<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Ratio Test for Changes Heavy Index Based on M- Estimation under the Background of Big Data</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Meiting Liu</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Hao Jin</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Yangyi Cheng</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Zini Wang</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of Sciences, Xi'an University of Science and Technology</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Xi'an, Shaanxi</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="CN">China</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>163</fpage>
      <lpage>167</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>With the development of the big data age, the demand of modern emerging disciplines for the fine quantitative tail characteristics of financial data analysis is constantly developing, so the research method of tail index change point in the thick tail sequence is particularly important. In this paper, we extend the Ratio statistic proposed by Kim to the test of change point of tail index in infinite variance observations. The null distribution of the statistic and its consistency under alternative hypothesis were obtained. Prior with the least squares estimation method used in previous articles,we used robust M estimation to estimate unknown parameter ,making parameter estimation in the model more accurate.The Monte Carlo numerical simulation shows that our test works well.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;Heavy-Tailed</kwd>
        <kwd>Tail Index</kwd>
        <kwd>Ratio Test</kwd>
        <kwd>M-Estimation</kwd>
        <kwd>Big Data</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>In the age of big data, pre-detecting structural changes allows us to better interpret data, predict data
more accurately and avoid risk. Therefore, the study of structural change points has attracted wide
attention from many scholars. Tail index change point is one of the core contens of change point research,
which is widely used in pratical life. Such as finance, hydrology, communication engineering and other
fields. Several tail index change-point tests have been proposed in the past decade. Quintos, Fan, and
Phllips [1] employed three tests to verify tail index change-points in independent samples and ARCH
models. And later Kim and Lee [4] studied the tail index change-point test based on autoregressive
residuals.</p>
      <p>Reasonable estimates of the parameters in the models are also momentous. The least squares
estimation is the most commonly used point estimation method in parameter estimation, but data with
anomalies or strong influence points are often encountered in pratical problems, while the least-squares
estimator is sensitive to the emergence of outliers in the data. Therefore, in order to eliminate or reduce
the effect of outliers, The estimator is required to have a robustness. While M estimation is a commonly
used class of estimates in current robust estimation methods, and there have been a series of extensive
studies on M estimation. Richard, Keight and Liu [10] used M estimation to study the estimates of
autogressive parameters in heavy-tailed sequences, and later Keith Knight proposed the limit theory
of M estimation in heavy-tailed sequences.</p>
      <p>In this paper, We employ robust M estimation to estimate unkown parameters in the model and
obtain the asymptotic behaviour of the estimator. To define the test statistic, we cite the test statistic
based on detecting change point in the persistence by Kim[8] to test the change point of heavy index.</p>
      <p>This paper is arranged as follows. Section 2 we show the model and assumptions. Section 3 represent
test statistic and asymptotic distribution. Section 4 the Monte Carlo simulation is made.Section 5
summarize this paper.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Model and Assumption</title>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>Our model is presented as follows:</title>
        <p>
          y = u + ε , t = 1,2, ⋯ T
( )ρ = ψ(. );Eψ (η ) = 0 ;E(|ψ(η )|
( )ψ (. ) is Lipschitz continuous; 0 &lt; Eψ
Lemma.1. if the assumption (A ) holds, then
(η ) &lt; ∞ .
Moreover, U (r) =r/ U (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
          ).
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>Remark 1. Specific reference Phillips [13].</title>
        <sec id="sec-2-2-1">
          <title>Lemma.2. If assumption (A ) − (A ) holds, then</title>
          <p>T/ (μ − μ) → ⋅ (() ( )) , t = 1,2, ⋯ [Tτ]</p>
          <p>T/ (μ − μ) → ( ()())⋅ ( ( )) , t = [Tτ] + 1, [Tτ] + 2, ⋯ T
where μ , μ represents M estimation based on respectively y , y , ⋯ y[ ] and y[]</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-2-2">
          <title>B(τ) is Brownian motion.</title>
          <p>Proof of Lemma.2.</p>
          <p>
            We consider estimates μ defined by minimizing ∑ ρ(y − μ). Define the process
Z (v) = ∑[ ]
ρ
ε + vT
− ρ(ε ) ,
(
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
            )
(
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
            )
(
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
            )
(
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
            )
(
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
            )
, ⋯ , y .
          </p>
          <p>and note that v which minimizes Z is simply T (μ − μ).Then we using the Taylor series
expansion of each summand of Z around v = 0,we get</p>
          <p>Z (v) = T
v ∑[ ] ψ(ε ) + T
v ∑[ ] ψ (ε∗),
where ε∗ lies between ε and ε + T</p>
          <p>v.Using the fact that ψ is Lipschitz-continuous|ψ (ε ) −
ψ (ε∗)| ≤ K T
v , and reference Keith Knight[11],we can get</p>
          <p>[ ]
T
∑[ ] ψ(η ) → B(τ),T
∑[ ]ψ (ε ) − E(ψ (ε ))
Thus, the finite dimensional distributions of Z (⋅)converge weakly to those of Z(⋅),
where Z(v) = vB(τ) + v τE(ψ (ε )),let Z (v) = 0,we get v = T/ (μ − μ) →
In the same way, t = Tτ + 1, Tτ + 2, ⋯ T, v = T/ (μ − μ) →
specific reference Keith Knight[10].</p>
          <p>Now,we take into account the following null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis:
(
()()
)⋅ ( ( ))
.</p>
          <p>()
⋅ ( ( ))</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-2-3">
          <title>H :k is constant</title>
          <p>H :k = k I{
∗} + k I{
∗}</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Test Statistic and Asymptotic Distribution</title>
      <p>We consider the Ratio statistic presented by Kim:
Ξ (τ) =
([
where ε, and ε, represents M estimation residuals based on respectively y , y , ⋯ y[ ] and
, ⋯ , y .According to ratio statistic, a Maximum Chow-type test is proposed
Theorem 3.1 Suppose the assumption A − A</p>
      <p>
        holds, then under the null hypothesis,
Ξ = maxΞ (τ), T ∈ (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">0,1</xref>
        )
      </p>
      <p>∈
Ξ (τ) ⇒
(
)
(
( )
)
And Ξ ⇒ Ξ (τ),G (r) = U (r),r ∈ (0, τ);G (r − τ) = U (r) − U (τ),r ∈ (τ, 1)
Proof of Theorem 3.1
According to Lemma.1, Lemma.2, let t = Tr ,we have</p>
      <p>(ε − (u − u)) ⇒ U (r) = G (r),so
a ∑ ε, = a ∑
[τT] ∑[ ] ∑ ε, ⇒ τ G (r).</p>
      <p>Similarly, a ∑ ε, = a ∑ (ε − (u − u)) ⇒ U (r − τ) = G (r − τ).
Finally, we get the limit distribution of the statistics unde the null hypothesis
Ξ (τ) ⇒
(1 − τ)</p>
      <p>G (r − τ) dr
τ G (r) dr</p>
      <p>
        Theorem 3.2 If assumption A − A holds, and τ∗ is the break time, then under the alternative
hypothesis, (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        )k &gt; k and 0 &lt; τ ≤ τ∗,we have
Ξ = maxΞ (τ) = O (
∈
), As T → ∞,Ξ → ∞
For τ∗ &lt; τ &lt; 1,we have Ξ = maxΞ (τ) = O (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ).
      </p>
      <p>
        ∈
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ) k
      </p>
      <p>&lt; k and 0 &lt;  ≤  ∗, we have Ξ
For τ∗ &lt; τ &lt; 1，we have
= maxΞ
∈</p>
      <p>
        (τ) = O (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ),
Ξ = maxΞ (τ) = O (
      </p>
      <p>∈</p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>L(T),L is slowly function.</title>
        <p>
          a = T/ L(T),a = T/
Proof of Theorem 3.2
We first consider the case (i) k &gt; k ,0 &lt; τ ≤ τ∗,similar to Proof of Theorem 3.1, the denominator
) → ∞,As T → ∞,Ξ
→ ∞
(
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
          )
is [τT]
        </p>
        <p>∑[ ] ∑
([1 − τ]T)</p>
        <p>ε,
[ ∗ ]
∑ [ ]
= O (a ).The numerator is
When k &gt; k ,Ξ (τ) = O (</p>
        <p>) → ∞.The case τ∗ &lt; τ &lt; 1,
the denominator is [τT]
and the numerator is ([1 − τ]T)
∑[ ∗ ] ∑</p>
        <p>ε,</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>Above all,Ξ</title>
        <p>= maxΞ (τ) = O (
∈
).As T → ∞, Ξ
→ ∞.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>Then the case (ii) k &lt; k ,similar to the case (i), The proof is omitted . Theorem 3.3 If Aussmption A</title>
        <p>
          − A
holds, then under the alternative hypothesis, if k
≠ k ,we
Ξ
∗ = max Ξ , Ξ
, As T → ∞, Ξ
∗ → ∞.
(
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
          )
have
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4.Monte Carlo simulation</title>
      <p>This section we use the Monte Carlo numerical simulation method to verify the effectiveness of our
Ratio test.We obtain the empirical level value and empirical potential function value . Consider the
following
data
generation
process: 
=  + 
, t = 1,2, … T . The sample size is</p>
      <p>T =
distributed, so we only give the critical value of the original statistic.
200，500，1000. heavy-tailed index {κ = 0.6, 0.8,0.9 ,1.6,1.8,1.9} .The test was repeated 2000
times and significance level α = 0.05.The original statistic and the inverted statistic are identically
0.9 → 0.8
0.9 → 0.6
0.8 → 0.6
0.8 → 0.5
0.9 → 0.8
0.9 → 0.6
0.8 → 0.6
0.8 → 0.5
0.9 → 0.8
0.9 → 0.6
0.8 → 0.6
0.8 → 0.5
 = 0.3</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5.Conclusions</title>
      <p>In this paper, we investigate the heavy index change point in thick tail sequence, and this theme is
closely related to the big data setting and financial market. we adopt M-estimate to estimate unknow
parameter, and absort to the statistic proposed by Kim, obtained the limit distribution of the statistics
unde the null hypothesis and its consistency under alternative hypothesis.Numerical simulations verify
that our statistics work very well.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>6.References</title>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Quintos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Phillips</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P. C. B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2001</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Structural change tests in tail behaviour and the Asian crisis</article-title>
          .
          <source>Review of Economic Studies</source>
          ,
          <volume>68</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>633</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>663</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>[2] Relevant parameter changes in structural break models</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Econometrics</source>
          ,
          <year>2020</year>
          ,
          <volume>217</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>46</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>78</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Peluso</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Chib</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>and</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Mira</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2019</year>
          . “
          <article-title>Semiparametric Multivariate and Multiple Change-point Modelling</article-title>
          .”
          <source>Bayesian Analysis</source>
          <volume>14</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>727</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>751</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kim</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          )
          <article-title>Change point test of tail index for autoregressive processes</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of the Korean Statistical Society</source>
          <volume>41</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>305</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>312</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Page</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Continue inspection schemes</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Biometrika</source>
          ,
          <year>1954</year>
          ,
          <volume>42</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>100</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>114</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. K.</given-names>
            <surname>Gupta. Parametric Statistical Change Point Analysis</surname>
          </string-name>
          . Boston: Birkha-user,
          <year>2000</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kim</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Detection of change in persistence of a linear time series</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Econometrics</source>
          ,
          <year>2000</year>
          ,
          <volume>95</volume>
          :
          <fpage>97</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>116</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kim</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Corrigendum to“Detection of change in persistence of a linear time series”</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Econometrics</source>
          ,
          <year>2002</year>
          ,
          <volume>109</volume>
          :
          <fpage>389</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>392</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <surname>GAMAGE</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>RAMADHA D. PIYADI</surname>
          </string-name>
          , NING, WEI.
          <article-title>Empirical likelihood for change point detection in autoregressive models</article-title>
          .
          <source>2021</source>
          (
          <volume>1</volume>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Davis</surname>
            <given-names>Richard A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Knight</surname>
            <given-names>Keith</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Liu</given-names>
            <surname>Jian</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>M-estimation for autoregressions with infinite variance</article-title>
          .
          <source>Stochastic Processes and their Applications</source>
          ,
          <year>1992</year>
          ,
          <volume>40</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ):
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Keith</given-names>
            <surname>Knight</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Limit Theory for M-Estimates in an Integrated Infinite Variance Process</article-title>
          .
          <source>Econometric Theory</source>
          ,
          <year>1991</year>
          ,
          <volume>7</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ):
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Maryam</surname>
            <given-names>Sohrabi</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Mahmoud</given-names>
            <surname>Zarepour</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Asymptotic theory for M-estimates in unstable AR( p ) processes with infinite variance innovations</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference</source>
          ,
          <year>2019</year>
          ,
          <volume>198</volume>
          :
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Phillips P C B 1990 Econometrica Theory</surname>
          </string-name>
          6
          <fpage>44</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>62</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>