<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>within CoyPu</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Agnés Masip Gómez</string-name>
          <email>Agnes.MasipGomez@infineon.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Martin Heß</string-name>
          <email>martin@infai.org</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Philipp Ulrich</string-name>
          <email>Philipp.Ulrich@infineon.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Albert Eckert</string-name>
          <email>albert.eckert@siemens.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Yushan Liu</string-name>
          <email>yushan.liu@siemens.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Theodor Isinger</string-name>
          <email>theodor.isinger@siemens.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Michael Martin</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Infineon Technologies AG</institution>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Institut für Angewandte Informatik</institution>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Siemens AG</institution>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2022</year>
      </pub-date>
      <abstract>
        <p>Supply chain resilience and transparency are important for the ability of companies to react flexibly to the changing conditions of the environment and the market, especially in crisis situations. Events such as pandemics or economic crises can lead to sharp changes in demand or a halt in production as well as bottlenecks along supply chains. In the project CoyPu, which tackles the complex economic challenges in crisis situations by integrating heterogeneous data and solutions into an intelligent platform, we put particular focus on the two use cases demand forecasting and resilient production. An accurate demand forecast is important for companies to accurately plan production. This need is amplified in supply chains containing semiconductors, since long production times limit flexibility. Especially in times of disruptions tactical demand forecasts and the Bullwhip Efect, which amplifies demand along the supply chains, further complicate demand forecasting. This requires alternative demand forecasting approaches to tackle the before-mentioned issues. To meet the forecasted demand, smooth production processes are necessary, which rely on parameters such as precise predictions of material availability to optimize the production start time. Due to intransparent supply chains, which lack information such as subsuppliers or specific source locations, it is challenging to obtain accurate predictions and find the best alternative solution in case of adverse events. To address these issues on both the demand and supply side, CoyPu aims at enabling high-quality and insights into economic trends and forecasts, based on cognitive modeling of data within a system of networked knowledge graphs and configurable artificial intelligence analysis tools. This paper highlights major challenges on the demand and supply side and possible solutions to achieve an optimized demand forecasting and a more resilient production.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>production</kwd>
        <kwd>Supply chain</kwd>
        <kwd>crisis prediction</kwd>
        <kwd>knowledge graphs</kwd>
        <kwd>artificial intelligence</kwd>
        <kwd>demand forecasting</kwd>
        <kwd>resilient</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Resilience and planning security of complex global supply chains and production are generally
important but especially in crisis situations in order to be able to react flexibly and agilely to the
changing conditions of the environment and the market. Crisis situations such as pandemics
or economic crises can lead to sharp changes in demand or a halt in production as well as
bottlenecks along supply chains.</p>
      <p>The CoyPu project addresses the complex economic challenges in crisis situations with an
intelligent platform for integrating, structuring, analyzing, and evaluating heterogeneous data
from economic value networks as well as the industry environment and social context. Based
on cognitive modeling of data within a promoted system of networked knowledge graphs and
lfexibly configurable AI analysis tools, the CoyPu platform enables high-quality and insights
into economic facts, trends, impact relationships, and forecasts. The crisis-relevant questions
that can be answered in this way can concern individual value networks or concrete value
chains, focus on diferent regions, industries or company sizes, or be located at the overall
economic level. To avoid supply bottlenecks, it is therefore necessary to identify production-,
system- and crisis-relevant goods and their supply routes in advance. The project develops
the technical prerequisites for the preventive analysis of crisis and disaster situations and thus
enables decisions to increase the resilience of supply networks.</p>
      <p>Two complementary perspectives are used as a basis for the development of the solution. On
the one hand, (a) company-level resilience and crisis efects are focused on for concrete value
chains, and on the other hand, (b) cross-value-chain efects on the level of markets, industry
ecosystems, regions, or the overall economy are considered. This paper highlights the challenges
and possible solutions by working on the perspective (a). The two use cases, which will be
described in more detail in the following, are:
• Optimization of demand forecasting: increasing planning flexibility and reliability.
• Resilient production: risk identification and mitigation with regard to critical parameters,
e. g., production and storage sites, production processes, and supply chains.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Use Cases Overview</title>
      <p>In order to achieve resilience in the face of disruptions and events, CoyPu will facilitate a
knowledge graph-based approach that aims to optimize demand forecasting as well as
production. Siemens leads the use case about resilient production, focusing on the supplier side
and disruptions impacting relevant materials. On the demand side, Infineon aims to improve
existing demand forecasting by connecting relevant external data concerning demand drivers.
Both use cases will use ontologies as the basis to model supply chains as well as events and
trends and integrate data into knowledge graphs to achieve the use case goals. However,
challenges regarding the Bullwhip Efect or supply chain transparency complicate the use cases
substantially. The following sections introduce the demand forecasting and resilient production
use case. Each use case outlines major challenges, highlights background information, and
proposes potential solutions.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Optimization of Demand Forecasting</title>
      <p>
        Infineon’s use case concerns optimized demand forecasting. There are unique challenges
on the demand side need to be targeted in the case of the semiconductor industry. Due to
the high level of sophistication and complexity that is inherent to semiconductor devices,
production is time consuming and costly. Processes include thousands of steps, which, due
to the high levels of precision required by the miniature scale of the product as well as its
layered architecture, have to be performed in sequence and often repeated multiple times [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ].
This leads to production cycles routinely exceeding four to six months [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. High costs of both
operating and expanding manufacturing facilities, due to the requirements for equipment and
manufacturing environments, pose additional challenges. Constructing a new facility involves
high costs and sites have to operate in 24/7, year-round production in order to remain profitable,
with facilities constantly running near or at maximum capacity [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ]. Forecasting is therefore
essential to the industry, as ramping up production or increasing capacity on short notice is
challenging faced with the mentioned characteristics of the industry. Challenges arise here in
the domain of forecast accuracy, which depends on receiving representative demand pictures
from customers for better planning of production. In addition to the before-mentioned industry
characteristics, tactical demands in forecasting and ordering as well as the Bullwhip Efect as
major challenges need to be taken into account for the use case.
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>3.1. Tactical Demand</title>
        <p>
          One of the greater challenges in the domain of demand forecasting stems from the
communication of tactical demand numbers by customers. Instead of the true demand, companies
tend to report inflated, tactical demand data to ensure that their orders will be fulfilled. This
leads to a less optimal production planning and constitutes a significant problem particularly
in times of disruptions. This behavior is incentivized by the way how ordering systems in
times of scarcity are set up. When inventories are low, products will be distributed through
allocation, which is done via manually assisted distribution to customers. Typically, only a
certain percentage of any given order can be fulfilled in this scenario. Thus, communicating a
number that exceeds the originally required amount two- or three fold ensures that orders will
be fulfilled completely [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
          ]. Psychological efects and resulting behavioral order mechanisms
related to the anticipation of scarcity are further contributors to inflated orders. When faced
with the possibility of an emerging shortage, buyers tend to respond in a way that fixates on loss
aversion while prioritizing risk aversion second and possible gains last. They will often exhibit
probability weighing behavior, in which the likelihood of a shortage is misinterpreted and often
overestimated. This correlates closely with the concept of prospect theory, which suggests
that risk will typically be sought out to avoid losses when faced with a risky decision where
they seem likely, while risk will conversely be avoided when gains appear more probable [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
          ].
Research suggests that as a result, orders may come within the range of up to 2500% of baseline
demand when customers anticipate a shortage [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
          ]. These inflated demand numbers further
complicates demand forecasting and subsequently production planning.
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>3.2. Bullwhip Efect</title>
        <p>
          Another major challenge afecting demand forecasting is the Bullwhip Efect. Companies
that are situated in the upper echelons of a supply chain and therefore separated from end
customers by multiple levels are impacted substantially by demand miscommunications since
the demand signal is amplified by the Bullwhip Efect. This is a well-known phenomenon,
in which demand signals become distorted as they travel up a supply chain. As the signal
progresses upstream, it intensifies at every stage to the point where the demand picture received
in the upper echelons no longer reflects reality [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
          ]. The Bullwhip efect, as seen in figure 1, has
been observed extensively and has again played a major role in the (as of the writing of this
paper) ongoing global chip shortage. Demand miscommunication constitutes a key contributing
factor for the development and facilitation of the Bullwhip Efect in semiconductor supply
chains and coincides with additional challenges. These consist mainly of characteristics of the
semiconductor industry conflicting with operational practices throughout other supply chain
levels. In the automotive industry in particular, it is commonplace to rely on methods such as
just-in-time, the pull principle, or reach steering for inventory management [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
          ]. These practices
may work well within the lower tiers of the supply chain but can create issues upstream, as they
lead to deviations from forecasts that may not be able to be fulfilled given the aforementioned
limited flexibility of semiconductor manufacturing based on the industry characteristics. This
leads to additional demand uncertainty, which culminates in an inaccurate demand picture
and facilitation of the Bullwhip Efect. With respect to machine learning, this poses further
issues, as demand data subsequently includes bias of the tactical demands and noise which is
amplified by the Bullwhip Efect. Any machine learning model trained on those data sets will
therefore learn the same bias and noise patterns and will be inaccurate at demand prediction in
the face of cancelled orders. As a result, companies may produce the wrong products at the
wrong volumes and are confronted with high inventory costs.
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>3.3. Solution Approach</title>
        <p>To improve forecast accuracy in the context of semiconductor manufacturing, a referencing
system of customer demand with other data could present an opportunity to circumvent some of
the challenges posed by information asymmetries. External information like market or customer
circumstances can be independent of tactical demand information and amplifications by the
Bullwhip Efect and act as a valuable indicator for future demand. Therefore, in addition to
order and forecast information, the demand forecasting use case includes independent external
and internal context information to improve forecasting performance.</p>
        <p>
          This is addressed by the architecture seen in Figure 2 within CoyPu. External data augments
demand forecasts that are solely based on customer forecasts, which includes organization,
market and industry information. Additional internal information serves as further context
information in the forecasting. Both, external and internal data sources are the input for the
demand forecasting system. Subsequently, data is prepared and transformed for the generation
of a CoyPu knowledge graph. The added value of such an approach stems from a viewpoint that
integrates and connects data in networks rather than including data silos. A graph structure
allows to capture the highly connected internal and external data sources. Ontologies provide
the semantic basis for the semantic data integration and a common vocabulary. These include
existing models like the Digital Reference [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
          ], a supply chain ontology for semiconductor
supply chains as well as generic supply chains. The ontology enables humans to understand the
domain of forecast-relevant information as well as relationships between products, customers,
and demand drivers. At the same time, the resulting knowledge graph is usable by machines
and can be used for visualizations, analytics, and the CoyPu-based demand forecasting. Using
semantic artificial intelligence methods, a data-driven demand forecast will be implemented
and iteratively compared to benchmark demand forecasting methods to evaluate the results.
With the knowledge graph-based approach, an increased transparency along supply chains
can be achieved. Furthermore the parallel stream is independent of tactical demands and the
Bullwhip Efect. By including trends and events from various sources, the overall goal of better
understandability and prediction of demand is enabled.
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Resilient Production</title>
      <p>
        Production processes depend on numerous global aspects, such as multiple production locations,
multiple parts storages, and global provider networks. A well-established and complex supply
network might be disturbed or even broken by unpredictable events. Examples of such events
are pandemics, embargos, environmental disasters, military conflicts, and economic crises.
Any of these events may cause local production bottlenecks or even production stops, which
will afect all subsequent processes. Schroeder et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ] studied the efects of the Covid-19
pandemic on manufacturing and trading companies and found that 64% of these companies
experienced negative efects in the procurement area while supply chain risk management was
often only available on a small scale or even not available at all. Especially companies that rely
on just-in-time production depending on one single supplier face enormous challenges if the
supply chain is disrupted [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Within CoyPu, Siemens works on resilient production with the goal to identify risks with
regard to critical parameters in, e. g., supply chains and production processes, and to demonstrate
how early risk evaluations could enable counter measures and therefore enhance production
resilience.</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>4.1. Supply Chain Transparency</title>
        <p>
          In a supply chain network, each participant has only limited information in each direction.
While companies usually know their direct (tier-1) customers and suppliers, almost 80% of the
companies cannot name the number of their subsuppliers (tier-2 or tier-n suppliers) [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
          ]. Going
further in each direction continuously decreases the transparency, also due to the unwillingness
of companies to share data with their suppliers and customers, which could be considered a
competitive disadvantage and result in a negative impact for the own business. Furthermore,
supply chain data generally sufer from incompleteness, e.g., source locations of materials
cannot be easily derived from sales ofice locations. Starting with the direct suppliers, tracking
preceding steps within the supply chain, even back to raw material production, would be helpful
to get a more reliable picture of the risks, critical paths, and bottlenecks in the supply network.
Transportation routes of product parts as well as stock supply in material warehouses should
be considered as well and integrated in the risk management process.
        </p>
        <p>
          Decisions in supply chain risk management are made based on internal data, estimations
about uncertain information in the supply chain, and publicly available knowledge. In a survey,
at least 75% of the companies see need for improvement considering the transparency in the
supply chain and methods for risk identification [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
          ]. Creating more transparency in the
supply chain is an active research topic [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
          ], where successful implementations can lead to
better informed decision making processes, more flexible risk mitigation strategies, and more
resilience in the production.
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>4.2. Production Start Time Optimization</title>
        <p>Risks in the supply and value chain at the level of the individual productions mostly have an
efect on time. The risk either afects the starting times of production orders, the order sequence
in the production schedule, or even the production duration. In other words, to make production
more resilient, there is a need for more transparency, including information-based management
of operators on the shop floor, in order to make optimal operational decisions and thus mitigate
the impact of any adverse events.</p>
        <p>One way to increase the value and quality of information on the shop floor is through
simulation. Correlating the current situation of production (i. e., orders, resources, and stocks)
with the influencing factors in a production-related simulation model builds a powerful basis
for decision-making, which operators can continuously use in their daily tasks. With this
information, the operators can take an informed decision when to start which order to remain
eficient despite the turbulences in the supply and value chain.</p>
        <p>The basis of the start time point optimization lies in the interconnection of the simulation of
the distribution logistics and the material flow simulation of the production. This comprehensive
model creates the possibility to grasp the efects of unforeseeable events early and to analyze
them on the basis of the production simulation. One possible scenario is ensuring material
availability for a specific production order. In particular, if the material is not available at the
start time, but a delivery is planned. Here, a simulated confirmation with a certain probability
score becomes the condition to start the order in advance.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-3">
        <title>4.3. Solution Approach</title>
        <p>Precise material availability predictions are essential for a smooth production process. Reliable
identification and assessment of related supply chain risks are fundamental to allow for risk
management in a timely manner. To better understand the production processes, existing or
planned production plants can be modeled as virtual twins, which are used to simulate the
material flow in the plant to determine when a certain material needs to be available to complete
the production on time.</p>
        <p>
          Risks like delayed transport or disruptive events can directly influence production results
and production site utilization. The identification and evaluation of these risks are based on
internal and external data, including information about suppliers, products, and logistics. The
data is prepared and transformed into a knowledge graph, where the knowledge graph from
CoyPu extends the data available from internal knowledge graphs. The ontology developed
within CoyPu as well as existing ontologies, such as the Digital Reference [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
          ], serve as the basis
for the knowledge graph modeling. Machine learning methods and graph analysis techniques
are used to derive risks and knowledge from the data, e.g., critical paths and bottlenecks in
the supply chain, relevant crisis events, or properties of a delivery. Further, the results can be
annotated with scores, which could be interpreted as risk or probability scores, to facilitate the
understanding of the results. The outputs of the artificial intelligence algorithms are part of
a CoyPu-based recommender system (see Figure 3), which acts as a decision support tool for
the domain expert. Based on the recommendations, the experts in the logistics or procurement
department can decide on the proper mitigation measures.
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. General Challenges</title>
      <p>The previous sections focused on specific demand and supply challenges in the use cases as
well as solution approaches. In this section, further general challenges are highlighted, which
also need to be taken into consideration during the development of the use cases.
• Domain inherent complexity: A further challenge is that cause-efect relationships are
dificult to measure. Explaining the consequences of an event when it has not happened
yet is hard to forecast. Both production processes and supply chain processes are complex
and can have many variations at any time scale. Positive and negative efects on demand
or supply can cancel or amplify each other, adding another dimension of complexity.
• Complexity of data model and volume of data: Modeling supply chain and
production processes in a knowledge graph requires domain experts for meaningful results.
Furthermore, data scientists have requirements on modeling because machine learning
algorithms might require specific input structures. For machine learning, data complexity
might create a performance problem. This challenge might need abstraction of complexity
at an early stage of modeling and scalability of technologies and hardware.
• Heterogeneity and rarity of crisis: Crisis and disruptive events are rare and
considerably heterogeneous. The data from diferent crises, for instance, the financial crisis
of 2010 or the pandemic of 2020 cannot be compared since their causes and efects are
largely diferent. Therefore, past crises can serve as benchmarks but will not be enough
to train data-driven AI approaches.
• Data security and quality: The aspect of considering information security should be
common practice. Beyond this, the aspect of data quality, i. e., incomplete, incorrect,
inaccurate, or out-of-date data must also be considered. All these aspects might derive
from both data complexity and data volume. Data ingestion and machine learning must
handle all of this to be reliable.
• Dependency between data models and machine learning methods: The applied
machine learning methods and available data need to be compatible with each other to
efectively solve the problems posed within the use case. The correct definition of the data
model can greatly influence the performance and usability of the algorithm. Diferent
kinds of machine learning approaches also have diferent requirements concerning the
data, e. g., supervised learning relies on labeled data for predictions, while unsupervised
learning discovers patterns in unlabeled data. The data model as well as the machine
learning algorithm usually need to be developed and adapted in an iterative manner.
• Explainability of machine learning results: Existing machine learning models, in
particular subsymbolic methods, often lack explainability and transparency, i. e., it is not
clear what exactly contributed to specific predictions or scores. Non-domain experts might
have dificulties understanding the predictions, but even domain experts who are familiar
with supply chain management and production might be hesitant to apply black-box
methods if they cannot trust them. Symbolic methods usually ofer better explainability,
e. g., in the form of rules, but often sufer from scalability issues. Explainability, however,
is crucial for a wider adoption of machine learning methods in industry.
• Trusted visual analytics: Decision makers will need comprehensible user interfaces
to take proper actions. Even if machine learning results may be comprehensible to data
scientists, an intelligent user interface for explaining results, data, and models is required
for the model to be trustworthy and understandable to decision makers. It must also
allow us to make ethical, correct, and unbiased decisions. Frequently, this could be a
decision between compliant and economical actions.
• Combine simulation of risk events with plant simulation: With reinforcement
learning, it would be possible to train an agent to react suitably to certain events or
disruptions. This would require simulating such events in combination with a simulation
of the production plant. However, this will become extremely complicated since it would
basically mean to simulate realistic supply chain events (e. g., material shortages and
delays), create artificial bills-of-processes, bills-of-materials, and then define and simulate
key performance indicators for the factory.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>6. Conclusion and Future Work</title>
      <p>Our work identified and presented challenges on the road to achieving supply chain resilience
and transparency within the CoyPu project’s industry use cases. Some of these challenges can be
addressed by the application of semantic technologies. The inherent complexity of the domain
can be mitigated by using ontologies to structure the domain and capture knowledge and complex
relations found in data. Furthermore, knowledge graphs are known to handle heterogeneous
data from diferent data silos well and provide the basis for an intuitive visualization for
analytics with dashboards. They also allow for an extensible data structure to handle and
connect extensive amounts of data from various sources.</p>
      <p>Solving the issues with tactical demand and the Bullwhip Efect can be enabled by relying on
external indicators for demand forecasting or collaborative demand forecasting approaches such
as anonymous surveys. Furthermore, a lack of transparency in supply chains can be improved
by connecting external with internal data, making use of publicly available information. The
combination of risk identification with plant simulation requires a common framework, which
needs to be developed with the corresponding partners.</p>
      <p>Further next steps in the mitigation of the above-mentioned challenges in the CoyPu project
are the creation of further domain models, such as a supply chain ontology. These should be
able to handle heterogeneous data from the industry. The knowledge graphs are the result
of the data mapping and will be used by demonstrators for demand forecasting and resilient
production including dashboards for visualization.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>This work has been supported by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Afairs and Climate
Action (BMWK) as part of the project CoyPu under grant number 01MK21007[A-L].</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Ponsignon</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Modeling and Solving Master Planning Problems in Semiconductor Manufacturing</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Ph.D. thesis</source>
          ,
          <year>2012</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Burkacky</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Lingemann</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Pototzky</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Coping with the autosemiconductor shortage: strategies for success</article-title>
          ,
          <year>2021</year>
          . URL: https: //www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and
          <article-title>-assembly/our-insights/ coping-with-the-auto-semiconductor-shortage-strategies-for-success.</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Ehm</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Ponsignon</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Dr</surname>
          </string-name>
          . Kaufmann,
          <article-title>The global supply chain is our new fab: Integration and</article-title>
          automation challenges,
          <year>2011</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>6</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1109/ASMC.
          <year>2011</year>
          .
          <volume>5898164</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Padmanabhan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Whang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip efect</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Management Science</source>
          <volume>43</volume>
          (
          <year>2004</year>
          )
          <fpage>546</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>558</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1287/mnsc.1040.0266.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Foster</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Deck</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Farmer</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Behavioral demand efects when buyers anticipate inventory shortages</article-title>
          ,
          <source>European Journal of Operational Research</source>
          <volume>276</volume>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
          <fpage>217</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>234</lpage>
          . URL: https://ideas. repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v276y2019i1p217-
          <fpage>234</fpage>
          .html. doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.ejor.
          <year>2019</year>
          .
          <volume>01</volume>
          .00.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Sterman</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Dogan, “
          <article-title>i'm not hoarding, i'm just stocking up before the hoarders get here</article-title>
          .”,
          <source>Journal of Operations Management 39-40</source>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.jom.
          <year>2015</year>
          .
          <volume>07</volume>
          .002.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Beer</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Der Bullwhip-Efekt
          <source>in einem komplexen Produktionsnetzwerk</source>
          , Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden,
          <year>2014</year>
          . URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-
          <fpage>658</fpage>
          -06118-0. doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/ 978-3-
          <fpage>658</fpage>
          -06118-0.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Ismail</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Ehm</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Mitigating the bullwhip efect in the end-to-end semiconductor supply chains using end-to-end supply chain simulation, 20</article-title>
          , IEEE,
          <year>2021</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Klug</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Beschafungslogistik im Automobilbau,
          <year>2018</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>329</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>403</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/ 978-3-
          <fpage>662</fpage>
          -55873-
          <issue>7</issue>
          _
          <fpage>8</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Digital</surname>
            <given-names>Reference</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Digital reference,
          <year>2022</year>
          . Https://w3id.org/ecsel-dr.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Schroeder</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>B. von See</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Schnelle</surname>
          </string-name>
          , W. Kersten,
          <source>Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Supply Chain Management</source>
          , Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden,
          <year>2021</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>3</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>24</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/978-3-
          <fpage>658</fpage>
          -33480-
          <issue>2</issue>
          _
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <surname>I. Raehlmann</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Corona! Die Krise der Verschlankung und ihre Folgen,
          <source>Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft</source>
          <volume>74</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <fpage>216</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>221</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/s41449-020-00216-9.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Brylowski</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Schröder</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            <surname>Kersten</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Machine learning im supply chain risk management:</article-title>
          <source>Studie</source>
          ,
          <year>2021</year>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .15480/882.3875.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Montecchi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Plangger</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. C.</given-names>
            <surname>West</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Supply chain transparency: A bibliometric review</article-title>
          and research agenda,
          <source>International Journal of Production Economics</source>
          <volume>238</volume>
          (
          <year>2021</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          . 1016/j.ijpe.
          <year>2021</year>
          .
          <volume>108152</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>