing economy. The
keywords used were: user-generated content, sharing economy, post covid-19,
ridehailing, brand image, brand trust and intention to use
The studies had to be included in the searches explained above in order to enable us to
take advantage of the investigated articles.</p>
      <p>Empirical studies have been included since they are thought to show validated findings
in this field. Based on the search keywords and criteria, we identified 100 initial papers.
In the light of collecting all studies from the databases, the inclusion and exclusion
criteria were proposed for relevant studies. First, we omitted 30 papers based on the
title. The abstracts of the remained 80 articles were decreased to 50 to assure that the
impact of UGC in intention to use is appropriately illustrated. Then, the search review
was conducted based on these 50 articles. Finally, to answer the 4 questions proposed,
we considered 25 papers.</p>
      <p>
        Powered by advanced information technologies, the sharing economy presents an
emerging trend that is transforming the society and the business world today. As shown
in a recent research report, peer-to-peer ridesharing is one of the five key sectors of the
sharing economy and tops the chart. Sharing platforms like Uber have gained a lot of
popularity around the world through technology
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref32">(Z. W. Y. Lee et al., 2018)</xref>
        With regard to the advanced information technology, there is an emerging trend shown
in the domain of sharing economy which could transform both the society and business
world today. Based on the findings of one of the recent reports, peer-to-peer ridesharing
is now one of the five key sectors in sharing economy. In the light of technology
advances, sharing platforms such as Uber have gained considerable amount of popularity
all across the globe.
      </p>
      <p>Most of the citizens in different places of the world have now access to the platforms.
They could create a noticeable amount of content on the social media before the
covid19 quarantines and sharing their opinions on the services provided by these platforms.
However, it is not determined in previous studies that to what extent UGC could affect
Sharing Economy users after the Covid-19 quarantines leading to their intention to use.
Moreover, another issue to examine was to what extent a customer through UGC can
spark intention to use in others based on his/her attachment to one brand.
With regard to all these factors, this study is done with the aim to investigate the impact
of UGC from customers’ perspective to define a brand and how it could affect
customers’ intention to use ride-sharing platforms. We focus specifically on brand image,
brand trust and perceived usefulness.</p>
      <p>
        Finally, in conceptual model 1 it is illustrated that the User-Generated-Content (UGC)
has gained increasing attention as an important indicator of business success in the
tourism and sharing economic sectors
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">(Nilashi et al., 2021)</xref>
        .
      </p>
      <p>UGC in social media could positively affect a brand. As proposed by Jalilvand &amp;
Samiei (2012) internet interactions, social networks’ services and specifically the UGC
on these forums have a considerable amount of effect on brand image. The users are
able to convince others through sharing their experiences and reviews on one brand
such as Uber. Consequently, the potential customers interfere with the expectations
from a brand to create their own desirable brand image. The characteristics of the
content are so determining that they could easily change customer’s perception on the
brand.</p>
      <p>
        Hence, the UGC resulted from widespread use of new technologies plays an important
role in affecting brands’ images, service innovations and determining the profits of
service salespeople.
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30 ref31 ref7">(M. Lee et al., 2020)</xref>
        .
      </p>
      <p>Nilashi et al (2022)in their studies proved that during the Corona Pandemic the UGC
could affect a brand. Moreover, they demonstrated that a brand’s satisfied customer
would tell decent stories on social networks resulting in other web users’ intention to
use. Ergo, according to previous studies, it can be concluded that UGC could have an
impact on a brand and also convince other users.</p>
      <p>
        Sharing an asset with strangers in sharing economy requires trust and reviewing online
content can be the beginning of trust formation
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">(Chang &amp; Wang, 2018)</xref>
        . Customers of
sharing economy platforms give credit to UGC not only as a way of decreasing risk and
uncertainty to enhance brand trust, but also as a practical source of usage experience
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14 ref27 ref54">(Choi &amp; Lee, 2017)</xref>
        . Thus, user-generated content has turned out to be a measure of
assessing trustworthiness of P2P sharing brands
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">(Belarmino and Koh, 2020)</xref>
        .
As shown in previous studies, UGC can have a role in creating trust or mistrust among
the users of a platform in sharing economy. Therefore, when users on social networks
post content about sharing economy such as Uber, others would trust this generated
content and the researches have shown that the users have more trust in UGC than the
companies’ advertisements because it is the users’ real-life experiences
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">(Nilashi et al.,
2022)</xref>
        . Szabo’ &amp; Gupta (2020) demonstrate in their study that trust has an important
role in sharing economy. Ratings and reviews on sharing economy platforms are shown.
For instance, Uber asks the passengers to review their ride because no customer wants
to use Uber’s service with an unreliable car or a driver who would not even considerate
health protocols. Uber’s monitoring the drivers creates a sense of trust among the
customers of this ride-hailing platforms and they could share their opinions about Uber
through UGC. The past studies are aligned with the results of our study. Hence, it could
be claimed that UGC has a lead role in creating trust among users of sharing economy
platforms.
      </p>
      <p>
        On the one hand, brand trust could be considered an important factor in perceived
usefulness. Trust in e-commerce makes customers believe that companies can provide
them with useful services or products
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">(Tao, 2011)</xref>
        and brand trust that stems from UGC
can have noticeable effect on realizing usefulness of a service or product. Trusting
electronic businesses based on sharing economy platforms can assist customers to realize
how collaborative consumption can be useful in their lives
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">(Califf et al., 2020)</xref>
        .
Geng &amp; Chen, 2021 demonstrated in their study that perceived usefulness in sharing
economy platforms is generated by the content which is shared on social media. The
virtual, anonymous, open, and weak group relationship among consumers means we
cannot rely on identity recognition and acquaintance introduction to establish perceived
usefulness. Only through online interaction can we obtain sufficient product
information resources.
      </p>
      <p>Perceived usefulness can be a strong factor in determining intention to accept through
perceived value of a service or product. As mentioned before, perceived usefulness is
generated in the light of UGC and the more useful ride-hailing platforms are, the more
positive perception about the service or product will be. This way, the potential users
are convinced to use the services in ride-hailing sharing economy platforms. As
ToldosRomero &amp; Orozco-Gómez (2015) showed in their research, there is a meaningful and
positive correlation between perceived usefulness and intention to use in sharing
economy platforms such as Uber. This means that the potential users will be more eager
to buy and use the services when perceived usefulness from other users’ perspectives
is higher. This finding from previous studies is totally aligned with our search.
4</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Conclusion and Discussion</title>
      <p>The aim of this study was to examine the impact of UGC on intention to use ride-hailing
platforms. These platforms have received a huge amount of attention from the digital
businesses’ customers via forming the perceptions in their minds. This study
investigated the effect of UGC on brand image and brand trust towards perceived usefulness
and eventually intention to use ride-hailing platforms. It also defines how UGC can
convince others to use ride-sharing platforms.</p>
      <p>
        According to pervious investigations it was expected that online content would affect
characteristics of these messages and influence the receivers' perceptions about
products/services of brands )Yap et al., 2013). However, we found that the UGC is not only
understandable to the receivers of such online massages, but they are also considered
in judging a ride-hailing brand performance. In earlier researches just positivity or
negativity of UGC was an influential factor that could affect intention to use
products/services of a brand
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">(Sweeney et al., 2012)</xref>
        . The difference between these two approaches
can be further studied.
      </p>
      <p>
        This study identifies the effect of UGC from customers’ perspective on two major
associations of brands, which is brand image and brand trust. The findings confirm that
plethora of information brought to customers through reviewing UGC affects their
expectations towards a ride-hailing platform and evokes a specific brand image in
customers’ mind
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44 ref53">(Yap et al., 2013,Tseng and Chan, 2019)</xref>
        . The results show that like other
regular brands
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">(Vahdati and Mousavi Nejad, 2016)</xref>
        . the more favorable a brand is
associated in customers’ mind, the more they are intended to use sharing platforms.
However, at odds with the majority of previous research which considered creation of brand
personality confined to direct usage experience
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">(Toldos-Romero and Orozco-Gómez,
2015)</xref>
        , this study shows that customers can promote the brand image and brand trust
via just reviewing UGC. The difference in findings can be explained by adopting
brand–consumer relationship view which suggests that individuals use interpersonal
relationship norms as guiding principles to connect with brands
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">(Borges-Tiago et al.,
2019)</xref>
        . In this way, customers can share their opinions on one brand with other users
who can decide whether or not to buy the product or service. Eventually perceived
usefulness created by reviewing UGC can develop intention to use ride-hailing services.
Thus, relationships and interactions on social media can create associations of brands.
Due to transformation of brands to become more and more human-like characteristic,
integrating endorsers’ personality traits with other factors impacts brand personality
impressions in customers’ mind
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">(Borges-Tiago et al., 2019)</xref>
        . Consumers of a brand who
express their opinions in form of UGC are the main endorsers of that brand who can
affect brand image and brand trust in the minds of other prospects. In other words,
actual customers are the best individuals who can convince potential customers that the
product or service could meet their needs.
      </p>
      <p>However, in this study the impact of brand image and brand trust was majorly derived
from reviewing online UGC rather than direct regular user experience. Other brands
could also convince the customers whether or not to use other sharing economy
platforms.</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>4.1. Theoretical implications</title>
        <p>
          This study contributes to the existing literature by highlighting the need to examine the
extent to which customers understand UGC. According to Yap et al. (2013) examining
the extent to which customers pay attention to UGC can be a beneficial measure to
assess persuasiveness of online content. One of the key findings of this paper is
demonstrating the noticeable effect of UGC on brand image and brand trust of ride-hailing
platforms. There are limited known examinations that scrutinized the capability of UGC
to inspire brand associations in the minds of non-users of a brand
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">(Christodoulides et
al., 2012)</xref>
          .
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Limitations and further study</title>
      <p>Pervious research toward perceived risk of Influenza showed that majority of people
did not consider it as a serious risk; therefore, further research should be conducted to
define whether the same attitude is adopted by customers of sharing economy platforms
towards the perceived risk of coronavirus or not. Our study shows that UGC has a
noticeable effect on brand perception and association of ride-sharing platforms
specifically during the pandemic which could convince other users. Further studies can
examine the other kinds of online content sharing activities on perceptions about brands
during pandemic disease as well as investigating whether UGC could persuade or dissuade
other users to buy. Finally, since a ride-hailing platform only encompasses limited
aspects of sharing economy platforms, further studies should illustrate the effect of UGC
on brand perceptions, intention to use and convincing users in other forms of
ride-sharing economy platforms.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ajzen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1991</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The theory of planned behavior</article-title>
          .
          <source>Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes</source>
          ,
          <volume>50</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>179</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>211</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Aldhmour</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sarayrah</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>AN INVESTIGATION OF FACTORS INFLUENCING CONSUMERS'INTENTION TO USE ONLINE SHOPPING: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY IN SOUTH OF JORDAN</article-title>
          .
          <source>J. Internet Bank. Commer</source>
          .
          <volume>21</volume>
          , 1.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Barnes</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mattsson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>Building tribal communities in the collaborative economy: an innovation framework</article-title>
          .
          <source>Prometheus</source>
          <volume>34</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>95</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>113</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Belarmino</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Koh</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2020</year>
          .
          <article-title>A critical review of research regarding peer-to-peer accommodations</article-title>
          .
          <source>Int. J. Hosp. Manag</source>
          .
          <volume>84</volume>
          , 102315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.
          <year>2019</year>
          .
          <volume>05</volume>
          .011
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Belk</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2010</year>
          . Sharing.
          <source>J. Consum. Res</source>
          .
          <volume>36</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>715</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>734</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Borges-Tiago</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tiago</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Veríssimo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Silva</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2019</year>
          .
          <article-title>A brand-new world: brand-endorsers-users fit on social media</article-title>
          .
          <source>Acad. Rev. Latinoam. Adm.</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Buheji</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2020</year>
          .
          <article-title>Sharing economy and communities attitudes after covid-19 pandemicreview of possible socio-economic opportunities</article-title>
          .
          <source>Am. J. Econ</source>
          .
          <volume>10</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>395</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>406</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Califf</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Brooks</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Longstreet</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2020</year>
          .
          <article-title>Human-like and system-like trust in the sharing economy: The role of context and humanness</article-title>
          .
          <source>Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change</source>
          <volume>154</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>119968</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cao</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Q.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Seydel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2005</year>
          .
          <article-title>B2C e‐commerce web site quality: an empirical examination</article-title>
          .
          <source>Ind. Manag. data Syst.</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , W.-L.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , J.-Y.,
          <year>2018</year>
          .
          <article-title>Mine is yours? Using sentiment analysis to explore the degree of risk in the sharing economy</article-title>
          .
          <source>Electron. Commer. Res. Appl</source>
          .
          <volume>28</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>141</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>158</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.
          <year>2018</year>
          .
          <volume>01</volume>
          .014
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
          </string-name>
          , S.-Y.,
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>Green helpfulness or fun? Influences of green perceived value on the green loyalty of users and non-users of public bikes</article-title>
          .
          <source>Transp. Policy</source>
          <volume>47</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>149</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>159</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chevalier</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mayzlin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2006</year>
          .
          <article-title>The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews</article-title>
          .
          <source>J. Mark. Res</source>
          .
          <volume>43</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>345</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>354</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lai</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tat</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          .
          <article-title>Determinants of Brand Image and Their Impacts on Purchase Intention of Grab</article-title>
          .
          <source>J. Arts Soc. Sci. 2</source>
          ,
          <fpage>26</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>36</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          14.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Choi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <article-title>Trust in open versus closed social media: The relative influence of user- and marketer-generated content in social network services on customer trust</article-title>
          .
          <source>Telemat. Informatics</source>
          <volume>34</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>550</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>559</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <volume>11</volume>
          .005
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          15.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Christodoulides</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jevons</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bonhomme</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2012</year>
          .
          <article-title>Memo to marketers: Quantitative evidence for change: How user-generated content really affects brands</article-title>
          .
          <source>J. Advert. Res</source>
          .
          <volume>52</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>53</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>64</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          16.
          <string-name>
            <surname>de la Paz</surname>
            Toldos-Romero,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Orozco-Gómez</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2015</year>
          .
          <article-title>Brand personality and purchase intention</article-title>
          .
          <source>Eur. Bus. Rev.</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          17.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Edelman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Luca</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Svirsky</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <article-title>Racial discrimination in the sharing economy: Evidence from a field experiment</article-title>
          .
          <source>Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 9</source>
          ,
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>22</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          18.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Elena</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>José</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2005</year>
          .
          <article-title>Does brand trust matter to brand equity?</article-title>
          <source>J. Prod. Brand Manag</source>
          .
          <volume>14</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>187</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>196</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420510601058
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          19.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gefen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2000</year>
          . E-commerce:
          <article-title>the role of familiarity and trust</article-title>
          .
          <source>Omega</source>
          <volume>28</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>725</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>737</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          20.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Geng</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The Influencing Mechanism of Interaction Quality of UGC on Consumers' Purchase Intention-An Empirical Analysis</article-title>
          .
          <source>Frontiers in Psychology</source>
          ,
          <volume>12</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          21.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Grant</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Booth</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          ).
          <article-title>A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies</article-title>
          .
          <source>Health Information &amp; Libraries Journal</source>
          ,
          <volume>26</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>91</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>108</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation>
          22.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hossain</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2021</year>
          .
          <article-title>The effect of the Covid-19 on sharing economy activities</article-title>
          .
          <source>J. Clean. Prod</source>
          .
          <volume>280</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>124782</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref23">
        <mixed-citation>
          23.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jalilvand</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Samiei</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2012</year>
          .
          <article-title>The impact of electronic word of mouth on a tourism destination choice</article-title>
          .
          <source>Internet Res.</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref24">
        <mixed-citation>
          24.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jefferson-Jones</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2015</year>
          .
          <article-title>Can short-term rental arrangements increase home values?: A case for Airbnb and other home sharing arrangements</article-title>
          .
          <source>A Case Airbnb Other Home Shar. Arrange. (June 1</source>
          ,
          <year>2015</year>
          ).
          <source>Cornell Real Estate Rev</source>
          .
          <volume>13</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref25">
        <mixed-citation>
          25.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kathan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Matzler</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Veider</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>The sharing economy: Your business model's friend or foe? Bus</article-title>
          . Horiz.
          <volume>59</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>663</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>672</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref26">
        <mixed-citation>
          26.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kim</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Johnson,
          <string-name>
            <surname>K.K.P.</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>Power of consumers using social media: Examining the influences of brand-related user-generated content on Facebook</article-title>
          .
          <source>Comput. Human Behav</source>
          .
          <volume>58</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>98</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>108</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref27">
        <mixed-citation>
          27.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kim</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <article-title>Brand-related user-generated content on social media: the roles of source and sponsorship</article-title>
          .
          <source>Internet Res.</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref28">
        <mixed-citation>
          28.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Krishnamurthy</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kumar</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          .
          <article-title>Electronic word-of-mouth and the brand image: Exploring the moderating role of involvement through a consumer expectations lens</article-title>
          .
          <source>J. Retail. Consum. Serv</source>
          .
          <volume>43</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>149</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>156</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref29">
        <mixed-citation>
          29.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lahap</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ramli</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Said</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Radzi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zain</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>A Study of Brand Image towards Customer's Satisfaction in the Malaysian Hotel Industry</article-title>
          .
          <source>Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci</source>
          .
          <volume>224</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>149</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>157</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <volume>05</volume>
          .430
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref30">
        <mixed-citation>
          30.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cai</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>DeFranco</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Exploring influential factors affecting guest satisfaction: Big data and business analytics in consumer-generated reviews</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology.</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref31">
        <mixed-citation>
          31.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.-I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Phua</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wu</surname>
          </string-name>
          , T.-Y.,
          <year>2020</year>
          .
          <article-title>Marketing a health Brand on Facebook: Effects of reaction icons and user comments on brand attitude, trust, purchase intention, and eWOM intention</article-title>
          .
          <source>Health Mark. Q</source>
          .
          <volume>37</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>138</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>154</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref32">
        <mixed-citation>
          32.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Z. W. Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T. K. H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Balaji</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chong</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A. Y.-L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Why people participate in the sharing economy: an empirical investigation of Uber</article-title>
          . Internet Research.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref33">
        <mixed-citation>
          33.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Li</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kim</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>One wiki, two groups: Dynamic interactions across ESL collaborative writing tasks</article-title>
          .
          <source>J. Second Lang. Writ</source>
          .
          <volume>31</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>25</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>42</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref34">
        <mixed-citation>
          34.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mao</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lai</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Luo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Liu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Du</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zhou</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Ma, J.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bonaiuto</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bonaiuto</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2020</year>
          .
          <article-title>Apple or Huawei: Understanding Flow, Brand Image, Brand Identity</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Brand Personality and Purchase Intention of Smartphone. Sustainability</source>
          <volume>12</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>3391</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref35">
        <mixed-citation>
          35.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Parguel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lunardo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Benoit-Moreau</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <article-title>Sustainability of the sharing economy in question: When second-hand peer-to-peer platforms stimulate indulgent consumption</article-title>
          .
          <source>Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change</source>
          <volume>125</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>48</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>57</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref36">
        <mixed-citation>
          36.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Philip</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ozanne</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ballantine</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2015</year>
          .
          <article-title>Examining temporary disposition and acquisition in peer-to-peer renting</article-title>
          .
          <source>J. Mark. Manag</source>
          .
          <volume>31</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>1310</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1332</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref37">
        <mixed-citation>
          37.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Reast</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2005</year>
          .
          <article-title>Brand trust and brand extension acceptance: the relationship</article-title>
          .
          <source>J. Prod. Brand Manag.</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref38">
        <mixed-citation>
          38. Roma,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Aloini</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>D.</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2019</year>
          .
          <article-title>How does brand-related user-generated content differ across social media? Evidence reloaded</article-title>
          .
          <source>J. Bus. Res</source>
          .
          <volume>96</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>322</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>339</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref39">
        <mixed-citation>
          39.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sridhar</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Srinivasan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2012</year>
          .
          <article-title>Social influence effects in online product ratings</article-title>
          .
          <source>J. Mark</source>
          .
          <volume>76</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>70</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>88</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref40">
        <mixed-citation>
          40.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sweeney</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Soutar</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mazzarol</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2012</year>
          .
          <article-title>Word of mouth: measuring the power of individual messages</article-title>
          .
          <source>Eur. J. Mark.</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref41">
        <mixed-citation>
          41.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tao</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2011</year>
          .
          <article-title>An empirical examination of initial trust in mobile banking</article-title>
          .
          <source>Internet Res</source>
          .
          <volume>21</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>527</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>540</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241111176353
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref42">
        <mixed-citation>
          42.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Thomas</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2019</year>
          .
          <article-title>CITIZEN JOURNALISM AND CIVIL SOCIETY: ATTITUDES OF MAINSTREAM JOURNALISTS TO USER-GENERATED CONTENT (UGC) ON SOCIAL MEDIA</article-title>
          .
          <source>J. East. Caribb. Stud</source>
          .
          <volume>44</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>115</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>155</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref43">
        <mixed-citation>
          43.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Torlak</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ozkara</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tiltay</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cengiz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dulger</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2014</year>
          .
          <article-title>The effect of electronic word of mouth on brand image and purchase intention: An application concerning cell phone brands for youth consumers in Turkey</article-title>
          .
          <source>J. Mark. Dev. Compet</source>
          .
          <volume>8</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>61</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref44">
        <mixed-citation>
          44.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tseng</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.-C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.-L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2019</year>
          .
          <article-title>When the Sharing Economy Meets Established Institutions: Uber and Airbnb in Taiwan</article-title>
          .
          <source>IEEE Trans. Eng</source>
          . Manag.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref45">
        <mixed-citation>
          45.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tussyadiah</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>Factors of satisfaction and intention to use peer-to-peer accommodation</article-title>
          .
          <source>Int. J. Hosp. Manag</source>
          .
          <volume>55</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>70</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>80</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <volume>03</volume>
          .005
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref46">
        <mixed-citation>
          46.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vahdati</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Mousavi</given-names>
            <surname>Nejad</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>S.H.</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>BRAND PERSONALITY TOWARD CUSTOMER PURCHASE INTENTION: THE INTERMEDIATE ROLE OF ELECTRONIC WORD-OF-MOUTH AND BRAND EQUITY</article-title>
          .
          <source>Asian Acad. Manag. J</source>
          .
          <volume>21</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref47">
        <mixed-citation>
          47.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nilashi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Abumalloh</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Alghamdi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Minaei-Bidgoli</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Alsulami</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Thanoon</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Asadi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Samad</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          ).
          <article-title>What is the impact of service quality on customers' satisfaction during COVID-19 outbreak? New findings from online reviews analysis</article-title>
          .
          <source>Telematics and Informatics</source>
          ,
          <volume>64</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>101693</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref48">
        <mixed-citation>
          48.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nilashi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Abumalloh</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Minaei-Bidgoli</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zogaan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Alhargan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mohd</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Azhar</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S. N. F. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Asadi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Samad</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2022</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Revealing travellers' satisfaction during COVID-19 outbreak: moderating role of service quality</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services</source>
          ,
          <volume>64</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>102783</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref49">
        <mixed-citation>
          49.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nicolau</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <article-title>Price determinants of sharing economy based accommodation rental: A study of listings from 33 cities on Airbnb. com</article-title>
          .
          <source>Int. J. Hosp. Manag</source>
          .
          <volume>62</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>120</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>131</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref50">
        <mixed-citation>
          50.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2019</year>
          .
          <article-title>Understanding consumers' willingness to use ride-sharing services: The roles of perceived value and perceived risk</article-title>
          .
          <source>Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol</source>
          .
          <volume>105</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>504</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>519</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref51">
        <mixed-citation>
          51.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Winterhalter</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wecht</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Krieg</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2015</year>
          .
          <article-title>Keeping reins on the sharing economy: strategies and business models for incumbents</article-title>
          .
          <source>Mark. Rev. St. Gall</source>
          .
          <volume>32</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>32</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>39</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref52">
        <mixed-citation>
          52.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wosskow</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2014</year>
          .
          <article-title>Unlocking the sharing economy: An independent review</article-title>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref53">
        <mixed-citation>
          53.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yap</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Soetarto</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sweeney</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2013</year>
          .
          <article-title>The relationship between electronic wordof-mouth motivations and message characteristics: The sender's perspective</article-title>
          . Australas. Mark. J.
          <volume>21</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>66</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>74</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.
          <year>2012</year>
          .
          <volume>09</volume>
          .001
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref54">
        <mixed-citation>
          54.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ha</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <article-title>User acceptance of media tablets: An empirical examination of perceived value</article-title>
          .
          <source>Telemat. Informatics</source>
          <volume>34</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>206</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>223</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.
          <year>2015</year>
          .
          <volume>11</volume>
          .004
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>