<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Workshop on Text Mining and Generation (TMG)</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Mirko Lenz</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Lorik Dumani</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Alexander Bondarenko</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Shahbaz Syed</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Fürstengraben 1, 07743 Jena</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Leipzig University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Augustusplatz 10, 04109 Leipzig</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Trier University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Universitätsring 15, 54296 Trier</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>This paper is a report on the first Text Mining and Generation Workshop (TMG), which was a one-day virtual event hosted at the German Conference on Artificial Intelligence (KI 2022) in Trier, Germany. In addition to four accepted original papers, there were three invited talks by speakers who presented their works already published at high-ranked conferences as well as one keynote by a pioneer in the two research fields relevant to the workshop.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;Text mining</kwd>
        <kwd>Text generation</kwd>
        <kwd>Natural language processing</kwd>
        <kwd>Workshop</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction and Motivation</title>
      <p>Digital text data is available in large amounts and diferent granularities. Typical sources of
this data are social media posts, books, news articles, web pages, company reports, etc. A
major challenge this text data imposes is that it is unstructured and has to first be processed
to make further analysis possible. At the same time, there are also many situations in which
only structured data is available that is to be verbally explained, for instance, by Explainable AI.
These contrasting scenarios lead to two complementary application areas: text mining and text
generation. The aim of text mining is to analyze the content of unstructured text and extract
(useful) structured information. In contrast, text generation attempts to (automatically) create
text from structured information or knowledge that is for example stored in large language
models. The goal of the TMG workshop is to bring these two perspectives together by eliciting
research paper submissions that aim for bridging the gap between knowledge extraction and
text generation. Since recent approaches to text mining and text generation are predominantly
based on artificial intelligence (AI) methodologies, KI 2022 has been a great venue to bring
together AI researchers working on these two tasks.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Accepted Papers</title>
      <p>In total, we accepted four papers for publication. In the following, we provide a brief overview
of their main contributions. The paper “German to English: Fake News Detection with Machine
Translation” applies translation (essentially a text generation task) to mitigate the fact that
languages other than English mostly have worse ML models available. Their evaluation shows
that translating such texts beforehand and then using the better English models is a valuable
processing step. “IRT2: Inductive Linking and Ranking in Knowledge Graphs of Varying
Scale” is concerned with knowledge graph completion based on natural language text and
thus covers the text mining task. The authors propose two models for predicting links in
knowledge graphs and provide initial results based on an experimental evaluation. The third
paper “Explaining Hate Speech Classification with Model-Agnostic Methods” proposes a pipeline
to create interpretable explanations for black-box models like BERT classifiers. By leveraging
text generation, they aim to assist users in detecting hate speech in a model-agnostic way.
Finally, “Comparing Unsupervised Algorithms to Construct Argument Graphs” is concerned
with generating relations between argumentative statements that are extracted from plain texts.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. Keynote Talk</title>
      <p>A keynote talk titled “Detect—Verify—Communicate: Combating Misinformation with More
Realistic NLP” was given by Prof. Dr. Iryna Gurevych (Technical University (TU) of Darmstadt,
Germany), who addressed the omnipresent problem of misinformation in our society, and
elaborated on how to identify and debunk misinformation. In particular, she addressed the fact
that current NLP systems cannot be used for fact-checking in real-life scenarios and presented
her work where they are exploring solutions for this. While the main problems reside with
resources, their research is dedicated to the most harmful, novel examples. Besides two corpora
constructed for this purpose, they compare the capabilities of automated NLP-based approaches
to the methods people use for fact-checking. In order to include diferent perspectives, they
collaborate with cognitive scientists and psychologists.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Invited Talks</title>
      <p>
        At the workshop, we also had three invited talks to spark a discussion and exchange of
knowledge and ideas. We selected three previously published papers at top-tier conferences (EACL,
SIGIR, and WWW) that cover the topics of text mining and generation [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref2 ref3">1, 2, 3</xref>
        ]. In their talk,
Adrian Ulges presented a multi-task approach for entity-level relation extraction from texts that
combines entity mention localization with coreference resolution [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ]. Further, Milad Alshomary
presented a query-independent graph-based extractive summarization approach for
argumentative web documents [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ] that utilizes the PageRank algorithm [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ] to estimate the importance
of each sentence in arguments retrieved from a given web document. Finally, Wei-Fan Chen
talked about a query-biased abstractive summarization approach for snippet generation [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]
and showed that their bidirectional model based on pointer-generator networks could generate
lfuent snippets with low text reuse from the source document while preserving query terms.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Conclusion and Discussion</title>
      <p>In the first Text Mining and Generation Workshop, a total of four papers were accepted for
publication that addressed various topics such as fake news, knowledge graphs, explanations,
and relation generation in the context of text mining and generation. In addition, our keynote
and invited talks allowed students and young scientists to connect with experienced researchers,
ask questions, and participate in discussions.</p>
      <p>
        We expect the topics of this workshop will be becoming increasingly important in the future,
particularly with the emergence of new large language models (LLMs). The significant
advancements in (retrieval-augmented) text generation introduced by LLMs like GPT-3, ChatGPT,
and BLOOM make it crucial that we extensively study their impact on downstream tasks and
benchmark key findings. On the one hand, for example, GPT-3 has been found to outperform
all supervised models on the news summarization task [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ]. On the other hand, LLMs trained on
the data that contains misinformation may tend to repeat it [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]. This highlights the need for
eficient methods that leverage text mining to extract information from structured (credible)
documents, “guide” generation, and provide the sources of evidence. Moreover, new evaluation
methodologies are needed that consider the purpose and suitability of generated texts, not just
their similarity to the ground truth. In future iterations of our workshop, we will explore this
along with text mining and generation techniques to gain a comprehensive understanding of
LLMs’ potential applications and limitations.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>This work has been funded by the DFG within the projects “ReCAP-II” (No. 375342983) and
“ACQuA 2.0: Answering Comparative Questions with Arguments” (No. 376430233) as part of
the priority program RATIO (SPP-1999) as well as the “Studienstiftung”.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Alshomary</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Düsterhus</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Wachsmuth</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Extractive snippet generation for arguments</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Proceedings of SIGIR</source>
          <year>2020</year>
          , ACM,
          <year>2020</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>1969</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1972</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Syed</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Stein</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Hagen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Potthast</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Abstractive snippet generation</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Proceedings of WWW</source>
          <year>2020</year>
          , ACM / IW3C2,
          <year>2020</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>1309</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1319</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Eberts</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Ulges</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>An end-to-end model for entity-level relation extraction using multiinstance learning</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Proceedings of EACL</source>
          <year>2021</year>
          , ACL,
          <year>2021</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>3650</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>3660</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Page</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Brin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Motwani</surname>
          </string-name>
          , T. Winograd,
          <article-title>The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Technical Report</source>
          , Stanford InfoLab,
          <year>1999</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Goyal</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>G.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Durrett, News summarization and evaluation in the era of GPT-3</article-title>
          , CoRR abs/2209.12356 (
          <year>2022</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Lin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Hilton</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>O. Evans,</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>TruthfulQA: Measuring how models mimic human falsehoods</article-title>
          ,
          <source>in: Proceedings of ACL</source>
          <year>2022</year>
          , ACL,
          <year>2022</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>3214</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>3252</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>