<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Assessing Flexibility of Organizations for Strategic Development of Agricultural Business Projects</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Rostyslav Yurynets</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Zoryna Yurynets</string-name>
          <email>zoryna_yur@ukr.net</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Joachim Becker</string-name>
          <email>joachim.becker@uni-ulm.de</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Oleksandra Kryven</string-name>
          <email>oleksandra.kryven@lnu.edu.ua</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Ivan Franko Lviv National University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Svobody avenue 18, Lviv, 79000</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Lviv Polytechnic National University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>12 Stepan Bandery str., Lviv, 79013</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>University of Ulm</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Helmholtzstrasse 16, Ulm, 89081</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>This paper investigates the flexibility of organizations for the strategic development of agricultural business projects. The suggested рrobit model provides organizations to evaluate and forecast the development of new agricultural business projects based on modeling the flexible business practice. The probit model also informs the investors and partners about the alleged success of projects based on flexibility or the ability to ensure their stable financial condition. The research is founded on the following methods: a systematic and deductive approach to the study of strategic development of agricultural business projects and systematization of factors that affects the flexibility of organizations; regression analysis to disclose the details of creating the probit model of the influence of factors on the flexibility of organizations. A рrobit model method is proposed in which the flexibility of organizations is defined as a correlation of the factors. A probit model affirms that the level and quality of innovative solutions, staff expertise, and net income per employee are important markers that reflect the organization's flexibility. On the basis of the рrobit model, leaders will have a chance to select flexibility and successful agricultural business projects.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>1 Organizations</kwd>
        <kwd>Flexibility</kwd>
        <kwd>Strategic development</kwd>
        <kwd>Model</kwd>
        <kwd>Probit Regression Analysis</kwd>
        <kwd>Agricultural Business Projects</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>In the face of increasing global competition and globalization processes, modern organizations are
forced to meet the requirements of innovation, adaptability, and responsiveness to the latest challenges.
The ability to restructure one's own business, organizational structure, and operational or production
processes in a short time is a consequence of this situation. This situation requires organizations to make
instant management decisions, which are due to appropriate information support.</p>
      <p>The economic crisis in Ukraine, caused by hostilities in the country and the COVID-19 pandemic,
has created unusual problems for businesses. This has led to increased risks for organizations. Scientists
and practitioners who have previously tried to anticipate such threats have considered them locally,
within individual countries.</p>
      <sec id="sec-1-1">
        <title>Reality forces organizations to live and work according to new patterns. The needs of the markets are constantly changing. The business is in the process of transformation. Flexibility and adaptability move from temporary measures (for the period of reorientation of production, business processes, or</title>
        <p>implementation of innovations, and changes) to permanent ones. Flexibility and adaptability are
becoming a system and culture of business management. Choosing the right business development
management model can be a starting point for survival and growth.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-2">
        <title>Businesses must be able to respond to the transformation of the external environment through</title>
        <p>changes -in organization structure and management model. At the same time, the main parameters of
business development should remain within acceptable limits. Also, organizations must be able to
quickly adjust the production of goods and services, taking into account the parameters specified by the
customer. Reconfiguration costs should not lead to significant changes in business results.</p>
        <p>The dynamic component of development allows organizations to reproduce and build capacity, and
adapt to global and domestic transformations. Innovation and adaptability are the foundation for
successful business development management and strategic development of agricultural business
projects.</p>
        <p>It is important not only to make products but also to turn an idea into a working project. Agricultural
business projects take into account the value of the product or service, consumer segment, sales
channels, customer interaction, identified key activities, resources, and partners. The most important
issue is the creation of agricultural business projects by professionals, and innovators seeking to realize
their potential. It is important in this process to strictly follow the principles of doing business, taking
into account the operation of basic economic laws, the presence of a new idea, and the staff team.</p>
        <p>Innovation-technological and personnel factors are important for Ukrainian organizations. These
factors consist of a certain group of subordinates. An important result of a business is its flexibility. The
approach to the assessment of flexibility is based on the use of the following important factors:
- level and quality of adopted innovative decisions (as an element of innovation and technological
factor),
- staff expertise (as an element of the personnel factor),
- net income per employee (the ratio of profit or loss from sales to staff) as an indicator that
characterizes the financial and economic condition of business development.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-3">
        <title>Today, there is a realistic understanding of finding methods to influence flexibility in order to better the strategic development of new agricultural business projects.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-4">
        <title>The proposed probit model provides organizations to evaluate and forecast the development of new</title>
        <p>agricultural business projects based on modeling the flexible business practice.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-5">
        <title>The probit model also informs the investors and partners about the alleged success of projects based on flexibility or the ability to ensure their stable financial condition.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-6">
        <title>The theoretical and methodological basis of the study is an exploratory work of foreign and domestic</title>
        <p>researchers, which demonstrate the issues of the flexibility of organizations, and strategic development
of new agricultural business projects.</p>
        <p>The research is founded on the following methods: a systematic and deductive approach to the study
of strategic development of agricultural business projects and systematization of factors that affects the
flexibility of organizations; regression analysis to disclose the details of creating the probit model of
the influence of factors on the flexibility of organizations.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Related Works</title>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>Analysis of the factors of strategic development of agricultural business is a prerequisite for the study of the flexibility of organizations. Assessment of the flexibility of the organization and factors of strategic development of agricultural business is of great importance for the formation and selection of agricultural business projects.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>The relevance of research on the flexibility of organizations is validated by a number of extensive studies [1-3]. The flexibility of organizations is considered a source of competitiveness, yet the flexibility of organizations for the strategic development of agricultural business projects is not well studied.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>Bamel [1] contributes to flexibility scientific literature by studying and evaluating the linkage of</title>
        <p>business resources with strategic flexibility with the help proposed by the author of the tools of the
knowledge management process. He suggests that business resources are positively and significantly
related to flexibility, and knowledge management process capability is involved in revealed
relationships.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-4">
        <title>Nowak [2] explore under what organizational and economic conditions business flexibility can lead</title>
        <p>to increased organizational effectiveness. Flexibility is а decisive importance because it allows
organizations to better adjust to new changes in the consumer market.</p>
        <p>
          Nowak [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref23">3</xref>
          ] in the study reveals that variety in cognitive resources and empowerment at the workplace
can support and contribute to business performance through flexibility. The author used the method of
structural equation modeling (SEM) for statistical data processing. The paper confirms that a favorable
effect can take place because the indicators enable organizations to find better applications for reliable
and current information, which makes it possible to reorganize the resources, and reserves in a way that
contributes to the improvement of business performance.
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-5">
        <title>Chantal [4] considered factors affecting the effectiveness of rural agricultural projects with a focus</title>
        <p>on the financial products, clients, agricultural environment, and financial institutions. The results
showed that there was a considerable and positive relationship between factors influencing financial
issues of business and the successful development of rural agricultural projects.</p>
        <p>
          Wauton, Odinwa, and Ekeogu [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25 ref4">5</xref>
          ] examined various agricultural projects. Analysis of variance
(ANOVA) was applied to test the hypotheses at the significance level of an event and probability. Lack
of insurance practices by farmers, when the farmers are not involved in the planning of the project,
weak government policies/leap services in agriculture, when the projects are not guided by the needs of
farmers, inadequate agricultural credits, lack of incentives for farmers and when projects are
genderspecific, among many other factors add up to the most serious challenges in successful adopting
effective agricultural projects [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25 ref4">5</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>Our article took into account the concepts of scientists who highlight the significance of the influence
of factors (level and quality of innovative solutions, staff expertise, net income per employee) on the
flexibility of the organization.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Methods</title>
      <p>The methodology of research of the problem is based on the use of the tool of economic and
mathematical modeling (probit-regression analysis). The calculations were performed using the
statistical analysis package STATISTICA.</p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>Probit regression analysis was used to make management decisions to implement successful business management models by establishing a relationship between the flexibility or inflexibility of the organizations and other factors. Both qualitative and quantitative indicators were considered in the organization’s flexibility modeling process.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>Indicators of organization flexibility or inflexibility can have only two values, 1 and 0. Therefore, we have the opportunity to form a probit regression model to predict the value of binary variables and identify the flexibility of organizations in the short term.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>Data for the model were obtained through a survey conducted in 2021. The methodology is based</title>
        <p>on the involvement of 62 national experts who are actively working or have worked in the agricultural
industry. All indicators that characterize the quality of the study meet the regulations (coefficients of
competence are within [0.57; 0.80], and the concordance coefficient is 0.70).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-4">
        <title>Tables 1 and 2 provide data for a probit model for estimating the flexibility of organizations in the agricultural industry. The described sample included 41 agricultural industry organizations.</title>
        <p>The level and quality of innovative decisions and staff expertise were determined by checking
between 0 and 10 (maximum 10). The flexibility of organizations was defined as 0 (lack of flexibility)
or 1 (flexible business). Quantitative data (profit or loss from sales to staff) on the financial activities
of the business were obtained from surveys. These data can be used to calculate net income per
employee.</p>
        <sec id="sec-3-4-1">
          <title>The level and quality Net income Flexibility</title>
          <p>of innovative per employee expertise (x2) of organizations
solutions (x1) (x3) (y)
Staff
№</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-4-2">
          <title>Oberig</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-4-3">
          <title>Artemiv</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-4-4">
          <title>Makiiv</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-4-5">
          <title>Kotikivka</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-4-6">
          <title>Bread of Ukraine</title>
          <p>Land Fund
22,498
-36,672
4,004
4
5
5
5
3</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-5">
        <title>Source: compiled by the authors based on the survey</title>
        <p>Probit-regression model allows for determining the group of flexibility in the agricultural industry
organizations. Probit-regression model provides an opportunity to study the probability that the business
will be assigned to a particular group of flexibility. This makes the probit regression tool unique for
assessing business flexibility.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-6">
        <title>Initially, we investigated the impact of the level and quality of innovative solutions on business flexibility. To do this, different values of the level and quality of innovative solutions were used, while other factors remained unchanged.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-7">
        <title>Then we investigated the impact of other factors on the flexibility of organizations. And the level and quality of innovative solutions remained unchanged. These options include several combinations of different factors. The probit model looks like this [6]:</title>
        <p>p(х) = P(Y = 1| X = х) = Ф(хTb),
(1)
( ) =</p>
        <p>1
√2</p>
        <p>
          2
∫  − 2  ,
−∞
unknown parameters that should be estimated [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26 ref5">6</xref>
          ].
synchronous appearance of the sample results  1,  2, … ,   [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27 ref6">7</xref>
          ]:
where Ф is the integral distribution function of the standard normal distribution, and b is the
The likelihood function is the groundwork of the method and expresses the possible density of the
 ( 1,  2, … ,   ;  ) =  ( 1;  ) ⋅ … ⋅  (  ;  )
According to the maximum likelihood method, the value of 
=  ( 1,  2, … ,   ) that maximizes
the function  is accepted to be in the estimation of an unknown parameter. The calculation process is
simplified by maximizing not the function  , but the natural logarithm ln( ). It has to do with the fact
that the maximum of both functions is achieved with identical values of  [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26 ref5">6</xref>
          ]:
        </p>
        <p>
          ∗ ( ;  ) = ln( ( ;  )) → max
[
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26 ref5">6</xref>
          ]:
        </p>
        <p>Now, the next action is that we get a binary independent variable thanks to the probit model. That's
why we point out the probability of appearance of 1 (  = Prob(  = 1)) by   . This probability will
depend on   where   , is the row of the regressors' matrix, 
is the vector of regression coefficients
  = (  ), ( ) =</p>
        <p>1
√2 ∫−∞  − 2 
 2</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-8">
        <title>In this case, the log-likelihood function takes the form [6]:</title>
        <p>( ,  ) = ∏
  =1 (   )  [ − (   )]1−</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-9">
        <title>Ln( ) was used in the simulation, and the  function was replaced. The content of our task has not</title>
        <p>
          changed, but we have simplified the work and avoided multiplication [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27 ref6">7</xref>
          ]:

 ∗ = ln = ∑
        </p>
        <p>=   ln(   ) + ( −   )ln( − (   ))</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-10">
        <title>Therefore, we must use the next symbols [7]:</title>
        <p>W = (W0, W1,…,Wm)T,</p>
        <p>Xi = (1, Xi1,…,Xim),</p>
        <p>XiW = W0 + W1Xi1 + W2Xi1 +…+ WmXim</p>
        <p>
          We used an approach called the Newton-Raphson method to maximize the  . The iteration method
was used to solve the problem [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26 ref5">6</xref>
          ]:
0
0
0
0
0
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
where
∂2ln  (  )
∂ ∂ ′
        </p>
        <p>=
industry:
1).</p>
        <p>=


 =
(  =
∑ (   )( − (   )) ,
…</p>
        <p>∑ (   )( − (   ))  ,
∑ (   )( − (   ))  1,
… … …
∑ (   )( − (   ))    1,
…
∑ (   )( − (   ))  ,</p>
        <p>∑ (   )( − (   ))   
…
…</p>
        <p>=
 =

 =</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Experiment, results, and discussion</title>
      <p>The following indicators were used to assess the flexibility of organizations in the agricultural
x1 – level and quality of innovative solutions,
x2 – staff expertise,
x3 – net income per employee.</p>
      <p>The parameters of the obtained probit model in the STATISTICA environment are as follows (figure
  +1 =   −
 ln  (  ) [∂2∂ln ∂( ′ )]−1</p>
      <p>ln  ( )</p>
      <p>= ( 0( ),  1( ), … ,   ( ))
 0( ) = ∑ =1 (   ) − ∑</p>
      <p>{ :  =1} 1
  ( ) = ∑ = (</p>
      <p>)  − ∑
{ :  =1}   ,  = 1,2, … ,</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>The following initial values had been defined as the direction of the linear regression options [6]:</title>
        <p>(st) = (   )−1  
It was significant that the final stage of the research is an activation of the conjugate gradient method.
(8)
(9)
(10)</p>
        <p>)
(11)
confirmed by the calculated value of the chi-square (χ²-distribution), which is equal to 58.2 and almost
zero probability not to reject the null hypothesis.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>The three-factor probit model is as follows:</title>
        <p>(  = 1|  ) = (40 − 2,3 1 − 3,5 2 − 0,009 3) (12)</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-3">
        <title>The resulting expression can be used to assess the flexibility of organizations, taking into account</title>
        <p>the factors described above.</p>
        <p>Figure 2 shows the dependence of the studied indicator of the flexibility in terms of changing the
factor x3 (net income per employee) for certain values of the factor x1 (level and quality of innovative
solutions) and the fixed value of the factor x2 (x2 = 6). That is, the growth of net income per employee
for different values of the level and quality of innovative solutions and fixed values of staff expertise
leads to an increase the flexibility of organizations.</p>
        <p>1
y
lit 0.8
i
b
i
ex0.6
l
f
sse0.4
n
i
su0.2
B
0</p>
        <p>x1=9
x1=8
x1=7
e
v
i
t
a
v
o
n
n
i
fo sn
lty liuo
i t
aqu so
d
n
a
l
e
v
e
L
x3=-10
x3=0</p>
        <p>x3=10</p>
        <p>Net income per employee</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-4">
        <title>Net income per employee is one of the important financial categories [8]. This indicator reflects the</title>
        <p>attractive financial result of the business, and outlines the success of its operation, the efficiency of
production processes, and the situation with productivity. The business must be profitable, operate
successfully, increase its value, and bring income to its owners and employees.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-5">
        <title>The economic meaning of net income per employee is to disclose the core business. Business</title>
        <p>profitability is one of the most important indicators that characterize the financial and economic
condition of the business and sets the purpose of its activities.</p>
        <p>Managers can more effectively manage a business, create a management model and development
strategy, determine the optimal course of action, and increase profits by analyzing profitability. This
provides information on when the business will start to make a profit, when the business will repay the
loans, and what investments will bring measurable financial benefits. High profitability will increase
the value of the business. With the correct application of profitability analysis, it is possible to
effectively correct management errors, choose an effective investment and innovation strategy for the
development of new agricultubased onral business projects and increase revenue.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-6">
        <title>The higher the level of net income per employee, the better. However, there is no optimal level of</title>
        <p>this ratio that would reflect different levels of profitability. Therefore, the results should be interpreted
on the basis of changes in the indicator over time. As the level of net income increases, financial
security, business development opportunities and adaptation to dynamic environmental conditions
increase. Growth also means that a business has a competitive advantage due to a specific product, a
patented technology or a unique brand.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-7">
        <title>Today, business is interested in generating income and maximizing it. Thus, it is important for business to address issues of effective profitability management. The amount of income received is extremely important for strategic business development and implementation of agricultural business projects.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-8">
        <title>Profitability has an impact on the formation of financial resources, growth of market value of</title>
        <p>
          business, efficiency and effectiveness of organizations [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29 ref8">9</xref>
          ]. Therefore, the importance of profitability in
business development determines the feasibility of studying the formation and implementation of an
effective system of business profitability management.
        </p>
        <p>
          Business is forced to form a structure of financial resources that will increase the efficiency of
financial and economic activities, financial stability, solvency and minimize possible financial risks. In
modern conditions in the process of forming the financial resources of the business increases the
importance of profitability, profit, depreciation and borrowed funds [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27 ref6">7</xref>
          ]. The main goal of the business
profitability management system is to find the best sources of income generation, areas of distribution
and use of income to ensure business development and increase competitiveness. Implementation of the
business profitability management system involves solving the following tasks: planning the degree of
profitability, establishing reserves to increase profitability and the level of riskiness of activities,
providing a system of control and monitoring the distribution and use of income.
        </p>
        <p>Figure 3 shows the dependence of the studied indicator when changing the factor x1 (level and
quality of innovative solutions) for certain values of the factor x2 (staff expertise) and the fixed value
of the factor x3 (x3 = 0). That is, increasing the level and quality of innovative solutions for different
values of staff expertise and fixed values of net income per employee leads to increase the flexibility of
organizations.</p>
        <p>ty 1
i
ilb0.8
i
lex0.6
f
ss0.4
e
isn0.2
u
B 0
x1=6
x1=7
x1=8</p>
        <p>x1=9
Level and quality of innovative solutions
x2=6
x2=8
e
s
i
t
r
e
p
x
e
f
f
a
t
S</p>
        <p>
          Researchers who adhere to the institutional concept of economic growth [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30 ref9">10</xref>
          ] believe that the
adoption of innovative decisions by managers contributes to positive results for organizations and the
country.
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-9">
        <title>Creation of managerial innovations involves the search for new solutions, management methods,</title>
        <p>innovation in the business process. Innovation management aims to develop business through the
introduction of changes, new management practices, improvement of processes or structures in
breakthrough areas of business. Firstly, it depends on the innovative thinking of managers, their ability
to produce and implement new solutions to implement the new agricultural business projects.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-10">
        <title>Successful operation and development of business requires an arsenal of various management tools, reactions and the ability to anticipate events in a high level of unpredictability of the environment [11, c. 3]. Management innovations can be one of the key factors influencing the performance and development of modern organizations [12].</title>
        <p>Management innovations have a significant impact on the flexibility, adaptability, efficiency,
competitiveness of the business: unexpectedness, uncertainty of the result (most innovative
management decisions are difficult to predict and test in advance, and after implementation errors can
be too significant and fatal for organizations); creativity as the basis of innovative management
decisions (manager must have the appropriate competencies, intelligence, skills, form and implement
effective solutions); clash of operational and innovative goals and objectives to synchronize the
implementation of operational and strategic business development; the cost of working time and the
cost of agricultural business projects are too high, and the economic effect will be stretched over time,
the costs and consequences of innovation are unevenly distributed in time, the payback period of
implemented management innovation solutions is long; the existence of a sufficient number of obstacles
in the implementation of management decisions and changes, due to the creation of conflicts of interest
in the process of managing business development.</p>
        <p>Management of agricultural business projects needs to consider certain conditions to increase the
effectiveness of innovative solutions:</p>
        <p>- managers must support innovation for success of organizations in the market and strive for
progress, encourage creative and active employees;</p>
        <p>- managers should contribute to the creation of a climate of organizational culture that encourages
innovation and change;</p>
        <p>- managers should be open to suggestions for technical and technological improvements, break
stereotypes;
- managers must cultivate the creativity of employees, get rid of conservatives and passive people.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-11">
        <title>The introduction of an innovative model of development in Ukrainian enterprises involves a radical</title>
        <p>restructuring of their economic activities on the basis of the latest management paradigm. This paradigm
requires the implementation of new technologies in business, prompt and preventive response to the
transformation of business conditions. The high level of turbulence in the market environment
encourages business to develop competitive advantages, to form innovative management decisions.
This is due to the fact that traditional management tools do not provide the ability of business to adapt
to new market conditions [11, с. 3].</p>
        <p>Figure 4 shows the dependence of the studied indicator when changing the factor x2 (staff expertise)
for certain values of the factor x3 (net income per employee) and the fixed value of the factor x1 (x1 =
5). That is, increasing the level of staff expertise for different values of net income per employee and
fixed values of the level and quality of innovative solutions leads to increase the flexibility of
organizations.</p>
        <p>1
y
t
ili 0.8
b
i
lex0.6
f
ss0.4
e
n
isu0.2
B 0
x2=7</p>
        <p>x2=8
Staff expertise
x2=9</p>
        <p>x3=10</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-12">
        <title>Successful business development is manifested in the implementation of various types of agricultural business projects. This is due to the staff expertise, their skills and abilities, competencies that contribute to the formation of human capital in business.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-13">
        <title>Factors that determine the flexibility of organizations, the efficiency of operation and development of the business depend on the competence of the staff. Staff expertise allows getting an idea of the quality and effectiveness of organizations in the environment.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-14">
        <title>Personnel management strengthens the connection between employees and the flexibility of any</title>
        <p>
          organizations. Businesses need to make sure that staff have the necessary opportunities to increase
efficiency of organizations. Personnel development management is one of the main concepts of
personnel management. Management based on staff expertise takes into account educational
competencies, skills, potential, as well as behavior that affects staff skills [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13 ref34">14</xref>
          ].
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-15">
        <title>In the joint decision-making process, the team of employees must know the elements of the business</title>
        <p>system. The marketing department should have information about customers and business activities.
This allows you to look for new solutions and agricultural business projects, to achieve a common goal.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-16">
        <title>An alternative to staff replacement is training and retraining of employees. It is important to research</title>
        <p>the needs of employees so that investment in staff does not become a loss for the business. To do this,
it is necessary to conduct an analysis, taking into account the knowledge and skills of employees,
expectations for further development. Any form of employee competence development should be
closely linked to business strategy and have an impact on the development of flexibility. Investments
in the employee form in him a sense of stability of work, a sense of need for skills and experience.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-17">
        <title>According to a survey conducted in 2020 in Polish companies, it was found that 82% of respondents</title>
        <p>
          believe that changing the system of employee education is important or very important for
organizations. 5% of respondents stated that their company is fully or partially ready for this. 53% of
women and 58% of men say that their immediate supervisor is aware of their professional ambitions
[
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13 ref34">14</xref>
          ].
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-18">
        <title>Employee participation in a variety of trainings and training courses benefits the business and the</title>
        <p>
          employee. An employee can improve their competencies and develop many skills, increase self-esteem.
Employee training and development is directly embodied in business success [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12 ref33">13</xref>
          ]. Every employer
should take care of this aspect in their business. Employees who are satisfied and confident in their
qualifications will be happy to use the acquired experience and skills in their professional work. And
this is the main advantage of business. Expansion of practical skills and exchange of experience in the
professional sphere provide an opportunity to receive challenges, change business, influence the level
of flexibility, increase competitiveness. It is important to regularly evaluate the results of work, a clear
presentation of career paths and career prospects.
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-19">
        <title>Now we need to evaluate the flexibility of а new projects of creation of organizations (business) with a probit model. Information on the flexibility of а further agricultural business project is presented in the table below.</title>
        <p>( 1 = 1) = (40 − 2,3 ∙ 5 − 3,5 ∙ 9 − 0,009 ∙ 5) = 0,999
 ( 2 = 1) = (40 − 2,3 ∙ 7 − 3,5 ∙ 7 − 0,009 ∙ 30) = 0,85
 ( 3 = 1) = (40 − 2,3 ∙ 5 − 3,5 ∙ 8 − 0,009 ∙ 20) = 0,44</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-20">
        <title>The outcome illustrates that the first and second project is the best flexibility. This may entail engaging internal and external stakeholders extensively in the strategic development of new agricultural business projects and business processes.</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Conclusions</title>
      <sec id="sec-5-1">
        <title>Reduced flexibility of organizations is an indication to implement measures for strategic development of various agricultural business projects. The flexibility of any organization is an important way for managing the strategic development of projects.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-2">
        <title>For high flexibility, a probit regression modelling way to predict the future development of the</title>
        <p>organization and to consistently link factors influencing flexibility is essential. It has also been found
that the assessment of the flexibility of organizations gives a new insight into behavior of projects.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-3">
        <title>This information is also an essential for contributors of investment market, and other financial institutions or individuals who want to develop a business environment and take profits from investments. However, supplementary research projects are expected to further a realization of obstacles to predicting the level of flexibility of organizations.</title>
        <p>An examination of the concept of flexibility has been done, showing the attendance of both negative
and positive sides of factors and flexibility of organizations.
6. Referenses</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>2 Kernel 9</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>3 Fozzy Group 8</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>4 MHP 9</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>5 Epicenter Agro 10</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>6 Nibulon 8</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>7 Roshen 8</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>8 ADM Ukraine 9</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>9 Suntrade 9</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>10 Eridon 9</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>11 Kargil 9</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>12 Glencor Agriculture Ukraine 8</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>13 Nestle 9</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>14 Sandora 10</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>15 Louis DrUeykfruasinCeompany 9</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>16 Optimus Agro Trade 9</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>17 Ostchem 8</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>18 Dniproazot 8</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>19 Coca-Cola Beverages 8</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>20 Delta Wilmar Ukraine 9</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          21 Astartа 10 Source:
          <article-title>compiled by the authors based on the survey</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>U.K.</given-names>
            <surname>Bamel</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Bamel</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Organizational resources, KM process capability and strategic flexibility: a dynamic resource-capability perspective</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Knowledge Management</source>
          ,
          <volume>22</volume>
          (
          <issue>7</issue>
          ),
          <year>2018</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>1555</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1572</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Nowak</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Foundations of strategic flexibility: focus on cognitive diversity and structural empowerment</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Management Research Review</source>
          ,
          <volume>45</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <year>2022</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>217</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>235</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref23">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Nowak</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Strategic flexibility and performance: effects of potential and realized absorptive capacity</article-title>
          ,
          <source>International Journal of Innovation Management</source>
          ,
          <volume>25</volume>
          (
          <issue>7</issue>
          ),
          <year>2021</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>22</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref24">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. K.</given-names>
            <surname>Chantal</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Factors affecting financing of rural agricultural projects in Rwanda: experience of equity bank</article-title>
          ,
          <source>International Journal of Scientific Research and Management</source>
          ,
          <volume>9</volume>
          (
          <issue>10</issue>
          ),
          <year>2021</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>2484</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>2491</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref25">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E. O.</given-names>
            <surname>Wauton</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B. C.</given-names>
            <surname>Odinwa</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Ekeogu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Evaluation of agricultural projects and extension services of the bayelsa state agricultural development programme (ADP)</article-title>
          .
          <source>Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension Economics &amp; Sociology</source>
          ,
          <volume>40</volume>
          (
          <issue>9</issue>
          ),
          <year>2022</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>273</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>284</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref26">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Yurynets</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Yurynets</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Kokhan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Econometric analysis of the impact of expert assessments on the business activity in the context of investment and innovation development</article-title>
          ,
          <source>CEUR Workshop Proceedings</source>
          ,
          <volume>2604</volume>
          ,
          <year>2020</year>
          , available at: http://ceur-ws.
          <source>org/</source>
          Vol-
          <volume>2604</volume>
          /paper47.
          <source>pdf (accessed 16 January</source>
          <year>2023</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref27">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H. W.</given-names>
            <surname>Volberda</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F. A. J. Van Den</given-names>
            <surname>Bosch</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C. V.</given-names>
            <surname>Heij</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Management Innovation:
          <article-title>Management as Fertile Ground for Innovation</article-title>
          ,
          <source>European Management Review</source>
          ,
          <volume>10</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <year>2013</year>
          , рр. 1-
          <fpage>15</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref28">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Kuzmin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Bublyk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Shakhno</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Korolenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Lashkun</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Innovative development of human capital in the conditions of globalization</article-title>
          ,
          <source>E3S Web Conferences</source>
          ,
          <volume>166</volume>
          ,
          <year>2020</year>
          ,
          <volume>13011</volume>
          , available at: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016613011 (accessed
          <issue>16</issue>
          <year>January 2023</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref29">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
            <surname>Rishnyak</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Veres</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Lytvyn</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Bublyk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
            <surname>Karpov</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Vysotska</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Panasyuk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Implementation models application for IT project risk management</article-title>
          ,
          <source>CEUR Workshop Proceedings</source>
          ,
          <volume>2805</volume>
          ,
          <year>2020</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>102</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>117</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref30">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R. R.</given-names>
            <surname>Augustine</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I. O.</given-names>
            <surname>Demіkіv</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Management innovations as an official of promotion of competitiveness of enterprises</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Efficient economy, 4</source>
          ,
          <year>2020</year>
          , available at: http://www. economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&amp;z=
          <volume>7815</volume>
          (accessed
          <issue>16</issue>
          <year>January 2023</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref31">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. N.</given-names>
            <surname>Najm</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Mohammad</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Managerial innovation: an attempt to interpretation and evaluation</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research</source>
          ,
          <volume>17</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <year>2019</year>
          , рр.
          <fpage>53</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>68</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref32">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Kraśnicka</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            <surname>Głód</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Wronka-Pośpiech</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Management innovation and its measurement</article-title>
          .
          <source>journal of entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation (JEMI)</source>
          ,
          <volume>12</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <year>2016</year>
          , рр.
          <fpage>95</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>122</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref33">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Prajogo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Oke</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Human capital, service innovation advantage, and business performance. The moderating roles of dynamic and competitive environments</article-title>
          ,
          <source>International Journal of Operations &amp; Production Management</source>
          ,
          <volume>36</volume>
          (
          <issue>9</issue>
          ),
          <year>2016</year>
          , рр.
          <fpage>974</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>994</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref34">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14] Rozwój pracownika to sukces firmy,
          <year>2020</year>
          , available at: https://infowire.pl/ generic/release/540304/rozwoj-pracownika
          <article-title>-to-sukces-firmy (accessed 16 January</article-title>
          <year>2023</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>