Pavel Shvaiko 0 Trentino Digitale SpA 0 Italy 0 Oktie Hassanzadeh 0 IBM Research 0 Ca´ssia Trojahn 0 France 0 Alsayed Algergawy 0 Jena University 0 Germany Manuel Atencia 0 Universidad de Ma´laga 0 Spain Jiaoyan Chen 0 University of Oxford 0 UK Je´ro 0 me David 0 University Grenoble Alpes 0 INRIA 0 France Gayo Diallo 0 University of Bordeaux 0 France Daniel Faria 0 INESC-ID 0 University of Lisbon 0 Portugal Alo Ferrara 0 University of Milan 0 Italy Marko Gulic´ 0 University of Rijeka 0 Croatia Wei Hu 0 Nanjing University 0 China Ryutaro Ichise 0 National Institute of Informatics 0 Japan Antoine Isaac 0 Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam 0 Europeana 0 Netherlands Naouel Karam 0 Fraunhofer 0 Germany Prodromos Kolyvakis 0 Switzerland Patrick Lambrix 0 Linko¨pings Universitet 0 Sweden Oliver Lehmberg 0 University of Mannheim 0 Germany Fiona McNeill 0 University of Edinburgh 0 UK Majeed Mohammadi 0 Eindhoven University of Technology 0 Netherlands 0 Ernesto Jime ́nez-Ruiz , City , University of London, UK & SIRIUS, University of Oslo , Norway 2022

Ontology matching1 is a key interoperability enabler for the semantic web, as well as a useful tactic in some classical data integration tasks dealing with the semantic heterogeneity problem. It takes ontologies as input and determines as output an alignment, that is, a set of correspondences between the semantically related entities of those ontologies. These correspondences can be used for various tasks, such as ontology merging, data interlinking, query answering or navigation over knowledge graphs. Thus, matching ontologies enables the knowledge and data expressed with the matched ontologies to interoperate.

 -

Acknowledgments. We thank all members of the program committee, authors and local organizers for their e€orts. We appreciate support from Trentino Digitale3, the EU SEALS (Semantic Evaluation at Large Scale) project4, the EU HOBBIT (Holistic Benchmarking of Big Linked Data) project5, the MELT (Matching EvaLuation Toolkit) project6, the Pistoia Alliance Ontologies Mapping project7, IBM Research8 and SIRIUS Centre for Scalable Data Access9.

 Pavel Shvaiko

Je´ro^me Euzenat Ernesto Jime´nez-Ruiz Oktie Hassanzadeh Ca´ssia Trojahn December 2022 3www.trentinodigitale.it 4www.seals-project.eu 5https://project-hobbit.eu/challenges/om2020/ 6https://dwslab.github.io/melt/ 7www.pistoiaalliance.org/projects/current-projects/ontologies-mapping 8research.ibm.com 9https://www.mn.uio.no/sirius/

Organizing Committee Je´ro^me Euzenat,

INRIA & University Grenoble Alpes, France

 Program Committee Hoa Ngo, CSIRO, Australia George Papadakis, University of Athens, Greece Henry Rosales-Me´ndez, University of Chile, Chile

Booma Sowkarthiga, Microso†, USA Kavitha Srinivas, IBM, USA Ludger van Elst, DFKI, Germany Xingsi Xue, Fujian University of Technology, China Ondrˇej Zamazal, Prague University of Economics, Czech Republic Songmao Zhang, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Lu Zhou, TigerGraph, USA

The impact of imbalanced class distribution on knowledge graphs matching

Omaima Fallatah, Ziqi Zhang, Frank Hopfgartner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

 Exploring Wasserstein distance across concept embeddings for ontology matching

Yuan An, Alex Kalinowski, Jane Greenberg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

 LamAPI: a comprehensive tool for string-based entity retrieval with type-base lters

Roberto Avogadro, Marco Cremaschi, Fabio D’Adda, Flavio De Paoli, Matteo Palmonari . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

 BiodivTab: semantic table annotation benchmark construction, analysis, and new additions

Nora Abdelmageed, Sirko Schindler, Birgitta Ko¨nig-Ries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

 An eye on representation learning in ontology matching

Guilherme Sousa, Rinaldo Lima, Ca´ssia Trojahn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49

 A simple standard for ontological mappings 2022: updates of data model and outlook

Nicolas Matentzoglu, Joe Flack, John Graybeal, Nomi L. Harris, Harshad B. Hegde, Charles T. Hoyt, Hyeongsik Kim, Sabrina Toro, Nicole Vasilevsky, Christopher J. Mungall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 Short Technical Papers

 Too big to match: a strategy around matching tasks for large taxonomies

Alsayed Algergawy, Naouel Karam, Amir Laadhar, Franck Michel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67

 Self-learning ontological concept representation for searching and matching tasks

Duy-Hoa Ngo, Bevan Koopman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73

 Matching pharmacogenomic knowledge: particularities, results, and perspectives

Pierre Monnin, Adrien Coulet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 OAEI Papers

 Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2022

Mina Abd Nikooie Pour, Alsayed Algergawy, Patrice Buche, Leyla J. Castro, Jiaoyan Chen, Hang Dong, Omaima Fallatah, Daniel Faria, Irini Fundulaki, Sven Hertling, Yuan He, Ian Horrocks, Martin Huschka, Liliana Ibanescu, Ernesto Jime´nez-Ruiz, Naouel Karam, Amir Laadhar, Patrick Lambrix, Huanyu Li, Ying Li, Franck Michel, Engy Nasr, Heiko Paulheim, Catia Pesquita, Tzanina Saveta, Pavel Shvaiko, Ca´ssia Trojahn, Chantelle Verhey, Mingfang Wu, Beyza Yaman, Ondrˇej Zamazal, Lu Zhou . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84

 ALIN results for OAEI 2022

Jomar da Silva, Kate Revoredo, Fernanda Baia˜ o, Cabral Lima . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129

 A-LIOn - alignment learning through inconsistency negatives of the aligned ontologies

Sarah M. Alghamdi, Fernando Zhapa-Camacho, Robert Hoehndorf . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137

 AMD results for OAEI 2022

Zhu Wang . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145

 ATBox results for OAEI 2022

Sven Hertling, Heiko Paulheim . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153

 Cross-lingual ontology matching with CIDER-LM: results for OAEI 2022

Javier Vela, Jorge Gracia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158

 DLinker results for OAEI 2022

Bill Happi, Ge´raud Fokou Pelap, Danai Symeonidou, Pierre Larmande . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166

 GraphMatcher: a graph representation learning approach for ontology matching

Seka Efeoglu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174

 KGMatcher+ results for OAEI 2022

Omaima Fallatah, Ziqi Zhang, Frank Hopfgartner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181

 LogMap family participation in the OAEI 2022

Ernesto Jime´nez-Ruiz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188

 LSMatch and LSMatch-multilingual results for OAEI 2022

Abhisek Sharma, Archana Patel, Sarika Jain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191

 Matcha and Matcha-DL results for OAEI 2022

Daniel Faria, Marta Contreiras Silva, Pedro Cotovio, Patr´ıcia Euge´nio, Catia Pesquita . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197

 SEBMatcher results for OAEI 2022

Francis Gosselin, Amal Zouaq . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202

 TOMATO: results of the 2022 OAEI evaluation campaign

Philippe Roussille, Olivier Teste . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210

 WomboCombo results for OAEI 2022

Peter Kardos, Zsolt Sza´nto´, Richa´rd Farkas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216

 What should be the minimum requirements for making FAIR ontology alignments?

Ca´ssia Trojahn, Nicolas Matentzoglu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220

 Towards a unied metadata model for semantic and data mappings

Sarah Alzahrani, Declan O’Sullivan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223

 Meta2KG: transforming metadata to knowledge graphs

Nora Abdelmageed, Birgitta Ko¨nig-Ries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226 Multifarm11 - extending the multifarm benchmark for Hindi language Abhisek Sharma, Sarika Jain, Ca´ssia Trojahn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229